Image quality assessment of photon-counting CT for patients with prostate cancer receiving radiotherapy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43988Keywords:
Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Radiotherapy, Image-Guided, Prostatic Neoplasms, Image Enhancement, Phantoms, Imaging, Radiotherapy, Contrast MediaAbstract
Background and purpose: Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) offers enhanced image quality, including improvements in contrast, spatial resolution, and noise reduction. In radiotherapy (RT), optimal image quality is critical for accurate tumor and organ-at-risk delineation. However, reconstruction parameter selection often relies on subjective assessment. This study investigates whether quantitative image quality metrics, particularly contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), can systematically guide PCCT reconstruction parameter optimization for prostate cancer RT planning.
Material and methods: An anthropomorphic abdomen phantom (QRM, Möhrendorf, Germany) and five patients with prostate cancer undergoing RT were scanned on a Naeotom Alpha PCCT (Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). Reconstructions were performed across a range of kernel types, sharpness levels, and virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) energies, with the CNR calculated for each reconstruction. Additionally, a multidisciplinary expert panel qualitatively assessed a subset of reconstructions for two patients to compare with the quantitative findings.
Results: Softer kernels, particularly Br36 and Qr36, combined with lower VMI energies of 40 keV, consistently produced the highest CNR values in both phantom and patient datasets. The qualitative assessment generally supported the quantitative results, with minor deviations likely reflecting the experts’ preference for a more familiar image appearance.
Interpretation: Quantitative metrics such as CNR can reliably identify optimal PCCT reconstruction settings for prostate cancer RT, favoring lower VMI energies and softer reconstruction kernels. These findings were consistent across phantom and patient data and were supported by expert evaluations, indicating that a quantitative approach can effectively guide protocol development and reduce reliance on subjective image assessment.
Downloads
References
Shah KD, Zhou J, Roper J, Dhabaan A, Al-Hallaq H, Pourmorteza A, et al. Photon-counting CT in cancer radiotherapy: technological advances and clinical benefits. Phys Med Biol. 2025;70(10):10TR01.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/add4ba DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/add4ba
Flohr T, Petersilka M, Henning A, Ulzheimer S, Ferda J, Schmidt B. Photon-counting CT review. Phys Med. 2020;79:126–36.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.030
Nehra AK, Rajendran K, Baffour FI, Mileto A, Rajiah PS, Horst KK, et al. Seeing more with less: clinical benefits of photon-counting detector CT. Radiographics. 2023;43(5):e220158.
https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.220158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.220158
Kikano EG, Rajdev M, Salem KZ, Laukamp K, Felice CD, Gilkeson RC, et al. Utility of iodine density perfusion maps from dual-energy spectral detector CT in evaluating cardiothoracic conditions: a primer for the radiologist. Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214(4):775–85.
https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.21818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.21818
Gallo P, D’Alessio A, Pascuzzo R, Gallo S, Fumagalli ML, Ortenzia O, et al. Enhancing soft tissue differentiation with different dual-energy CT systems: a phantom study. Appl Sci. 2024;14(5):1724.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14051724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14051724
van der Bie J, van der Laan T, van Straten M, Booij R, Bos D, Dijkshoorn ML, et al. Photon-counting CT: an updated review of clinical results. Eur J Radiol. 2025;190:112189.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112189
Yang Y, Fink N, Emrich T, Graafen D, Richter R, Bockius S, et al. Optimization of kernel type and sharpness level improves objective and subjective image quality for high-pitch photon counting coronary CT angiography. Diagnostics. 2023;13(11):1937.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111937
Graafen D, Müller L, Halfmann MC, Stoehr F, Foerster F, Düber C, et al. Soft reconstruction kernels improve HCC imaging on a photon-counting detector CT. Acad Radiol 2023;30(1):S143–54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.03.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.03.026
Milos RI, Röhrich S, Prayer F, Strassl A, Beer L, Heidinger BH, et al. Ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector CT of the lungs: association of reconstruction kernel and slice thickness with image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023;220(5):672–80.
https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.22.28515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.22.28515
Rajagopal JR, Schwartz FR, McCabe C, Farhadi F, Zarei M, Ria F, et al. Technology characterization through diverse evaluation methodologies: application to thoracic imaging in photon-counting computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2025;49(1):113–24.
https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001608
Estler A, Nikolaou K, Schönberg SO, Bamberg F, Froelich MF, Tollens F, et al. Is there still a role for two-phase contrast-enhanced CT and virtual monoenergetic images in the era of photon-counting detector CT? Diagnostics. 2023;13(8):1454.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13081454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13081454
Schade KA, Mergen V, Sartoretti T, Alkadhi H, Euler A. Pseudoenhancement in cystic renal lesions – impact of virtual monoenergetic mages of photon-counting detector CT on lesion classification. Acad Radiol. 2023;30(Suppl. 1):S305–13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.04.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.04.005
Chamberlin JH, Toth A, Hinen S, O’Doherty J, Baruah D, Maisuria D, et al. Optimisation of virtual monoenergetic reconstructions for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism using photon-counting detector computed tomography angiography. Pol J Radiol. 2024;89:e63–9.
https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2024.134905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2024.134905
Yalynska T, Polacin M, Frauenfelder T, Martini K. Impact of photon counting detector CT derived virtual monoenergetic images on the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Diagnostics. 2022;12(11):2715.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112715
Jungblut L, Abel F, Nakhostin D, Mergen V, Sartoretti T, Euler A, et al. Impact of photon counting detector CT derived virtual monoenergetic images and iodine maps on the diagnosis of pleural empyema. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2023;104(2):84–90.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2022.09.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2022.09.006
Rau A, Straehle J, Stein T, Diallo T, Rau S, Faby S, et al. Photon-counting computed tomography (PC-CT) of the spine: impact on diagnostic confidence and radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2023;33(8):5578–86.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09511-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09511-5
Marth AA, Goller SS, Kajdi GW, Marcus RP, Sutter R. Photon-counting detector CT: clinical utility of virtual monoenergetic imaging combined with tin prefiltration to reduce metal artifacts in the postoperative ankle. Invest Radiol. 2024;59(8):545–53.
https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001058
Patzer TS, Grunz JP, Huflage H, Hennes JL, Pannenbecker P, Gruschwitz P, et al. Ultra-high resolution photon-counting CT with tin prefiltration for bone-metal interface visualization. Eur J Radiol. 2024;170:111209.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111209
Popp D, Sinzinger AX, Decker JA, Braun F, Bette S, Risch F, et al. Spectral metal artifact reduction after posterior spinal fixation in photon-counting detector CT datasets. Eur J Radiol. 2023;165:110946.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110946 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110946
Schreck J, Laukamp KR, Niehoff JH, Michael AE, Boriesosdick J, Wöltjen MM, et al. Metal artifact reduction in patients with total hip replacements: evaluation of clinical photon counting CT using virtual monoenergetic images. Eur Radiol. 2023;33(12):9286–95.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09879-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09879-4
Gnasso C, Pinos D, Schoepf UJ, Vecsey-Nagy M, Aquino GJ, Fink N, et al. Impact of reconstruction parameters on the accuracy of myocardial extracellular volume quantification on a first-generation, photon-counting detector CT. Eur Radiol Exp. 2024;8(1):70.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00469-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00469-7
Schoenbeck D, Sacha A, Niehoff JH, Moenninghoff C, Borggrefe J, Kroeger JR, et al. Imaging of hypodense gliotic lesions in photon counting computed tomography using virtual monoenergetic images. Neuroradiol J. 2024;37(3):336–41.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241240056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241240056
Chen J, Gandomkar Z, Reed WM. Investigating the impact of cognitive biases in radiologists’ image interpretation: a scoping review. Eur J Radiol. 2023;166:111013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111013
Sartoretti T, McDermott M, Mergen V, Euler A, Schmidt B, Jost G, et al. Photon-counting detector coronary CT angiography: impact of virtual monoenergetic imaging and iterative reconstruction on image quality. Br J Radiol. 2023;96(1143):20220466.
https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220466
Vattay B, Boussoussou M, Vecsey-Nagy M, Kolossváry M, Juhász D, Kerkovits N, et al. Qualitative and quantitative image quality of coronary CT angiography using photon-counting computed tomography: standard and ultra-high resolution protocols. Eur J Radiol. 2024;175:111426.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111426
Dillinger D, Overhoff D, Booz C, Kaatsch HL, Piechotka J, Hagen A, et al. Impact of CT photon-counting virtual monoenergetic imaging on visualization of abdominal arterial vessels. Diagnostics. 2023;13(5):938.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13050938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13050938
Edmund J, Feen Rønjom MF, van Overeem Felter M, Maare C, Margrete Juul Dam A, Tsaggari E, et al. Split-filter dual energy computed tomography radiotherapy: from calibration to image guidance. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023;28:100495.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100495
Fan N, Chen X, Li Y, Zhu Z, Chen X, Yang Z, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography with new virtual monoenergetic image reconstruction enhances prostate lesion image quality and improves the diagnostic efficacy for prostate cancer. BMC Med Imaging. 2024;24(1):212.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01393-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01393-3
Zopfs D, Laukamp KR, Pinto dos Santos D, Sokolowski M, Hokamp NG, Maintz D, et al. Low-keV virtual monoenergetic imaging reconstructions of excretory phase spectral dual-energy CT in patients with urothelial carcinoma: a feasibility study. Eur J Radiol. 2019;116:135–43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.05.003
Siemens Healthcare GmbH. Dual energy CT cookbook: a guide to monoenergetic plus imaging in RT. 2020. Available from: https://marketing.webassets.siemens-healthineers.com/45b718b41759787a/a8fa3ffa6e46/siemens-healthineers-ct_Dual_Energy_Cookbook.pdf
Lenga L, Czwikla R, Wichmann JL, Leithner D, Albrecht MH, D’Angelo T, et al. Dual-energy CT in patients with abdominal malignant ymphoma: impact of noise-optimised virtual monoenergetic imaging on objective and subjective image quality. Clin Radiol. 2018;73(9):833.e19–27.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2018.04.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2018.04.015
Martin SS, Kolaneci J, Czwikla R, Booz C, Gruenewald LD, Albrecht MH, et al. Dual-energy CT for the detection of portal vein thrombosis: improved diagnostic performance using virtual monoenergetic reconstructions. Diagnostics. 2022;12(7):1682.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071682 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071682
Lam S, Gupta R, Levental M, Yu E, Curtin HD, Forghani R. Optimal virtual monochromatic images for evaluation of normal tissues and head and neck cancer using dual-energy CT. Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(8):1518–24.
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4314
Schaller S, Wildberger JE, Raupach R, Niethammer M, Klingenbeck-Regn K, Flohr T. Spatial domain filtering for fast modification of the tradeoff between image sharpness and pixel noise in computed tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22(7):846–53.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2003.815073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2003.815073
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cecilie Valet Henneberg, Weronika Elżbieta Olech, Louis Mathias Dreyer Teller, Gitte Fredberg Persson, Michael Brun Andersen, Felix Christoph Müller, Claus Preibisch Behrens, Henriette Klitgaard Mortensen, Vicki Trier Taasti, Stine Elleberg Petersen, Henriette Lindberg, Vibeke Løgager, Jens Morgenthaler Edmund
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
