Prospective randomised phase II trial evaluating adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy using either IMRT or 3-Dimensional planning for endometrial cancer

Authors

  • Killian Nugent a St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland; b Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
  • Darragh Browne a St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
  • Mary Dunne a St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
  • Lydia O Sullivan b Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
  • Aoife M. Shannon b Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
  • Deepti Sharma a St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
  • Shirley Bradshaw a St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
  • Orla McArdle a St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland;c Faculty of Radiologists and Radiation Oncologists, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
  • Osama Salib a St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
  • Naomi Lavan a St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
  • Charles Gillham a St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland; b Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2238555

Keywords:

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, endometrial cancer, toxicity, pelvic radiation

Abstract

Objective

To compare the incidence of grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity for patients undergoing 3DRT versus IMRT in the postoperative setting for endometrial cancer.

Methods

Eligible patients were post-operatively randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups in a 1:1 ratio, to have their RT delivered using either a 3DRT technique or using IMRT. The prescription dose was 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks followed by vaginal vault brachytherapy. Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 3.0. Fisher’s exact tests were used to test for associations between toxicity and arm. Differences in dosimetric parameters for patients with or without toxicity were tested using Mann–Whitney U-tests.

Results

84 patients with a median age of 62 were evaluable for primary outcome. The median follow-up was 52 months. 14 (35%) participants from the 3DRT arm and 15 (34%) from the IMRT arm experienced acute grade ≥2 GI toxicity with older patients having a statistically higher risk of grade ≥2 acute GI toxicity. 20 (50%) participants from the 3DRT arm and 25 (57%) from the IMRT arm experienced acute grade ≥2 GI or GU toxicity (p = .662). 12 (30%) patients from the 3DRT arm and 17 (39%) from the IMRT arm experienced acute grade ≥2 GU toxicity (p = .493).

Conclusion

Although IMRT can reduce dose to normal tissue, in this study no benefit in acute GI or GU toxicity outcome was seen.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2023-08-03

How to Cite

Nugent, K., Browne, D., Dunne, M., O Sullivan, L., Shannon, A. M., Sharma, D., … Gillham, C. (2023). Prospective randomised phase II trial evaluating adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy using either IMRT or 3-Dimensional planning for endometrial cancer. Acta Oncologica, 62(8), 907–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2238555