Clinical outcomes of a defect-adapted strategy for free fibular great toe flaps in finger reconstruction: a retrospective series of 35 cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v61.46668Keywords:
Great toe fibular flap, plantar proper artery, dorsal toe artery, dual-system, soft tissue defect, microsurgeryAbstract
Background: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of a personalized surgical strategy for small-to-medium finger defects, utilizing either free dorsal toe or plantar proper digital artery flaps.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 35 patients with finger defects (March 2021–January 2025). Patients were assigned by defect characteristics to Group A (pulp defects, n = 21; plantar proper digital artery flap) or Group B (dorsal/lateral defects, n = 14; modified dorsal toe artery flap preserving the plantar proper neurovascular bundle). We evaluated operative time, flap survival, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), static two-point discrimination (s2PD), and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores.
Results: All 35 flaps survived. Group B had a significantly shorter mean operative time than Group A (124.00 ± 6.42 vs. 146.57 ± 9.61 minutes, p < 0.001). At final follow-up (6–13 months), Group B exhibited slightly better hand function (DASH: 5.89 ± 0.52 vs. 7.17 ± 1.00, p < 0.001; MHQ: 86.89 ± 2.82 vs. 83.61 ± 4.39, p = 0.018). Conversely, Group A achieved superior sensory recovery (s2PD: 7.48 ± 0.93 vs. 8.71 ± 0.83 mm, p < 0.001). Group B showed superior donor-site preservation without painful calluses (AOFAS: 96.08 ± 1.44 vs. 84.31 ± 2.19, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: A tailored approach to donor vessel selection reliably guides personalized finger reconstruction. The plantar proper system optimizes pulp reconstruction for superior sensory recovery, whereas the modified dorsal system suits dorsal/lateral defects by minimizing operative time and maximizing donor-site protection.
Downloads
References
Lin CH, Lin YT, Sassu P,et al. Functional assessment of the reconstructed fingertips after free toe pulp transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Oct;120(5):1315-1321.
Evin N, Evin SG, Guneren E. Composite classification and algorithmic reconstruction of fingertip defects with free lateral great toe flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 May;80:133-144. Epub 2023 Feb 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.02.010
Wang J, Xue M, Lu H ,et al. Functional and aesthetic recovery of the second toe defect using a wrap-around pedicled flap from the great toe. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2023 Oct;48(9):926-929. Epub 2023 Jun 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934231181329
Agnihotri I, Nayak BB, Lakhotia P,et al. Comparative Study of Degree of Great Toe Movement after Complete and Partial Flexor Hallucis Longus Harvest in Free Fibula Flap. Indian J Plast Surg. 2024 May 30;57(3):192-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1786989
Zavala A, Ore JF, Broggi A,et al. Pediatric Mandibular Reconstruction Using the Vascularized Fibula Free Flap: Functional Outcomes in 34 Consecutive Patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Dec 1;87(6):662-668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002963
Sosin M, Lin CH, Steinberg J,et al. Functional Donor Site Morbidity After Vascularized Toe Transfer Procedures: A Review of the Literature and Biomechanical Consideration for Surgical Site Selection. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;76(6):735-42.
Tang SFT, Tang ACW, Chen CK,et al. Foot Plantar Pressure Profile Alteration after Microsurgical Great Toe-to-thumb Transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Sep 1;11(9):e5228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005228
Lin PY, Sebastin SJ, Ono S,et al. A systematic review of outcomes of toe-to-thumb transfers for isolated traumatic thumb amputation. Hand (N Y). 2011 Sep;6(3):235-43. Epub 2011 May 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-011-9340-x
Gu YD, Wu MM, Zheng YL,et al. Vascular variations and their treatment in toe transplantation. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1985 Jan;1(3):227-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1007079
Strauch B, Yu HL. Atlas of Microvascular Surgery: Anatomy and Operative Techniques. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2006.
Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jun;29(6):602-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6%3C602::AID-AJIM4%3E3.0.CO;2-L Erratum in: Am J Ind Med 1996 Sep;30(3):372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L
Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR,et al. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 1998 Jul;23(4):575-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80042-7
Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS,et al. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Jul;15(7):349-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079401500701
Rosén B, Lundborg G. A model instrument for the documentation of outcome after nerve repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2000 May;25(3):535-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2000.6458
Sosin M, Lin CH, Steinberg J,et al. Functional Donor Site Morbidity After Vascularized Toe Transfer Procedures: A Review of the Literature and Biomechanical Consideration for Surgical Site Selection. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;76(6):735-42.
Kwon HJ, Yoon S, Han HH,et al. Partial second-toe pulp free flap for fingertip reconstruction: Experience and surgical tips to minimize complications. Microsurgery. 2021 Oct;41(7):629-636. Epub 2021 Sep 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30804
Lin CH, Lin YT, Sassu P,et al. Functional assessment of the reconstructed fingertips after free toe pulp transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Oct;120(5):1315-1321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000279476.29055.5f
Unglaub F, Langer MF, Unglaub JM,et al. Defektdeckung an den Fingern und am Daumen : Indikation und Therapie [Defect coverage of fingers and thumb : Indications and treatment]. Unfallchirurg. 2018 Apr;121(4):321-334. German. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-018-0469-8
Bott SM, Rachunek K, Medved F,et al. Functional outcome after digit replantation versus amputation. J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Jul 27;23(1):35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00654-7
Mahmoud M, Mohsen I. Revision Surgery for Scar Contracture and Web Creep after Syndactyly Release. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2024 Dec;29(6):594-600. Epub 2024 Nov 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524970026
Sosin M, Lin CH, Steinberg J,et al. Functional Donor Site Morbidity After Vascularized Toe Transfer Procedures: A Review of the Literature and Biomechanical Consideration for Surgical Site Selection. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;76(6):735-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000591
do Amaral SA, de Carvalho BLF, Andrade AC,et al. DORSALIS PEDIS NEUROVASCULAR FLAP, OUR EXPERIENCE. Acta Ortop Bras. 2023 Sep 8;31(spe3):e267572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233103e267572
Li J, Luo X, Zou Y. Reconstruction of the Palmar Defect of the Hand with a Sensory Medial Plantar Artery Flap. Front Surg. 2022 May 6;9:874629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.874629
Hallock GG. The First Dorsal Metatarsal Artery Perforator Propeller Flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;76(6):684-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000264
Saboye M, Majchrzak A, d’Andréa G,et al. The First Dorsal Metatarsal Artery Perforator Flap: A Description and Anatomical Study. J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 11;14(12):4136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124136
Wu Y, Chen B, Dong Z,et al. Repair of distal phalanx finger wound with modified great toe fibular flap with distal artery pedicle as reflux vein. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 15;35(2):206-209. Chinese.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yangyang Liu, Huajian Zhou, Haoran Jiang, Jun Zhu, Renjie Li, Mingyu Jia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica Society owns the copyright for all material published until Volume 57 (2023) unless otherwise specified. As from 2024 all published articles, unless otherwise specified, are published under CC-BY licences, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, with the condition of proper attribution to the original work.

