The effect of muscle defect size on donor site hernia and bulge after transverse rectus abdominis flap
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v60.42961Keywords:
Hernia, rectus abdominis muscle, transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flapAbstract
Background: Muscle sparing-transverse rectus abdominis flap has been widely used for breast reconstruction and the abdominal hernia or bulging at the donor site is relatively common complication. Previous studies have emphasized the fascial defects and the defect of muscle has been neglected. This study aims to investigate the relationship between the size of the rectus abdominis muscle defect and its impact on hernia or bulge formation after muscle sparing-transverse rectus abdominis flap.
Materials and methods: A retrospective study of patients undergoing unilateral or bilateral breast reconstruction with muscle sparing-transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap was performed. We compared the patient group with postoperative abdominal hernia or bulging requiring surgery with the patient group without hernia. The surgical specific data of the size of rectus abdominis muscle defect, muscle sparing type and flap weight are analyzed.
Results: We conducted a survey on a total of 160 patients, of which six patients experienced abdominal hernia or bulging requiring surgery. Comparing patient group requiring surgical treatment for hernia or bulging with patient group without hernia, there was a significant difference of the width of rectus abdominis muscle defect. The cut-off value of the width was 4.5 cm.
Conclusion: When performing MS-TRAM, minimizing the resection of rectus abdominis muscle remains crucial, especially the horizontal width.
Downloads
References
Hartrampf C, Scheflan M, Black PW. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69:216–225. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198202000-00007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198202000-00007
Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg. 1989;42:645–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(89)90075-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(89)90075-1
Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199401000-00007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199401000-00007
Egeberg A, Rasmussen MK, Sorensen JA. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2012;65:1474–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2012.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2012.07.001
Wu LC, Bajaj A, Chang DW, Chevray PM. Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:702–709. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181823c15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181823c15
Futter CM, Webster MH, Hagen S, Mitchell SL. A retrospective comparison of abdominal muscle strength following breast reconstruction with a free TRAM or DIEP flap. Br J Plast Surg. 2000;53:578–583. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.2000.3427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.2000.3427
Rossetto LA, Alba LE, Vidal R et al. Factors associated with hernia and bulge formation at the donor site of the pedicled TRAM flap. Eur J Plast Surg. 2010;33(4):203–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-010-0418-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-010-0418-4
Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA, et al. Comprehensive analysis of donor site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1383–1391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a805a3
Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH et al. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(5):1519–1526. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816b1458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816b1458
Kroll SS, Marchi M. Comparison of strategies for preventing abdominal-wall weakness after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(6):1045–1051. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199206000-00007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199206000-00007
Spear SL, Walker RK. The external oblique flap for reconstruction of the rectus sheath. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:608–613. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199210000-00009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199210000-00009
Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Mistry D. The internal oblique repair of abdominal bulges secondary to TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(1):100–104. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199507000-00015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199507000-00015
Amir A, Siflen R, Hauben DJ. Rotation flap of the anterior rectus abdominis sheath for hernia prevention in TRAM breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:207. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SAP.0000029631.35768.1B DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SAP.0000029631.35768.1B
Siegwart LC, Sieber L, Fischer S, et al. The use of semi-absorbable mesh and its impact on donor-site morbidity and patient-reported outcomes in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45:907–1916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-02096-0
Cicilioni Jr O, Araujo G, Mimbs N, Cox MD. Initial experience with the use of porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice) for abdominal wall reinforcement after transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:265–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822af89d DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822af89d
Brunbjerg ME, Jensen TB, Christiansen P, Overgaard J, Engberg Damsgaard T. Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh after breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. A prospective double-blind randomized study. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2021;55:202–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2020.1856673
Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. ‘Components separation’ method for closure of abdominal wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:519–526. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199009000-00023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199009000-00023
Glasberg SB, D’Amico RA. Use of regenerative human acellular tissue (AlloDerm) to reconstruct the abdominal wall following pedicle TRAM flap breast reconstruction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(1):8–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000220470.97776.f5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000220470.97776.f5
Brunbjerg ME, Jensen TB, Christiansen P, et al. Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal matrix or synthetic. mesh after breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. A prospective double-blind randomized study. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2021;55(4):202–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2020.1856673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2020.1856673
Lindenblatt N, Gruenherz L, Farhadi J. A systematic review of donor site aesthetic and complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2019;8(4):389–398. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2019.06.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2019.06.05
Kim J, Lee KT, Mun GH. Short fasciotomy-deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvest for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;152(6):972e–984e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010382
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yumin Kim, Ji-Young Kim, Hak Chang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica Society owns the copyright for all material published until Volume 57 (2023) unless otherwise specified. As from 2024 all published articles, unless otherwise specified, are published under CC-BY licences, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, with the condition of proper attribution to the original work.

