Dose planning study of proton versus photon radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary in the primary and recurrent setting

Authors

  • Anne Ivalu Sander Holm a Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Ulrik Vindelev Elstrøm b Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Signe Bergliot Nielsen c Departments of Head and Neck Surgery & Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Kenneth Jensen b Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2263156

Keywords:

Head and neck cancer, cancer of unknown primary, squamous cell carcinoma, proton therapy

Abstract

Background

Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP) are often treated with extensive radiotherapy (RT). Frequently, the bilateral nodal clinical target volume (nCTV) and the volumes of suspected mucosal primary sites (mCTV) of the pharynx and larynx is irradiated. This treatment is effective but toxic. New data suggest that omission of the contralateral nCTV and mCTV, results in few recurrences. The present study explores photon versus proton therapy, in the primary and recurrent setting.

Material and methods

An analysis of twelve patients previously treated for HNCUP was performed. A fictitious recurrence was defined in patients treated for unilateral disease. Independently a volumetric arc photon plan and an intensity-modulated proton plan was made for all cases and scenarios.

Results

Compared to the standard bilateral treatment this study shows that limiting the target to unilateral nCTV leads to a significant decrease in dysphagia of 18% and 17% and xerostomia of 4.0% and 5% for photon and protons, respectively. Comparing photon RT directly to proton RT shows a small and often insignificant gain, using protons for both bilateral and unilateral targets. Focusing on re-irradiation, benefits from using protons in both the primary setting and at re-irradiation were limited. However, using protons for re-irradiation only leads to a decrease in the tissue volume receiving a specific dose outside the target overlapping region, e.g., V90Gymean was 31, 25, and 22 cm3 for photons-photons, photons-protons, and protons-protons, respectively. For V100Gy of the ipsilateral carotid artery, no differences were observed.

Conclusion

Omitting contralateral nCTV irradiation and mCTV irradiation will significantly reduce toxicity. The accumulated high dose volumes can be minimised using protons for re-irradiation. However, the use of protons for primary treatment provides limited benefit in most patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2023-11-02

How to Cite

Sander Holm, A. I., Vindelev Elstrøm, U., Bergliot Nielsen, S., & Jensen, K. (2023). Dose planning study of proton versus photon radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary in the primary and recurrent setting. Acta Oncologica, 62(11), 1412–1417. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2263156