Detection of disease recurrence in real-world patients with completely resected stage III cutaneous melanoma

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2026.45609

Keywords:

Melanoma Cutaneous Malignant, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Whole body imaging, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Recurrence, Follow-up studies

Abstract

Background and purpose: Optimal postoperative follow-up for high-risk cutaneous melanomas (CM) is unclear. We aimed to evaluate disease recurrences in patients with stage III CM before modern adjuvant therapies.
Patient/material and methods: Three hundred and fifty patients with a median follow-up of 8.9 years at Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center after complete resection of stage IIIA–D CM between 2008 and 2017 were identified. Information on baseline characteristics, recurrence patterns and survival were collected from electronic medical records.
Results: One hundred and ninety patients (54.3%) developed disease recurrence with 258 recurrence events documented. Local recurrence occurred in 14.5, 27.0, 32.3 and 44.4% and distant metastases in 21.7, 40.5, 52.4 and 83.3% of patients with stage IIIA, IIIB, IIID and IIID, respectively. Median recurrence-free survival was not reached and 7.4 years in stage IIIA and IIIB compared to 2.9 and 0.9 years in IIIC and IIID. Routine computed tomography (CT) imaging revealed 51% of all recurrences and 64% of distant meta­stases. 13.2% of distant recurrences involved skin and soft tissues, 31.4 lungs, 34.0 other visceral organs and 21.5% brain. First recurrences occurred mostly during the first 2 years of follow-up (59.5–100% in stage IIIB–D) except for stage IIIA (45.0%). Most of recurrences detected by patients (58.0%), physical exams or ultrasound (76.1%) and routine CT (61.2%) occurred during the first 2 years.
Interpretation: High rate of recurrences and distant metastases supports routine physical exams and CT particularly during the first years of postoperative follow-up, especially in stage IIIB–D CM.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Saginala K, Barsouk A, Aluru JS, Rawla P, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of melanoma. Med Sci. 2021;9(4):63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci9040063

Syöpärekisteri [Internet]. [cited 2024 Oct 14]. Syöpätilastosovellus. Available from: https://syoparekisteri.fi/tilastot/tautitilastot/

SEER. Melanoma of the skin – cancer stat facts [Internet]. [cited 2025 Sep 30]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/melan.html

Lee KA, Nathan P. Cutaneous melanoma – a review of systemic therapies. Acta Derm Venereol. 2020;100(11):adv00141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3496

Amaral T, Ottaviano M, Arance A, Blank C, Chiarion-Sileni V, Donia M, et al. Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up☆. Ann Oncol. 2025;36(1):10–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2024.11.006

Long GV, Swetter SM, Menzies AM, Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA. Cutaneous melanoma. Lancet. 2023;402(10400):485–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00821-8

Ascierto PA, Del Vecchio M, Mandalá M, Gogas H, Arance AM, Dalle S, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage IIIB–C and stage IV melanoma (CheckMate 238): 4-year results from a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(11):1465–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30494-0

Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson VG, Dalle S, et al. Longer follow-up confirms recurrence-free survival benefit of adjuvant pembrolizumab in high-risk stage III melanoma: updated results from the EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054 trial. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2020;38(33):3925–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.02110

Hauschild A, Dummer R, Schadendorf D, Santinami M, Atkinson V, Mandalà M, et al. Longer follow-up confirms relapse-free survival benefit with adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with resected BRAF V600-mutant stage III melanoma. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2018;36(35):3441–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01219

Johansson ALV, Kønig SM, Larønningen S, Engholm G, Kroman N, Seppä K, et al. Have the recent advancements in cancer therapy and survival benefitted patients of all age groups across the Nordic countries? NORDCAN survival analyses 2002–2021. Acta Oncol. 2024;63:35094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.35094

Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA, Hess KR, Sondak VK, Long GV, Ross MI, et al. Melanoma staging: evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Cancer Staging Manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(6):472–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21409

Helvind NM, Brinch-Møller Weitemeyer M, Chakera AH, Hendel HW, Ellebæk E, Svane IM, et al. Stage-specific risk of recurrence and death from melanoma in Denmark, 2008–2021. JAMA Dermatol. 2023;159(11):1213–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.3256

Vuoristo M, Muhonen T, Koljonen V, Juteau S, Hernberg M, Ilmonen S, et al. Long-term prognostic value of sentinel lymph node tumor burden in survival of melanoma patients. Acta Oncol. 2021;60(6):803–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1892820

Blank CU, Lucas MW, Scolyer RA, van de Wiel BA, Menzies AM, Lopez-Yurda M, et al. Neoadjuvant nivolumab and ipilimumab in resectable stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(18):1696–708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2402604

Neoadjuvant–adjuvant or adjuvant-only pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med [Internet]. [cited 2025 Nov 17]. Available from: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2211437

Karunamurthy A, Wang H, Buchbinder EI, Rapisuwon S, Cohen JV, Gibney GT, et al. Randomized phase II study of neoadjuvant (neoadj) anti-PD-1 dostarlimab (D) vs. D + anti-TIM-3 cobolimab (C) in high-risk resectable melanoma (mel) (NEO-MEL-T): primary analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(17_Suppl.):LBA9504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2025.43.17_suppl.LBA9504

Johnston L, Starkey S, Mukovozov I, Robertson L, Petrella T, Alhusayen R. Surveillance after a previous cutaneous melanoma diagnosis: a scoping review of melanoma follow-up guidelines. J Cutan Med Surg. 2023;27(5):516–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/12034754231188434

Yan MK, Adler NR, Wolfe R, Pan Y, Chamberlain A, Kelly J, et al. The role of surveillance imaging for resected high-risk melanoma. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2023;19(4):566–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13913

Sullivan FG, Adler KB, Boudreaux MD, Hensley LM, Roberts ME, Liles JS, et al. Stage-based detection methods and recurrence patterns for cutaneous melanoma. Am Surg. 2024;90(7):1963–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241241718

Park TS, Phan GQ, Yang JC, Kammula U, Hughes MS, Trebska-McGowan K, et al. Routine computer tomography imaging for the detection of recurrences in high-risk melanoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(4):947–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5768-8

Romano E, Scordo M, Dusza SW, Coit DG, Chapman PB. Site and timing of first relapse in stage III melanoma patients: implications for follow-up guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(18):3042–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.26.2063

Ladjevardi CO, Naeser Y, Dyrke U, Papantoniou D, Bagge RO, Elander N, et al. Physical examinations and whole-body imaging versus physical examinations alone during follow-up after radical surgery of stage IIB–C and III cutaneous malignant melanoma (TRIM): an interim analysis of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial in Sweden. Lancet Oncol. 2025;26(11):1501–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00487-5

Schwantes IR, Sutton T, Behrens S, Fowler G, Han G, Vetto JT, et al. Metastasectomy for metastatic melanoma in the era of effective systemic therapy. Am J Surg. 2024;231:65–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.04.020

Poklepovic AS, Carvajal RD. Prognostic value of low tumor burden in patients with melanoma. Oncol Williston Park N. 2018;32(9):e90–6.

Ibrahim AM, Le May M, Bossé D, Marginean H, Song X, Nessim C, et al. Imaging intensity and survival outcomes in high-risk resected melanoma treated by systemic therapy at recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(10):3683–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08407-8

Joseph RW, Elassaiss-Schaap J, Kefford R, Hwu WJ, Wolchok JD, Joshua AM, et al. Baseline tumor size is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with melanoma treated with pembrolizumab. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2018;24(20):4960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2386

Schadendorf D, Long GV, Stroiakovski D, Karaszewska B, Hauschild A, Levchenko E, et al. Three-year pooled analysis of factors associated with clinical outcomes across dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy phase 3 randomised trials. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990. 2017;82:45–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.033

Helsedirektoratet. Anbefalinger om kontrollenes hyppighet og bruk av bildediagnostikk [Internet]. [cited 2026 May 3]. Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/retningslinjer/melanomer-handlingsprogram/oppfolging-og-etterkontroll-etter-avsluttet-kurativ-behandling/anbefalinger-om-kontrollenes-hyppighet-og-bruk-av-bildediagnostikk

Larkin J, Del Vecchio M, Mandalá M, Gogas H, Arance Fernandez AM, Dalle S, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III/IV melanoma: 5-year efficacy and biomarker results from CheckMate 238. Clin Cancer Res. 2023;29(17):3352–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-3145

Eggermont AM, Kicinski M, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson V, et al. Seven-year analysis of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in stage III melanoma in the EORTC1325 / KEYNOTE-054 trial. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990. 2024;211:114327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114327

Dummer R, Hauschild A, Santinami M, Atkinson V, Mandalà M, Kirkwood JM, et al. Five-year analysis of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib in stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(12):1139–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2005493

Isaksson K, Katsarelias D, Mikiver R, Carneiro A, Ny L, Olofsson Bagge R. A population-based comparison of the AJCC 7th and AJCC 8th editions for patients diagnosed with stage III cutaneous malignant melanoma in Sweden. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(9):2839–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07448-y

Leiter U, Stadler R, Mauch C, Hohenberger W, Brockmeyer NH, Berking C, et al. Final analysis of DeCOG-SLT trial: no survival benefit for complete lymph node dissection in patients with melanoma with positive sentinel node. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2019;37(32):3000–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.02306

Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trials Study Group. Therapeutic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with melanoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2022;157(9):835–42.

Costa DR, Winge-Main AK, Skog A, Tsuruda KM, Robsahm TE, Andreassen BK. From trials to practice: immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for melanoma patients in Norway. Acta Oncol. 2024;63:41266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.41266

Additional Files

Published

2026-06-08

How to Cite

Peuranheimo, T., Hellman, A., Mäkelä, S., Mattila, K., & Hernberg, M. (2026). Detection of disease recurrence in real-world patients with completely resected stage III cutaneous melanoma. Acta Oncologica, 65, 535–542. https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2026.45609