Uncovering the carbon cost: Environmental impact of free flap reconstruction procedures in the UK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v60.43375Keywords:
Free flap reconstruction, deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, anterolateral thigh flap, global warming, carbon footprint, healthcare system, climate changeAbstract
Introduction: Free flap reconstruction procedures are renowned for their duration and the requirement for many staff and large quantities of equipment. This single-centre cross-sectional study aimed to quantify the total emissions related to two such procedures carried out at a district general hospital.
Methods: One deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap procedure and one anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap procedure, both carried out in February 2024, were analysed. Data related to staff transport, anaesthetic duration, mass of disposable equipment, quantity of reusable surgical equipment and consumption of electricity and heating for the relevant theatre areas were collected. Emissions were calculated using UK government conversion factors and classified by scope and contributory element as per the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.
Results: Total emissions were estimated at 385.5 kgCO2eq for the DIEP and 369.6 kgCO2eq for the ALT. Scope 1 emissions related to heating, atmospheric release of general anaesthetic and incineration of waste accounted for 33.7% of DIEP emissions and 35.6% of ALT emissions. Scope 2 emissions related to the use of grid electricity accounted for 44.8% of DIEP emissions and 46.7% of ALT emissions. Scope 3 emissions related to staff transport, cleaning of reusable equipment and the supply chain for disposable equipment accounted for 21.5% of DIEP emissions and 17.7% of ALT emissions.
Conclusion: Significant reductions in emissions may be achievable without significant infrastructural changes through initiatives to reduce staff transport by single-occupancy car, improving the energy efficiency of the theatre areas and reducing the use of single-use surgical equipment.
Downloads
References
Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, et al. Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. Lancet. 2009; 373: 1693–1733. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1
Klepac P, Hsieh JL, Ducker CL, et al. Climate change, malaria and neglected tropical diseases: a scoping review. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2024; 118: 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trae026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trae026
Mirzabaev A, Bezner Kerr R, Hasegawa T, et al. Severe climate change risks to food security and nutrition. Clim Risk Manag. 2023; 39: 100473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2022.100473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2022.100473
Misra AK. Climate change and challenges of water and food security. Int J Sustain Built Environ. 2014; 3: 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.04.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.04.006
Ofremu GO, Raimi BY, Yusuf SO, et al. Exploring the relationship between climate change, air pollutants and human health: impacts, adaptation, and mitigation strategies. Green Energ Resour. 2024: 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerr.2024.100074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerr.2024.100074
Ebi KL, Vanos J, Baldwin JW, et al. Extreme weather and climate change: population health and health system implications. Ann Rev Public Health. 2021; 42: 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-012420-105026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-012420-105026
Curtis S, Fair A, Wistow J, et al. Impact of extreme weather events and climate change for health and social care systems. Environ Health. 2017; 16: 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0324-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0324-3
O’Donnell O. Health and health system effects on poverty: a narrative review of global evidence. Health Policy. 2024; 142: 105018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105018
Bianco G, Espinoza-Chávez RM, Ashigbie PG, et al. Projected impact of climate change on human health in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2024; 8: e015550. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015550
Ragavan MI, Marcil LE, Garg A. Climate change as a social determinant of health. Pediatrics. 2020; 145: e20193169. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-3169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-3169
Tennison I, Roschnik S, Ashby B, et al. Health care’s response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England. Lancet Planet Health. 2021; 5: e84–e92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30271-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30271-0
Rodríguez-Jiménez L, Romero-Martín M, Spruell T, et al. The carbon footprint of healthcare settings: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2023; 79: 2830–2844. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15671
NHS. Delivering a ‘Net Zero’ National Health Service [Internet]. n.d. https://www.england.nhs.uk/greenernhs/publication/delivering-a-net-zero-national-health-service/ (accessed February 14, 2024).
Health and Care Act 2022 n.d. [cited 2024 Feb 14]. Available from:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2022/31/contents/enacted
Morris DS, Wright T, Somner JEA, et al. The carbon footprint of cataract surgery. Eye (Lond). 2013; 27: 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2013.9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2013.9
Campion N, Thiel CL, DeBlois J, et al. Life cycle assessment perspectives on delivering an infant in the US. Sci Total Environ. 2012; 425: 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.006
Thiel CL, Eckelman M, Guido R, et al. Environmental impacts of surgical procedures: life cycle assessment of hysterectomy in the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2015; 49: 1779–86. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504719g DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es504719g
Tan E, Lim D. Carbon footprint of dermatologic surgery. Aust J Dermatol. 2021; 62: e170–e177. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.13522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.13522
Carbon footprint of dermatologic surgery – PubMed [Internet]. n.d. [cited 2024 Feb 14]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33277919/
Maheshwari K, Epanomeritakis IE, Hills S, Hindocha S. Carbon footprint of a laser unit: a study of two centres in the UK. Lasers Med Sci 2024; 39: 134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04081-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04081-4
MacNeill AJ, Lillywhite R, Brown CJ. The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems. Lancet Planet Health. 2017; 1: e381–e388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30162-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30162-6
Greenhouse gas reporting: conversion factors 2021 [Internet]. GOVUK 2022 [cited 2024 Feb 08]. Available from:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/greenhouse-gas-reporting-conversion-factors-2021
Andersen MPS, Nielsen OJ, Sherman JD. Assessing the potential climate impact of anaesthetic gases. Lancet Planet Health. 2023; 7: e622–e629. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00084-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00084-0
Trainline: search, compare & buy cheap train tickets [Internet]. n.d. [cited 2024 Oct 31]. Available from: https://www.thetrainline.com/
Drew J, Christie SD, Tyedmers P, et al. Operating in a climate crisis: a state-of-the-science review of life cycle assessment within surgical and anesthetic care. Environ Health Perspect. 2021; 129: 076001. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP8666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP8666
Hu X, Pierce JT, Taylor T, et al. The carbon footprint of general anaesthetics: a case study in the UK. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021; 167: 105411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105411
Department for Transport, Office for Zero Emission Vehicles. Consulting on ending the sale of new petrol, diesel and hybrid cars and vans [Internet]. GOVUK 2020 [cited 2024 Oct 31]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/consulting-on-ending-the-sale-of-new-petrol-diesel-and-hybrid-cars-and-vans
Department for Transport. National Travel Survey. Department for Transpor: London, United Kingdom. 2022.
NHS England. Net Zero travel and transport strategy. NHS England: Redditch, United Kingdom. 2023.
Rizan C, Lillywhite R, Reed M, et al. The carbon footprint of products used in five common surgical operations: identifying contributing products and processes. J R Soc Med. 2023; 116: 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/01410768231166135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01410768231166135
Eckelman M, Mosher M, Gonzalez A, et al. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways. Anesth Analg. 2012; 114: 1067–1072. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824f6959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824f6959
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Benjamin Clay, Sandip Hindocha, Kavish Maheshwari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica Society owns the copyright for all material published until Volume 57 (2023) unless otherwise specified. As from 2024 all published articles, unless otherwise specified, are published under CC-BY licences, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, with the condition of proper attribution to the original work.
