Aerobic fitness in adolescents with chronic pain or chronic fatigue: parallels and mechanisms?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2221Keywords:
chronic pain, chronic fatigue, deconditioning, oxygen consumption, work efficiency.Abstract
Objective: Chronic fatigue and chronic pain both deter people from participating in exercise, even though exercise is often a key component of treatment. While reasons for this may seem obvious, the extent and mechanism(s) of reduced exercise performance among affected individuals, particularly those with chronic pain, are not well described. We hypothesized that patients with chronic fatigue are more deconditioned than those with chronic pain, due to the nature of their illness or disability. Design: Retrospective chart audit June 2012 to December 2014. Subjects: Adolescents with chronic fatigue (320, 73 males) or chronic pain (158, 30 males). Methods: Maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test to determine peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2) and work efficiency.Results: Mean (standard deviation (SD)) peakV̇O2 was similar between patients with chronic fatigue and chronic pain: males 36.5 (SD 8.3) vs 34.2 (SD 7.3) ml/kg/min (p=0.17); females 27.3 (SD 6.1) vs 27.6 (SD 6.6) ml/kg/min (p=0.67). PeakV̇O2 was<90% predicted in 80% and 75% of females, or 77% and 83% of males, with chronic fatigue and chronic pain, respectively. Peak O2pulse and work efficiency were likewise similar. Conclusion: Patients in both groups manifest exercise responses typical of cardiopulmonary deconditioning and to similar extent. Failure to detect unique cardiopulmonary or muscle pathophysiology suggests a shared pathway to low aerobic work capacity.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Paolo T. Pianosi, Eric Emerling, Kristin C. Mara, Amy L. Weaver, Philip R. Fischer
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.