High- and low-intensity exercise do not improve cognitive function after stroke: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors

  • Ada Tang
  • Janice J. Eng
  • Andrei V. Krassioukov
  • Teresa S.M. Tsang
  • Teresa Liu-Ambrose

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2163

Keywords:

stroke, exercise, cognition.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of high versus low-intensity exercise on cognitive function following stroke. DESIGN: Secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial with blinded assessors. SUBJECTS: 50-80 years old, living in the community, > 1 year post-stroke. METHODS: Participants were randomized into a high-intensity Aerobic Exercise or low-intensity non-aerobic Balance/Flexibility program. Both programs were 6 months long, with 3 60-min sessions/week. Verbal item and working memory, selective attention and conflict resolution, set shifting were assessed before and after the program. RESULTS: Forty-seven participants completed the study (22/25 in Aerobic Exercise group, 25/25 in Balance/Flexibility group). There was an improvement in verbal item memory in both groups (time effect p = 0.04), and no between-group differences in improvement in the other outcomes (p > 0.27). There was no association between pre-exercise cognitive function and post-exercise improvement. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to a small body of previous research suggesting positive benefits of exercise on cognition post-stroke, the current study found that 6 months of high or low intensity exercise was not effective in improving cognitive function, specifically executive functions. Further research in this area is warranted to establish the effectiveness of post-stroke exercise programs on cognition, and examine the mechanisms that underlie these changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-10-12

How to Cite

Tang, A., Eng, J. J., Krassioukov, A. V., Tsang, T. S., & Liu-Ambrose, T. (2016). High- and low-intensity exercise do not improve cognitive function after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 48(10), 841–846. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2163

Issue

Section

Original Report