Collagenase clostridium histolyticum for Dupuytren’s disease: a comprehensive systematic review and comparative analysis against percutaneous needle aponeurotomy and limited fasciectomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v60.42750Keywords:
Dupuytren’s contracture, collagenase clostridium histolyticum, percutaneous needle aponeurotomy, limited fasciectomyAbstract
This systematic review compared the efficacy of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) against percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA) and limited fasciectomy (LF) for Dupuytren’s contracture. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to March 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Primary outcomes included successful contracture correction as defined by included studies. Secondary outcomes included recurrence rates, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse events. A total of 11 studies (969 patients) were included. Meta-analysis showed no difference in efficacy between CCH and PNA (Relative Risk [RR]: 1.01, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.93–1.09). Recurrence rates were also similar (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.95–1.48). Data suggested higher recurrence risk with CCH versus LF (RR: 6.84, 95% CI: 1.59–29.48). In some studies, CCH was associated with higher rates of haematoma, local pain, and oedema. CCH demonstrates comparable efficacy to PNA; however, it may have a higher risk of local complications and recurrence compared to LF. Treatment decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis.
Downloads
References
Hueston J, Tubiana R. Dupuytren’s disease. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh; 1974.
Badalamente MA, Stern L, Hurst LC. The pathogenesis of Dupuytren’s contracture: contractile mechanisms of the myofibroblasts. J Hand Surg Am. 1983;8(3):235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-5023(83)80150-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(83)80150-6
Peltier LF. Guillaume Dupuytren and Dupuytren’s fracture. Surgery. 1958;43(5):868–874.
Sayadi LR, Alhunayan D, Sarantopoulos N, et al. The molecular pathogenesis of Dupuytren disease: review of the literature and suggested new approaches to treatment. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;83(5):594–600. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000001918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001918
Riester S, van Wijnen A, Rizzo M, et al. Pathogenesis and treatment of Dupuytren disease. JBJS Rev. 2014;2(4):e2. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.Rvw.M.00072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.M.00072
Hurst LC, Badalamente MA, Hentz VR, et al. Injectable collagenase clostridium histolyticum for Dupuytren’s contracture. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(10):968–979. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0810866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0810866
Hueston JT. Dupuytren’s contracture: the trend to conservatism. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1965;36(3):134–151.
Eaton C. Percutaneous fasciotomy for Dupuytren’s contracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(5):910–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.02.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.02.016
Foucher G, Medina J, Navarro R. Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy: complications and results. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(5):427–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-7681(03)00013-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-7681(03)00013-5
Hueston JT. Limited fasciectomy for Dupuytren’s contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1961;27:569–585. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196106000-00001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196106000-00001
Zachariae L. Dupuytren’s contracture. How limited should a limited fasciectomy be? Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):145–149. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036705
Starkweather KD, Lattuga S, Hurst LC, et al. Collagenase in the treatment of Dupuytren’s disease: an in vitro study. J Hand Surg Am. 1996;21(3):490–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-5023(96)80368-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(96)80368-6
Badalamente MA, Hurst LC. Efficacy and safety of injectable mixed collagenase subtypes in the treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32(6):767–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.04.002
Badalamente MA, Hurst LC. Enzyme injection as nonsurgical treatment of Dupuytren’s disease. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(4):629–636. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2000.6918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2000.6918
Watt AJ, Curtin CM, Hentz VR. Collagenase injection as nonsurgical treatment of Dupuytren’s disease: 8-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(4):534–539, 539.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.01.003
Pess GM, Pess RM, Pess RA. Results of needle aponeurotomy for Dupuytren contracture in over 1,000 fingers. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(4):651–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.01.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.01.029
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-44
Bernabé B, Lasbleiz S, Gerber RA, et al. URAM scale for functional assessment in Dupuytren’s disease: a comparative study of its properties. Joint Bone Spine. 2014;81(5):441–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2014.01.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2014.01.007
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program] Version 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2020.
Scherman P, Jenmalm P, Dahlin LB. One-year results of needle fasciotomy and collagenase injection in treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture: a two-centre prospective randomized clinical trial. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016;41(6):577–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193415617385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193415617385
Strömberg J, Ibsen-Sörensen A, Fridén J. Comparison of treatment outcome after collagenase and needle fasciotomy for Dupuytren contracture: a randomized, single-blinded, clinical trial with a 1-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41(9):873–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.06.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.06.014
Skov ST, Bisgaard T, Søndergaard P, et al. Injectable collagenase versus percutaneous needle fasciotomy for Dupuytren contracture in proximal interphalangeal joints: A randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42(5):321–328.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.003
Strömberg J, Vanek P, Fridén J, et al. Ultrasonographic examination of the ruptured cord after collagenase treatment or needle fasciotomy for Dupuytren’s contracture. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017;42(7):683–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193417711594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193417711594
Scherman P, Jenmalm P, Dahlin LB. Three-year recurrence of Dupuytren’s contracture after needle fasciotomy and collagenase injection: a two-centre randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018;43(8):836–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193418786947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193418786947
Strömberg J, Ibsen Sörensen A, Fridén J. Percutaneous needle fasciotomy versus collagenase treatment for Dupuytren contracture: a randomized controlled trial with a two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(13):1079–1086. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.01128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01128
Abe Y. Comparison of treatment outcomes after collagenase injection and percutaneous needle fasciotomy for Dupuytren’s contracture: objective and subjective comparisons with a 3-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(6):1464–1474. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000006828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006828
Byström M, Ibsen Sörensen A, Samuelsson K, et al. Five-year results of a randomized, controlled trial of collagenase treatment compared with needle fasciotomy for Dupuytren contracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2022;47(3):211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.11.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.11.019
Jørgensen RW, Jensen CH, Jørring S. Three-year recurrence of Dupuytren contracture after needle fasciotomy or collagenase injection: a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;151(2):365–371. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000009847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009848
Räisänen MP, Leppänen OV, Soikkeli J, et al. Surgery, needle fasciotomy, or collagenase injection for Dupuytren contracture: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2024;177(3):280–290. https://doi.org/10.7326/m23-1485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M23-1485
Shauver MJ, Chung KC. The Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire after 15 years of field trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):779e–787e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865d83 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865d83
Thoma A, Murphy J, Gallo L, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of collagenase injection (Xiaflex®) and palmar fasciectomy in the management of Dupuytren’s contracture. Plastic Surgery. 2024;32(4):659–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231161066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231161066
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jevan Cevik, Rohan Rajaram, Michaela Pollock, Ishith Seth, Warren M. Rozen
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica Society owns the copyright for all material published until Volume 57 (2023) unless otherwise specified. As from Volume 59 (2024) all published articles, unless otherwise specified, are published under CC-BY licences, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, with the condition of proper attribution to the original work.