Fatigue during and after cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors

  • Myrna Elena van Geffen
  • Nienke ter Hoeve
  • Madoka Sunamura
  • Henk J. Stam
  • Ron T. van Domburg
  • Rita J.G. van den Berg-Emons

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1967

Keywords:

cardiac rehabilitation, fatigue, severity, depression, aerobic capacity, coronary artery disease.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate fatigue during and after a multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation programme and its association with aerobic capacity. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. PATIENTS: A total of 121 patients with coronary artery disease (79% men), mean age 57 years. METHODS: Fatigue was measured with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and aerobic capacity with the 6-min walk test (6MWT). FSS scores ≥ 4 were defined as fatigue and >5.1 as severe fatigue. Measurements were taken before (T0) and after rehabilitation (T1) and at 1-year follow-up (T2). RESULTS: Fatigue decreased from 3.49 at baseline to 3.03 post-rehabilitation (p=0.002) and decreased further to 2.75 at follow-up (p<0.001 vs T0). At baseline, 17.7% of patients were classified as severely fatigued. After cardiac rehabilitation, the prevalence decreased to 10.6% (p<0.001) and to 8.1% at follow-up (p=0.011 vs T0). Although the prevalence of severely fatigued patients decreased, it was still high compared with healthy individuals (3.5%). Aerobic capacity was weakly associated with a reduction in fatigue (p=0.030). CONCLUSION: Fatigue decreased during and after cardiac rehabilitation. However, the prevalence of severely fatigued patients remained high after cardiac rehabilitation. Fatigue should be identified at an early stage in order to provide additional programmes aiming to reduce severe fatigue.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-04-22

How to Cite

van Geffen, M. E., ter Hoeve, N., Sunamura, M., Stam, H. J., van Domburg, R. T., & van den Berg-Emons, R. J. (2015). Fatigue during and after cardiac rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 47(6), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1967

Issue

Section

Original Report