LMWH prophylaxis after digital replantation and early vascular compromise

Authors

  • Xiaoyu Li Department of Hand Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Ting Liu Department of Hand Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Feng Gu Department of Hand Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
  • En Wu Department of Hand Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Yun Cao Department of Hand Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Jishuang Guan Department of Hand Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Jiaxing Fan Department of Hand Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Qiang Wang Department of Hand Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Yonghui Liang Department of Hand Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v61.46664

Keywords:

digital replantation, low-molecular-weight heparin, microvascular thrombosis, vascular crisis, venous congestion

Abstract

Background: Early vascular compromise remains a major cause of failure after digital replantation, and the optimal low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) regimen remains unclear. This study compared intensified versus standard LMWH prophylaxis for preventing early vascular compromise after digital replantation.

Materials and methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, consecutive adult patients undergoing digital replantation (2023–2025) were included. All procedures were performed by one microsurgeon. Postoperative LMWH was administered subcutaneously for 7 days as either 5000 international units once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID), according to a preexisting department protocol. The primary endpoint was a composite of early vascular compromise, including vascular crisis, re-exploration, therapeutic bloodletting/leech therapy, or digit failure.

Results: Sixty-nine patients (85 digits) were included (QD: 39 patients; BID: 30 patients). The primary endpoint occurred in 12/39 patients in the QD group versus 1/30 in the BID group. All vascular crises were venous. Digit failure occurred in 5 QD patients, and none in the BID group. No bleeding or transfusion events were observed.

Conclusions: Twice-daily LMWH prophylaxis was associated with fewer early vascular compromise events after digital replantation compared with once-daily dosing. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require prospective validation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sears ED, Chung KC. Replantation of finger avulsion injuries: a systematic review of survival and functional outcomes. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(4):686–694.

Chang MK, Lim JX, Sebastin SJ. Current trends in digital replantation – a narrative review. Ann Transl Med. 2024;12(4):66.

Efanov JI, Rizis D, Landes G, et al. Impact of the number of veins repaired in short-term digital replantation survival rate. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(5):640–645.

Milone MT, Klifto CS, Lee ZH, et al. Relationships between vein repairs, postoperative transfusions, and survival in single digit replantation. Hand (N Y). 2020;15(4):488–494.

Lee BI, Chung HY, Kim WK, et al. The effects of the number and ratio of repaired arteries and veins on the survival rate in digital replantation. Ann Plast Surg. 2000;44(3):288–294.

Reissis D, Geoghegan L, Sarsam R, et al. Perioperative thromboprophylaxis in digital replantation: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8(5):e2806.

Ono S, Chung KC. Efficiency in digital and hand replantation. Clin Plast Surg. 2019;46(3):359–370.

Lin PT, Wang SH, Chi CC. Low molecular weight heparin for prevention of microvascular occlusion in digital replantation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;4(4):CD009894.

Deblois S, Zhu L, Mastropasqua B, et al. The clinical effectiveness and safety of intravenous unfractionated heparin following digital replantation and revascularization: a narrative systematic review. Microsurgery. 2022;42(6):622–630.

Zhu LM, Baradaran A, Thibaudeau S, et al. The role of intravenous heparin following digital replantation: a retrospective cohort study on 1,155 digits. J Hand Surg Am. 2023;48(3):263–272.

Pickrell BB, Daly MC, Freniere B, et al. Leech therapy following digital replantation and revascularization. J Hand Surg Am. 2020;45(7):638–643.

Arami A, Gurevitz S, Palti R, et al. The use of medicinal leeches for the treatment of venous congestion in replanted or revascularized digits. J Hand Surg Am. 2018;43(10):949.e1–949.e5.

Cigna E, Lo Torto F, Maruccia M, et al. Postoperative care in finger replantation: our case-load and review of the literature. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(14):2552–2561.

Stirrat CR, Seaber AV, Urbaniak JR, et al. Temperature monitoring in digital replantation. J Hand Surg Am. 1978;3(4):342–347.

Schiltz D, Geis S, Kehrer A, et al. Video tutorial for clinical flap-monitoring in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(10):e1478.

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573–577.

Lee JY, Kim HS, Heo ST, et al. Controlled continuous systemic heparinization increases success rate of artery-only anastomosis replantation in single distal digit amputation: a retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(26):e3979.

Nishijima A, Yamamoto N, Gosho M, et al. Appropriate use of intravenous unfractionated heparin after digital replantation: a randomized controlled trial involving three groups. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(6):1224e–1232e.

Maeda M, Fukui A, Tamai S, et al. Continuous local intra-arterial infusion of antithrombotic agents for replantation (comparison with intravenous infusion). Br J Plast Surg. 1991;44(7):520–525.

Nikolis A, Tahiri Y, St-Supery V, et al. Intravenous heparin use in digital replantation and revascularization: the Quebec Provincial Replantation program experience. Microsurgery. 2011;31(6):421–427.

Retrouvey H, Solaja O, Baltzer HL. Role of postoperative anticoagulation in predicting digit replantation and revascularization failure: a propensity-matched cohort study. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;83(5):542–547.

Buntic RF, Brooks D. Standardized protocol for artery-only fingertip replantation. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(9):1491–1496.

Additional Files

Published

2026-08-20

How to Cite

Li, X., Liu, T., Gu, F., Wu, E., Cao, Y., Guan, J., … Liang, Y. (2026). LMWH prophylaxis after digital replantation and early vascular compromise. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, 61(1), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v61.46664

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles