Principles to promote social equality across the cancer trajectory: A group concept mapping study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44738Keywords:
Oncology, Social vulnerability, Concept mapping, Inequality in HealthAbstract
Background and purpose: Social inequality is a growing problem throughout the cancer trajectory. Since 2019, the Danish Research Center for Equality in Cancer (COMPAS) has therefore, through seven work packages developed and tested various methodologies, approaches, and interventions to promote social equality in cancer from diagnosis to end of life. This study aimed to synthesize the knowledge generated across the work packages to provide guiding principles for promoting social equity across the cancer trajectory.
Material and methods: A group concept mapping study was conducted in Denmark between February and June 2023. Twenty-two employees from all COMPAS work packages brainstormed ideas on how to promote social equality across the cancer trajectory. Fourteen participants subsequently sorted and rated the ideas by importance. Multidimensional scaling analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis were used to generate a cluster rating map outlining principles for promoting social equality in cancer. These principles were validated by 10 participants during an in-person validation meeting. Discussions from both the brainstorming and validation meeting were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed.
Results: Eight principles comprising 162 ideas were identified. Four principles focused on the patient-provider level: (1) Person-centred approach, (2) Supportive interventions targeting vulnerable patients, (3) Communication, and (4) Screening for vulnerability. Four addressed the organizational and policy level: (5) Skills development and implementation, (6) Coherence across, (7) Organizational and cultural factors, and (8) Transportation and accessibility.
Interpretation: Integrating these principles into future research and clinical practice may support efforts to reduce social inequities across the cancer trajectory.
Downloads
References
Dalton SO, Schüz J, Engholm G, et al. Social inequality in incidence of and survival from cancer in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994–2003: summary of findings. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(14):2074–85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.06.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.06.018
Larsen SB, Olsen A, Lynch J, et al. Socioeconomic position and lifestyle in relation to breast cancer incidence among postmenopausal women: a prospective cohort study, Denmark, 1993–2006. Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;35(5):438–41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2010.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2010.12.005
Jansen L, Eberle A, Emrich K, et al. Socioeconomic deprivation and cancer survival in Germany: an ecological analysis in 200 districts in Germany. Int J Cancer. 2014;134(12):2951–60.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28624
Woods LM, Rachet B, Coleman MP. Origins of socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: a review. Ann Oncol. 2006;17(1):5–19.
https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdj007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdj007
Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, et al. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(1):7–12.
https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023531 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023531
Kim G, Qin J, Hall CB, et al. Association between socioeconomic and insurance status and delayed diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancers. J Surg Res. 2022;279:170–86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.05.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.05.027
Ammitzbøll G, Levinsen AKG, Kjær TK, et al. Socioeconomic inequality in cancer in the Nordic countries. A systematic review. Acta Oncol. 2022;61(11):1317–31.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186x.2022.2143278 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2022.2143278
Vaccarella S, Georges D, Bray F, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer mortality between and within countries in Europe: a population-based study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023;25:100551.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100551
Langballe R, Jakobsen E, Iachina M, et al. Who are the vulnerable lung cancer patients at risk for not receiving first-line curative or palliative treatment? Acta Oncol. 2023;62(10):1301–8.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186x.2023.2252581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2252581
Østgård LSG, Nørgaard M, Medeiros BC, et al. Effects of education and income on treatment and outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in a tax-supported health care system: a national population-based cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(32):3678–87.
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.73.6728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.73.6728
Holm LV, Hansen DG, Larsen PV, et al. Social inequality in cancer rehabilitation: a population-based cohort study. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(2):410–22.
https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186x.2012.745014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2012.745014
Moustsen IR, Larsen SB, Vibe-Petersen J, et al. Social position and referral to rehabilitation among cancer patients. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(5):720–6.
https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186x.2014.997836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2014.997836
Oksbjerg Dalton S, Halgren Olsen M, Moustsen IR, et al. Socioeconomic position, referral and attendance to rehabilitation after a cancer diagnosis: a population-based study in Copenhagen, Denmark 2010–2015. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(5):730–6.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186x.2019.1582800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1582800
Adsersen M, Thygesen LC, Neergaard MA, et al. Admittance to specialized palliative care (SPC) of patients with an assessed need: a study from the Danish palliative care database (DPD). Acta Oncol. 2017;56(9):1210–7.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186x.2017.1332425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2017.1332425
Hindhede AL, Bonde A, Schipperijn J, et al. How do socio-economic factors and distance predict access to prevention and rehabilitation services in a Danish municipality? Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016;17(6):578–85.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1463423616000268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423616000268
Neergaard MA, Jensen AB, Olesen F, et al. Access to outreach specialist palliative care teams among cancer patients in Denmark. J Palliat Med. 2013;16(8):951–7.
https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2012.0265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2012.0265
Elk R, Felder TM, Cayir E, et al. Social inequalities in palliative care for cancer patients in the United States: a structured review. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2018;34(3):303–15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2018.06.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2018.06.011
Levinsen AKG, Kjaer TK, Thygesen LC, et al. Social inequality in cancer survivorship: educational differences in health-related quality of life among 27,857 cancer survivors in Denmark. Cancer Med. 2023;12(19):20150–62.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6596
Denmark. Consolidated Health Act (Sundhedsloven). Chapter 1, Section 2. Copenhagen: Ministry of Health; 2022.
COMPAS. Danish Research Center for Equality in Cancer (COMPAS). [cited Aug 15]. Available from: https://www.compas.dk/
Kane M, Rosas S. Conversations about group concept mapping: applications, examples, and enhancements. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc; 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506329161
Trochim WM, McLinden D. Introduction to a special issue on concept mapping. Eval Program Plann. 2017;60:166–75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.10.006
The Concept System® groupwisdom™ (Build 2022.30.10) [Web-based Platform]. Ithaca, NY; 2022.
Rosas SR, Kane M. Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: a pooled study analysis. Eval Program Plann. 2012;35(2):236–45.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.10.003
The Danish Ministry of Health Announcement of law on science ethics treatment of projects in health research and health data research [Bekendtgørelse af lov om videnskabsetisk behandling af sundhedsvidenskabelige forskningsprojekter og sundhedsdatavidenskabelige forskningsprojekter]. The Danish Ministry of Health Copenhagen 2020.
Cooper LA, Ortega AN, Ammerman AS, et al. Calling for a bold new vision of health disparities intervention research. Am J Public Health. 2015;105 (Suppl 3):S374–6.
https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2014.302386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302386
Alcaraz KI, Wiedt TL, Daniels EC, et al. Understanding and addressing social determinants to advance cancer health equity in the United States: a blueprint for practice, research, and policy. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):31–46.
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21586 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21586
Warnecke RB, Oh A, Breen N, et al. Approaching health disparities from a population perspective: The National Institutes of Health Centers for Population Health and Health Disparities. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(9):1608–15.
https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2006.102525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.102525
Collet R, Major M, van Egmond M, et al. Experiences of interaction between people with cancer and their healthcare professionals: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2022;60:102198.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102198
Siminoff LA, Graham GC, Gordon NH. Cancer communication patterns and the influence of patient characteristics: disparities in information-giving and affective behaviors. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;62(3):355–60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.011
Smith SK, Dixon A, Trevena L, et al. Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(12):1805–12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.056
Friis K, Lasgaard M, Osborne RH, et al. Gaps in understanding health and engagement with healthcare providers across common long-term conditions: a population survey of health literacy in 29,473 Danish citizens. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e009627.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009627
Langballe R, Svendsen L, Jakobsen E, et al. Nurse navigation, symptom monitoring and exercise in vulnerable patients with lung cancer: feasibility of the NAVIGATE intervention. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):22744.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50161-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50161-w
Ruiz-Pérez I, Rodríguez-Gómez M, Pastor-Moreno G, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to improve cancer treatment and follow-up care in socially disadvantaged groups. Psychooncology. 2019;28(4):665–74.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5011
Ko NY, Darnell JS, Calhoun E, et al. Can patient navigation improve receipt of recommended breast cancer care? Evidence from the National Patient Navigation Research Program. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(25):2758–64.
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.53.6037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.53.6037
Chan RJ, Milch VE, Crawford-Williams F, et al. Patient navigation across the cancer care continuum: an overview of systematic reviews and emerging literature. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(6):565–89.
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21788 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21788
Rodday AM, Parsons SK, Snyder F, et al. Impact of patient navigation in eliminating economic disparities in cancer care. Cancer. 2015;121(22):4025–34.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29612
Garcia MV, Agar MR, Soo WK, et al. Screening tools for identifying older adults with cancer who may benefit from a geriatric assessment: a systematic review. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(4):616–27.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6736
Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005;173(5):489–95.
https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050051
Magnuson A, Sattar S, Nightingale G, et al. A practical guide to geriatric syndromes in older adults with cancer: a focus on falls, cognition, polypharmacy, and depression. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019;39:e96–109.
https://doi.org/10.1200/edbk_237641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_237641
Møller JK, la Cour K, Pilegaard MS, et al. Identification of socially vulnerable cancer patients – development of a register-based index (rSVI). Support Care Cancer. 2022;30(6):5277–87.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06937-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06937-3
Gandra EC, da Silva KL, Costa Schreck RS, et al. Teaching strategies to develop skills to address social inequalities in nursing education: a scoping review. Nurs Educ Today. 2023;121:105697.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105697 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105697
Tan X, Camacho F, Marshall VD, et al. Geographic disparities in adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in Appalachian women with breast cancer. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017;13(4):796–810.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.08.004
Rouhafzay A, Yousefi J. Geographical disparities in colorectal cancer in Canada: a review. Curr Oncol Rep. 2024;26(10):1249–57.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-024-01574-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-024-01574-x
Goncalves Leite Rocco P, Reategui-Rivera CM, Finkelstein J. Telemedicine applications for cancer rehabilitation: scoping review. JMIR Cancer. 2024;10:e56969.
https://doi.org/10.2196/56969 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/56969
Rossen S, Kayser L, Vibe-Petersen J, et al. Technology in exercise-based cancer rehabilitation: a cross-sectional study of receptiveness and readiness for e-Health utilization in Danish cancer rehabilitation. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(5):610–8.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186x.2018.1562213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2018.1562213
Grant SJ, Yanguela J, Odebunmi O, et al. systematic review of interventions addressing racial and ethnic disparities in cancer care and health outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(13):1563–74.
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.23.01290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.01290
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Aagesen, Eva E. Wæhrens, Pernille Bidstrup, Gunn Ammitzbøll, Hanne Tønnesen, Eva Kjeldsted, Susanne O. Dalton, Karen la Cour
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
