Barriers to applying for medical rehabilitation: a time-to-event analysis of employees with severe back pain in Germany
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v53.1408Keywords:
back pain, work disability, rehabilitation, health services accessibility, observational study, time-to-event analysis, rehabilitation access, application barriersAbstract
Objective: Longitudinal studies on barriers to applying for rehabilitation in Germany are lacking in light of the suspected underutilization of rehabilitation services. The aim of this study was to examine application behaviour in persons with disabling back pain and to identify relevant predictors for making an application.
Design: A prospective cohort study with randomized sampling of insurants in the German Pension Insurance, using a questionnaire at baseline and follow-up with linked administrative data for 1.5 years.
Subjects/patients: Employed persons (age range 45–59 years) with a high degree of limitations due to back pain and a self-reported risk of permanent work disability (not applied for disability pension, no medical rehabilitation within the last 4 years).
Methods: Multivariable Cox regression was used to examine the influence of pre-selected variables on making an application in the follow-up period.
Results: Of 690 persons, only 12% applied for rehabilitation. Predictors for making an application were: support from physicians (hazard ratio (HR)=2.24; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.32–3.80), family, and friends (HR=1.67; 95% CI 1.02–2.73), more pain-related disability days (HR=1.02; 95% CI 1.01–1.03), and worse work ability (HR=0.86; 95% CI 0.75–0.97). An intention to apply at baseline mediated the effect of family and physician support on the application.
Conclusion: The low number of applications for rehabilitation despite disabling back pain indicates access barriers to, and underuse of, medical rehabilitation.
Downloads
References
Bevan S. Economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) on work in Europe. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2015; 29: 356-373.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2015.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2015.08.002
Lippe E von der, Krause L, Porst M, Wengler A, Leddin J, Müller A, et al. Prevalence of back and neck pain in Germany. Results from the BURDEN 2020 Burden of Disease Study. J Health Monit 2021; 6 (S3).
Kuntz B, Hoebel J, Fuchs J, Neuhauser H, Lampert T. Soziale Ungleichheit und chronische Rückenschmerzen bei Erwachsenen in Deutschland. Bundesgesundheitsbl 2017; 60: 783-791.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-017-2568-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-017-2568-z
Gesundheit. In: Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), editor. Statistisches Jahrbuch 2019, p. 127-162.
Plass D, Vos T, Hornberg C, Scheidt-Nave C, Zeeb H, Krämer A. Trends in disease burden in Germany: results, implications and limitations of the Global Burden of Disease study. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111: 629-638.
https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2014.0629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2014.0629
Mattila K, Leino M, Kemppi C, Tuominen R. Perceived disadvantages caused by low back pain. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43: 684-688.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0835 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0835
Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für Rehabilitation (BAR e.V.). Trägerübergreifende Ausgabenstatistik der BAR 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.bar-frankfurt.de/service/reha-info-und-newsletter/reha-info-2021/reha-info-012021/traegeruebergreifende-ausgabenstatistik-der-bar.html.
Gerdes N, Zwingmann C, Jäckel W. The system of rehabilitation in Germany. In: Jäckel W, Bengel J, Herdt J, editors. Research in rehabilitation: results from a research network in Southwest Germany. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2006: p. 3-19.
Rehabilitation 2019. In: Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, editor. Statistik der Deutschen Rentenversicherung 219. Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Berlin; 2020.
Rentenzugang 2014. In: Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, editor. Statistik der Deutschen Rentenversicherung 203. Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Berlin; 2015.
Mittag O, Reese C, Meffert C. (Keine) Reha vor Rente: Analyse der Zugänge zur Erwerbsminderungsrente 2005-2009. WSI 2014; 67: 149-155.
https://doi.org/10.5771/0342-300X-2014-2-149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0342-300X-2014-2-149
Märtin S, Zollmann P. Keine Reha vor der Rente? Ergebnisse des Projekts "Sozioökonomische Situation von Personen mit Erwerbsminderung". In: Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, editor. 22. Rehabilitationswissenschaftliches Kolloquium 2013 Mar 4-6; Mainz; 2013, 109-111.
Weyermann M. Medical rehabilitation before the occurrence of early retirement in Germany. Eur J Public Health 2018; 28: 391-392.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky214.239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky214.239
Spanier K, Peters E, Radoschewski FM, Bethge M. Wie kennzeichnen sich Personen mit beantragter und bewilligter medizinischer Rehabilitation? In: Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, editor. 25. Rehabilitationswissenschaftliches Kolloquium 2016 Feb 29-Mar 2; Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Aachen; 2016, 127-128.
Zimmermann M, Glaser-Möller N, Deck R, Raspe H. Subjektive Rehabilitationsbedürftigkeit, Antragsintention und Antragstellung auf medizinische Rehabilitation: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von LVA-Versicherten. Rehabilitation 1999; 38: S122-S127.
Hesse B, Heuer J, Gebauer E. Rehabilitation aus der Sicht kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen: Wissen, Wertschätzung und Kooperationsmöglichkeiten- Ergebnisse des KoRB-Projektes. Rehabilitation 2008; 47: 324-333.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1102951 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1102951
Bethge M, Mattukat K, Fauser D, Mau W. Rehabilitation access and effectiveness for persons with back pain: the protocol of a cohort study (REHAB-BP, DRKS00011554). BMC Public Health 2017; 18: 22.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4588-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4588-x
Schmitt N, Fauser D, Golla A, Zimmer J-M, Bethge M, Mau W. Determinanten des subjektiven Rehabilitationsbedürfnisses und der Antragsintention bei Personen mit Rückenschmerzen. Rehabilitation 2021; 60: 185-194.
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1270-1808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1270-1808
Fauser D, Schmitt N, Golla A, Zimmer J-M, Mau W, Bethge M. Employability and intention to apply for rehabilitation in people with back pain: a cross-sectional cohort study. J Rehabil Med 2020; 52: jrm00125.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2767
Korff M von, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992; 50: 133-149.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4
Mittag O, Raspe H. Eine kurze Skala zur Messung der subjektiven Prognose der Erwerbstätigkeit: Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung an 4279 Mitgliedern der gesetzlichen Arbeiterrentenversicherung zu Reliabilität (Guttman-Skalierung) und Validität der Skala. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 2003; 42: 169-174.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-40095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-40095
Iacobucci D. Mediation analysis and categorical variables: the final frontier. J Consum Psych 2012; 22: 582-594.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.03.006
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 51: 1173-1182.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Mittag O, Meyer T, Glaser-Möller N, Matthis C, Raspe H. Prädiktoren der Reha-Antragstellung in einer Bevölkerungsstichprobe von 4225 Versicherten der Arbeiterrentenversicherung. Praxis Klin Verhaltensmed Rehab 2007; 77: 161-166.
Spanier K, Mohnberg I, Peters E, Michel E, Radoschewski M, Bethge M. Motivationale und volitionale Prozesse im Kontext der Beantragung einer medizinischen Rehabilitationsleistung. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2016; 66: 242-248.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-106288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-106288
Walther AL, Pohontsch NJ, Deck R. Informationsbedarf zur medizinischen Rehabilitation der Deutschen Rentenversicherung: Ergebnisse eines Online-Surveys mit niedergelassenen Ärzten. Gesundheitswesen 2015; 77: 362-367.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1377034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1377034
Richter C, Bethge M, Spanier K, Mau W, Mattukat K. Is strain due to household and family work associated with a subjective need for rehabilitation among employees? A cross-sectional study. ZEFQ 2021; 162: 32-39.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2021.02.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2021.02.007
Zimmer J-M, Fauser D, Golla A, Schmitt N, Bethge M, Mau W. Warum wird kein Rehabilitationsantrag gestellt?: Individuelle Gründe aus der Perspektive von Personen mit Rückenschmerzen und subjektivem Rehabilitationsbedürfnis. In: Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung, editor. 19. Deutscher Kongress für Versorgungsforschung (DKVF) Sep 30-Oct 1 2020; German Medical Science (GMS), Düsseldorf; 2020.
Deck R, Hofreuter-Gätgens K. Soziale Ungleichheit in der medizinischen Rehabilitation. Bundesgesundheitsbl 2016; 59: 245-251.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-015-2284-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-015-2284-5
Schenk L, Bau A-M, Borde T, Butler J, Lampert T, Neuhauser H, et al. Mindestindikatorensatz zur Erfassung des Migrationsstatus Empfehlungen für die epidemiologische Praxis. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 2006; 49: 853-860.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-006-0018-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-006-0018-4
Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Berry JT, Mokdad AH. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disorders 2009; 114: 163-173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026
Streibelt M, Schmidt C, Brünger M, Spyra K. Komorbidität im Patientenurteil - geht das? Validität eines Instruments zur Selbsteinschätzung der Komorbidität (SCQ-D). Orthopäde 2012; 41: 303-310.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-012-1901-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-012-1901-3
Ilmarinen J. The Work Ability Index (WAI). Occup Med-C 2007; 57: 160.
https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqm008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqm008
El Fassi M, Bocquet V, Majery N, Lair ML, Couffignal S, Mairiaux P. Work ability assessment in a worker population: comparison and determinants of Work Ability Index and Work Ability score. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 305.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-305
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Julia-Marie Zimmer, David Fauser, André Golla, Andreas Wienke, Nadine Schmitt, Matthias Bethge, Wilfried Mau
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
