Facial nerve recovery trajectories and predictors after vestibular schwannoma surgery: a single-centre cohort study of 213 patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v61.45989Keywords:
Vestibular schwannoma, facial nerve, facial palsy, Koos grade, retrosigmoid, translabyrinthe, surgical outcomesAbstract
Background: After tumour control, facial nerve preservation is a primary objective in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Predicting long-term recovery remains challenging, and the prognostic value of the Koos grade is unclear.
Objective: The primary outcome was facial palsy at 12 months (partial or severe). Secondary outcomes included Day 1 function, recovery trajectory, intraoperative signal status, Koos grade, complications and difference in surgical approaches.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (2006–2024). Two reviewers independently extracted clinical data and assigned blinded Koos grades. Predictors were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.
Results: Of 293 surgically treated patients, 213 with complete follow-up formed the study cohort (retrosigmoid 121, translabyrinthine 92). Sixty-four (30.0%) had any palsy at 12 months: 50 (23.5%) partial and 14 (6.6%) severe. Day 1 facial function dominated all models: severe palsy at Day 1 carried an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 222.08 (95% CI 26.45–1864.44; Firth-corrected OR 128, 21–762), while partial function had an OR of 8.83 (3.93–19.83). Female sex was independently associated with palsy (OR 2.87, p = 0.013); surgical approach was not (OR 0.77, p = 0.550). Koos grade showed no association (OR 1.19, p = 0.730). Among patients with normal Day 1 function, 90% remained palsy free at 1 year; among those with severe palsy, only 4.5% recovered.
Conclusions: A single bedside examination on post-operative Day 1 predicts long-term facial nerve outcome more powerfully than any variable tested, including Koos grade; comparison of surgical approaches remained inconclusive owing to era confounding. Three recovery trajectories provide a framework for tailored post-operative management.
Downloads
References
Goldbrunner R, Weller M, Regis J, et al. EANO guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22(1):31–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz153
Cioffi G, Yeboa DN, Kelly M, et al. Epidemiology of vestibular schwannoma in the United States, 2004–2016. Neuro Oncol Adv. 2020;2(1):vdaa135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa135
Marinelli JP, Lohse CM, Carlson ML. Incidence of vestibular schwannoma over the past half-century: a population-based study of Olmsted County, Minnesota. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;159(4):717–723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599818770629
Stangerup SE, Tos M, Caye-Thomasen P, et al. Increasing annual incidence of vestibular schwannoma and age at diagnosis. J Laryngol Otol. 2004;118(8):622–627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/0022215041917989
Link MJ, Driscoll CL, Neff BA, et al. A 25-year update on the facial nerve sparing approach for vestibular schwannoma. World Neurosurg. 2025;195:e123603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123603
Starnoni D, Daniel RT, Tuleasca C, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the technique of subtotal resection and stereotactic radiosurgery for large vestibular schwannomas: a ‘nerve-centred’ approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;44(3):E4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.12.FOCUS17669
Garcia-Torrico F, Mendieta CD, De Nigris Vasconcellos F, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness and complications of the retrosigmoid, translabyrinthine and middle fossa approaches in vestibular schwannoma surgical management: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 6,889 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2025;48:229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03237-2
Ansari SF, Terry C, Cohen-Gadol AA. Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(3):E14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.6.FOCUS12163
Gibbon FL, Lindner RJ, Vial ADM, et al. Translabyrinthine versus retrosigmoid approach for vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and an updated meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025;172(3):774–786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1031
Pruijn IMJ, van Heemskerken P, Kunst HPM, et al. Patient-preferred outcomes in patients with vestibular schwannoma: a qualitative content analysis of symptoms, side effects and their impact on health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2023;32(10):2887–2897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03433-x
Cross T, Sheard CE, Garsten M, et al. Functional outcomes and self-reported quality of life in patients with facial nerve impairment following vestibular schwannoma surgery. Diagnostics. 2024;14(21):2387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212387
Jain Y, Jumah F, Chaudhry S, et al. Total facial paralysis after vestibular schwannoma surgery: probability of regaining normal function. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004;113(9):706–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940411300906
Bartek J, Jr, Forander P, Thurin E, et al. Short-term surgical outcome for vestibular schwannoma in Sweden: a nation-wide registry study. Front Neurol. 2019;10:43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00043
Yawn RJ, Dedmon MM, Xie D, et al. Delayed facial nerve paralysis after vestibular schwannoma resection. J Neurol Surg B. 2019;80:283–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669941
Zhang X, Wen H, Chen G, et al. Incidence and risk factors of delayed facial paralysis after vestibular schwannoma resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2025;197:123938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123938
Khan AJ, Szczepura A, Palmer S, et al. Physical therapy for facial nerve paralysis (Bell’s palsy): an updated and extended systematic review of the evidence for facial exercise therapy. Clin Rehabil. 2022;36(11):1424–1449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155221110727
Hohman MH, Hadlock TA. Etiology, diagnosis, and management of facial palsy: 2000 patients at a facial nerve center. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(7):E283–E293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24542
Koos WT, Day JD, Matula C, et al. Neurotopographic considerations in the microsurgical treatment of small acoustic neurinomas. J Neurosurg. 1998;88(3):506–512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.3.0506
Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika. 1993;80(1):27–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/80.1.27
Heinze G, Schemper M. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat Med. 2002;21(16):2409–2419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1047
Hostettler IC, Jayashankar N, Bikis C, et al. Clinical studies and pre-clinical animal models on facial nerve preservation, reconstruction, and regeneration following cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery – a systematic review and future perspectives. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:659413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.659413
Huang X, Chen J, Xu J, et al. Factors influencing the outcome of facial nerve function after surgery for large acoustic neuromas. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18(3):409–413.
Ren Y, MacDonald BV, Tawfik KO, et al. Clinical predictors of facial nerve outcomes after surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;164(5):1085–1093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820961389
Sharples L, Papachristofi O, Rex S, et al. Exploring mechanisms of action in clinical trials of complex surgical interventions using mediation analysis. Clin Trials. 2020;17(6):701–712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774520947644
Troude L, Boucekine M, Montava M, et al. Predictive factors of early postoperative and long-term facial nerve function after large vestibular schwannoma surgery. World Neurosurg. 2019;127:e599–e608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.218
Xu F, Pan S, Alsulami FM, et al. Development of a nomogram integrating preoperative and intraoperative variables for predicting facial nerve outcomes in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Front Neurol. 2021;12:817071.
Díaz-Aristizabal U, Valdés-Vilches LF, Chaverri-Fierro D, et al. Correlations between impairment, psychological distress, disability, and quality of life in peripheral facial palsy. Neurologia (Engl Ed). 2019;34(7):423–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrleng.2019.03.001
Fu W, Liang J, Li M, et al. Effect of modified facial paralysis rehabilitation nursing on patients with facial paralysis after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Heliyon. 2024;10:e35060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35060
Patel AJ, Vivas EX, Carlson ML, et al. Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on intraoperative cranial nerve monitoring in vestibular schwannoma surgery: 2025 update. Neurosurgery. 2025;96(Suppl 1):S1–S8.
Machetanz K, Wang SS, Naros G, et al. Sex-specific difference in treatment success/failure after vestibular schwannoma treatment. Neuro Oncol Adv. 2025;7(1):vdaf025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaf025
Hatch JL, Bauschard MJ, Nguyen SA, et al. National trends in vestibular schwannoma surgery: influence of patient characteristics on outcomes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;159(1): 102–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599818765717
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lina Nord, Tobias Hallén, Linus Köster, Anna-Lena Roos, Lena Kollén, Madiha Bhatti-Søfteland
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica Society owns the copyright for all material published until Volume 57 (2023) unless otherwise specified. As from 2024 all published articles, unless otherwise specified, are published under CC-BY licences, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, with the condition of proper attribution to the original work.
