Shoulder load during synchronous handcycling and handrim wheelchair propulsion in persons with paraplegia

Authors

  • Ursina Arnet
  • Stefan van Drongelen
  • Anke Scheel-Sailer
  • Lucas H.V. van der Woude
  • DirkJan H. Veeger

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0929

Keywords:

Key words: mobility, handbike, wheelchair, biomechanics, muscles, rehabilitation, shoulder, spinal cord injury.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the shoulder load during handcycling and wheelchair propulsion under similar conditions of external power in persons with spinal cord injury. Design: Cross-sectional. Subjects: Eight men with spinal cord injury. Methods: Kinetics and kinematics were measured during handbike and wheelchair propulsion at 25, 35, 45 and 55 W on a treadmill. Shoulder load (glenohumeral contact forces, relative muscle forces) was calculated with the Delft Shoulder and Elbow Model. Results: At all power output levels, glenohumeral contact forces were significantly lower during handcycling compared with wheelchair propulsion (p < 0. 001). At 55 W, the mean glenohumeral contact force was 345 N for hand?cycling, whereas it was 585 N for wheelchair propulsion. Also, relative muscle forces were lower during handcycling. The largest differences between handbike and wheelchair propulsion were found in the supraspinatus (4. 5% vs. 20. 7%), infraspinatus (3. 7% vs. 16. 5%) and biceps (5. 0% vs. 17. 7%). Conclusion: Due to continuous force application in hand?cycling, shoulder load was lower compared with wheelchair propulsion. Furthermore, muscles that are prone to overuse injuries were less stressed during handcycling. Therefore, handcycling may be a good alternative for outdoor mobility and may help prevent overuse injuries of the shoulder complex.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2012-01-17

How to Cite

Arnet, U., van Drongelen, S., Scheel-Sailer, A., van der Woude, L. H., & Veeger, D. H. (2012). Shoulder load during synchronous handcycling and handrim wheelchair propulsion in persons with paraplegia. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(3), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0929

Issue

Section

Original Report