Modified non-transarticular K-wire external fixation versus traditional transarticular pinning for bony mallet finger: a prospective comparative cohort study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v61.46985Keywords:
Bony mallet finger, K-wire fixation, distal interphalangeal joint, external fixation, postoperative complicationsAbstract
Background: Traditional transarticular distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) pinning for bony mallet fingers risks stiffness and iatrogenic cartilage injury. This study compared a modified non-transarticular K-wire external fixator with traditional transarticular pinning for surgically treated bony mallet finger.
Methods: This single-center prospective nonrandomized comparative cohort study included 120 adults with acute bony mallet finger. Sixty patients underwent traditional transarticular DIPJ pinning, and 60 underwent modified non-transarticular K-wire external fixation. The primary outcome was overall postoperative complications, including pin tract infection, joint stiffness, loss of reduction, nail deformity, or radiographic degenerative change assessed at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included operative time, hardware removal time, bone union time, DIPJ motion, Crawford grade, pain, QuickDASH score, and return-to-work time. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of overall complications.
Results: Baseline demographic and injury characteristics were comparable between groups. Overall complications were significantly less frequent after modified fixation than after traditional fixation (15.0% vs 48.3%, p < 0.001). The modified technique markedly reduced joint stiffness and nail deformity. It was also associated with shorter operative time, earlier hardware removal, faster bone union, lower extension lag, greater maximum DIPJ flexion, better Crawford grade distribution, lower pain and QuickDASH scores, and earlier return to work. In multivariable analysis, traditional fixation remained independently associated with higher complication risk.
Conclusion: Modified non-transarticular K-wire external fixation was associated with fewer complications and better early functional recovery than traditional transarticular DIPJ pinning. This joint-sparing, low-cost technique may be a useful surgical option for selected patients with bony mallet finger.
Downloads
References
Khera B, Chang C, Bhat W. An overview of mallet finger injuries. Acta Bio Med. 2021;92(5):e2021246.
Sivakumar BS, Graham DJ, Ledgard JP, et al. Acute mallet finger injuries – a review. J Hand Surg. 2023;48(3):283–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.10.013
Giddins G. Mallet finger: two different injuries. Hand Clinics. 2022;38(3):281–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2022.02.005
Krastman P, De Schepper E, Bindels P, et al. Incidence and management of mallet finger in Dutch primary care: a cohort study. BJGP Open. 2024;8(1):BJGPO.2023.0040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0040
Childress MA, Olivas J, Crutchfield A. Common finger fractures and dislocations. Am Fam Phys. 2022;105(6):631–639.
Hilgefort J, Becker J, Chu J. Fingertip injuries. Am Fam Phys. 2025;112(1):47–54.
Peng C, Huang RW, Chen SH, et al. Comparative outcomes between surgical treatment and orthosis splint for mallet finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plastic Surg Hand Surg. 2023;57(1–6):54–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2022.2164291
Acar E. The use of stack splint or aluminum finger splint in the conservative management of acute doyle type IVb bony mallet finger. J Orthopaed Sci. 2024;29(4):1091–1096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2023.07.020
Kastenberger T, Kaiser P, Benedikt S, et al. Surgical treatment of the bony mallet thumb: a case series and literature review. Arch Orthopaed Trauma Surg. 2022;142(5):887–900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04333-w
Stumpfe MC, Suffa N, Merkel P, et al. Quick and safe: why a k-wire-extension-block-fixation of a bony mallet finger is the favoured treatment. Arch Orthopaed Trauma Surg. 2024;144(3):1437–1442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05119-y
Shin SH, Cho J, Lee JW, et al. Mini-open reduction and extension block pinning for irreducible mallet fractures: a minimally invasive technique for anatomical reduction. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2021;26(3):425–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835521500429
Zhang Y, Gu Y, Zhou J, et al. Direct fixation of fracture fragment with modified double kirschner wires for the treatment of old bony mallet finger. J Plastic Surg Hand Surg. 2023;58:119–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v58.18306
Suwannaphisit S, Saengsirinavin P, Panichnantho N, et al. The biomechanical properties of the hook plate and pull-out suture in mallet finger fractures: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2024;49(4):430–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934231205550
Acciaro AL, Gravina D, Pantaleoni F, et al. Retrospective study of Ishiguro’s technique for mallet bone finger in children: long-term follow-up and analysis of predictors in outcomes. Int Orthopaed. 2024;48(6):1501–1506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06162-z
Gravina D, Portoghese A, Pantaleoni F, et al. Bony mallet finger: a comparative review of approaches in pediatric vs. adult populations. J Orthoped Orthoped Surg. 2025;6(2):8–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29245/2767-5130/2025/2.1221
Ateş E, Gümüşoğlu E, Arikan A, et al. Assessment of fracture line angle in mallet fractures. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2025;30(1):17–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500018
Gumussuyu G, Asoglu MM, Unal M, et al. Reliability of subluxation and articular involvement measurements during the assessment of bony mallet finger. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2021;40(1):87–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2020.08.008
Lee SH, Kim YS, Kim MB, et al. The concentric circles method to define and assess anterior subluxation in bony mallet finger. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2025;50(11):1516–1522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251348121
Slichter ME, Mathijssen NMC, Yau CCL, et al. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the distal interphalangeal joint: a follow-up study of 12 years after nonsurgical treatment of mallet finger fractures. J Hand Surg. 2023;48(7):691–698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.03.027
Rocchi L, Fulchignoni C, De Vitis R, et al. Extension block pinning vs single kirshner wiring to treat bony mallet finger: a retrospective study. Acta Bio Med. 2022;92(S3):e2021535.
Goto K, Naito K, Nagura N, et al. Outcomes of conservative treatment for bony mallet fingers. Eur J Orthopaed Surg Traumatol. 2021;31(7):1493–1499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02914-4
Seven B, Gökkurt A, Koç M, et al. Investigation of the barriers to and functional outcomes of telerehabilitation in patients with hand injury. J Hand Ther. 2024;37(3):378–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2023.10.003
Galardini L, Coppari A, Pellicciari L, et al. Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) and the shortened version of the DASH (QuickDASH) in people with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2024;104(5):pzae033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae033
Orman O, Baydar M, İpteç M, et al. A new custom-made plate preparation method for bony mallet finger treatment and a comparison with extension block technique. Joint Dis Related Surg. 2021;32(3):617–624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2021.156
Sıvacıoğlu S, Şentürk F, Tellioğlu MB, et al. Extension block kirschner wire fixation for acute bony mallet finger: a retrospective analysis. Ulusal Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025;31(8):804–808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2025.73885
Lucchina S, Meroni M, Molitor M, et al. Finger amputation after pinning of the distal interphalangeal joint for acute closed tendinous mallet finger: a rare but devastating complication. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2022;27(3):590–593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835522720298
Suzuki T, Iwamoto T, Matsumura N, et al. Causes of procedural failures of closed reductions using an extension-block pin for bony mallet finger. J Hand Microsurg. 2021;13(2):69–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701318
Huang Y, Wu K, Shi H, et al. Kirscner wire fixation versus suture anchor technique for mallet finger: a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2021;100(11):e24996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024996
Krastman P, de Schepper EI, Bindels PJ, et al. Incidence of hand and wrist disorders in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. BJGP Open. 2024;8(4):BJGPO.2023.0240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0240
Brush M, Dick NR, Rohman EM, et al. Comparison of orthosis management failure rates for mallet injuries. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2022;4(4):220–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.04.003
Algar L, Backe H, Richer R, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 3-point prefabricated orthosis and elastic tape versus cast immobilization for the nonsurgical management of mallet finger. J Hand Surg. 2023;48(9):951.e1–951.e9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.02.012
Lee SH, Kim MB, Lee YH. Surgical management of delayed mallet finger fractures using combined two-extension block kirschner wire and dorsal counterforce techniques. J Hand Surg. 2026;51(5):555–563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.12.019
Ateş E, Arikan A, Gümüşoğlu E, et al. Could the quality of reduction in mallet fractures be influenced by the angle formed between the extension block pin and the fracture line? J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2026;31(2):196–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835526500220
de Los Angeles Mendoza Velez M, Medina MAR, Lopez RP, et al. Stack splinting versus kirschner wire treatment in acute closed mallet finger doyle I. Plastic Surg. 2022;30(2):117–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503211003838
Abola MV, Amen TB, Athanasian EA. Bony mallet finger malunion: corrective osteotomy technique. Tech Hand Upper Extrem Surg. 2025;29(3):e0528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BTH.0000000000000528
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Weigang Zhu, Jiashi Song, Haibo Zhou, Huaguo Tang, Jingjing Bao, Yuanjie Gu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica Society owns the copyright for all material published until Volume 57 (2023) unless otherwise specified. As from 2024 all published articles, unless otherwise specified, are published under CC-BY licences, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, with the condition of proper attribution to the original work.
