Collagenase clostridium histolyticum for Dupuytren’s disease: a comprehensive systematic review and comparative analysis against percutaneous needle aponeurotomy and limited fasciectomy

Authors

  • Jevan Cevik Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, Victoria, Australia; Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
  • Rohan Rajaram Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, Victoria, Australia; Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
  • Michaela Pollock Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, Victoria, Australia; Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
  • Ishith Seth Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, Victoria, Australia; Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
  • Warren M. Rozen Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, Victoria, Australia; Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v60.42750

Keywords:

Dupuytren’s contracture, collagenase clostridium histolyticum, percutaneous needle aponeurotomy, limited fasciectomy

Abstract

This systematic review compared the efficacy of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) against percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA) and limited fasciectomy (LF) for Dupuytren’s contracture. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to March 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Primary outcomes included successful contracture correction as defined by included studies. Secondary outcomes included recurrence rates, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse events. A total of 11 studies (969 patients) were included. Meta-analysis showed no difference in efficacy between CCH and PNA (Relative Risk [RR]: 1.01, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.93–1.09). Recurrence rates were also similar (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.95–1.48). Data suggested higher recurrence risk with CCH versus LF (RR: 6.84, 95% CI: 1.59–29.48). In some studies, CCH was associated with higher rates of haematoma, local pain, and oedema. CCH demonstrates comparable efficacy to PNA; however, it may have a higher risk of local complications and recurrence compared to LF. Treatment decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hueston J, Tubiana R. Dupuytren’s disease. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh; 1974.

Badalamente MA, Stern L, Hurst LC. The pathogenesis of Dupuytren’s contracture: contractile mechanisms of the myofibroblasts. J Hand Surg Am. 1983;8(3):235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-5023(83)80150-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(83)80150-6

Peltier LF. Guillaume Dupuytren and Dupuytren’s fracture. Surgery. 1958;43(5):868–874.

Sayadi LR, Alhunayan D, Sarantopoulos N, et al. The molecular pathogenesis of Dupuytren disease: review of the literature and suggested new approaches to treatment. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;83(5):594–600. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.​0000000000001918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001918

Riester S, van Wijnen A, Rizzo M, et al. Pathogenesis and treatment of Dupuytren disease. JBJS Rev. 2014;2(4):e2. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.Rvw.M.00072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.M.00072

Hurst LC, Badalamente MA, Hentz VR, et al. Injectable collagenase clostridium histolyticum for Dupuytren’s contracture. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(10):968–979. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0810866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0810866

Hueston JT. Dupuytren’s contracture: the trend to conservatism. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1965;36(3):134–151.

Eaton C. Percutaneous fasciotomy for Dupuytren’s contracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(5):910–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.02.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.02.016

Foucher G, Medina J, Navarro R. Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy: complications and results. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(5):427–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-7681(03)00013-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-7681(03)00013-5

Hueston JT. Limited fasciectomy for Dupuytren’s contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1961;27:569–585. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196106000-00001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196106000-00001

Zachariae L. Dupuytren’s contracture. How limited should a limited fasciectomy be? Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):145–149. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036705

Starkweather KD, Lattuga S, Hurst LC, et al. Collagenase in the treatment of Dupuytren’s disease: an in vitro study. J Hand Surg Am. 1996;21(3):490–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-5023(96)80368-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(96)80368-6

Badalamente MA, Hurst LC. Efficacy and safety of injectable mixed collagenase subtypes in the treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32(6):767–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.04.002

Badalamente MA, Hurst LC. Enzyme injection as nonsurgical treatment of Dupuytren’s disease. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(4):629–636. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2000.6918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2000.6918

Watt AJ, Curtin CM, Hentz VR. Collagenase injection as nonsurgical treatment of Dupuytren’s disease: 8-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(4):534–539, 539.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.01.003

Pess GM, Pess RM, Pess RA. Results of needle aponeurotomy for Dupuytren contracture in over 1,000 fingers. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(4):651–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.01.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.01.029

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-44

Bernabé B, Lasbleiz S, Gerber RA, et al. URAM scale for functional assessment in Dupuytren’s disease: a comparative study of its properties. Joint Bone Spine. 2014;81(5):441–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2014.01.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2014.01.007

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program] Version 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2020.

Scherman P, Jenmalm P, Dahlin LB. One-year results of needle fasciotomy and collagenase injection in treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture: a two-centre prospective randomized clinical trial. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016;41(6):577–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193415617385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193415617385

Strömberg J, Ibsen-Sörensen A, Fridén J. Comparison of treatment outcome after collagenase and needle fasciotomy for Dupuytren contracture: a randomized, single-blinded, clinical trial with a 1-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41(9):873–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.​2016.06.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.06.014

Skov ST, Bisgaard T, Søndergaard P, et al. Injectable collagenase versus percutaneous needle fasciotomy for Dupuytren contracture in proximal interphalangeal joints: A randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42(5):321–328.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.003

Strömberg J, Vanek P, Fridén J, et al. Ultrasonographic examination of the ruptured cord after collagenase treatment or needle fasciotomy for Dupuytren’s contracture. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017;42(7):683–688. https://doi.org/​10.1177/1753193417711594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193417711594

Scherman P, Jenmalm P, Dahlin LB. Three-year recurrence of Dupuytren’s contracture after needle fasciotomy and collagenase injection: a two-centre randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018;43(8):836–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193418786947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193418786947

Strömberg J, Ibsen Sörensen A, Fridén J. Percutaneous needle fasciotomy versus collagenase treatment for Dupuytren contracture: a randomized controlled trial with a two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(13):1079–1086. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.01128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01128

Abe Y. Comparison of treatment outcomes after collagenase injection and percutaneous needle fasciotomy for Dupuytren’s contracture: objective and subjective comparisons with a 3-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(6):1464–1474. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000006828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006828

Byström M, Ibsen Sörensen A, Samuelsson K, et al. Five-year results of a randomized, controlled trial of collagenase treatment compared with needle fasciotomy for Dupuytren contracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2022;47(3):211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.11.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.11.019

Jørgensen RW, Jensen CH, Jørring S. Three-year recurrence of Dupuytren contracture after needle fasciotomy or collagenase injection: a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;151(2):365–371. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000009847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009848

Räisänen MP, Leppänen OV, Soikkeli J, et al. Surgery, needle fasciotomy, or collagenase injection for Dupuytren contracture: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2024;177(3):280–290. https://doi.org/10.7326/m23-1485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M23-1485

Shauver MJ, Chung KC. The Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire after 15 years of field trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):779e–787e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.​0b013e​3182865d83 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865d83

Thoma A, Murphy J, Gallo L, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of collagenase injection (Xiaflex®) and palmar fasciectomy in the management of Dupuytren’s contracture. Plastic Surgery. 2024;32(4):659–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231161066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231161066

Published

2025-02-13

How to Cite

Cevik, J., Rajaram, R., Pollock, M., Seth, I., & M. Rozen, W. (2025). Collagenase clostridium histolyticum for Dupuytren’s disease: a comprehensive systematic review and comparative analysis against percutaneous needle aponeurotomy and limited fasciectomy. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, 60(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v60.42750

Issue

Section

Review Articles