Interdisciplinary spasticity management clinic outcomes using the Goal Attainment Scale: A retrospective chart review

Authors

  • Amy Hanlan
  • Patricia Mills
  • Rachel Lipson
  • Heather Finlayson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2228

Keywords:

muscle spasticity, botulinum toxin, outcome assessment, patient care team.

Abstract

Objective: To generate practice-based evidence of outcomes in an interdisciplinary spasticity management clinic using practical application of the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). Design: Retrospective chart review. Patients: A total of 225 adult patients who were referred for spasticity management at a tertiary rehabilitation hospital and returned for follow-up between 2010 and 2013. Methods: GAS scores were determined for all patients. GAS T-scores were evaluated based on age; sex; diagnosis; International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) domain; body region affected; and site of botulinum neurotoxin injection. Results: The distribution of GAS outcomes did not vary by age, sex or diagnosis. The overall GAS T-score for the clinic was 47. 7, which is consistent with appropriate goal setting. GAS T-scores did not vary by diagnosis or ICF domain. Significant intervention effects were identified for botulinum neurotoxin, with improvements in GAS T-scores for treatment targeted to both upper and lower limb muscles, compared with no botulinum neurotoxin, across diagnoses and ICF domains. Conclusion: The GAS is a useful patient-centred outcome measure that can be practically applied in the clinical setting for a heterogeneous population with diverse goals. Botulinum neurotoxin treatment in this setting was associated with improved goal attainment relating to multiple ICF domains.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-04

How to Cite

Hanlan, A., Mills, P., Lipson, R., & Finlayson, H. (2017). Interdisciplinary spasticity management clinic outcomes using the Goal Attainment Scale: A retrospective chart review. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 49(5), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2228

Issue

Section

Original Report