Reliability and validity of a kinematic spine model during active trunk movement in healthy subjects and patients with chronic non-specific low back pain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1015Keywords:
kinematics, low back pain, diagnosis, movement, reliability, validity, spine.Abstract
Objective: To develop a standardized, reliable, valid spine model of active trunk movements that accurately discriminates kinematic patterns of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain from those of healthy subjects. Design: Comparative cohort study. Subjects: Healthy subjects (n = 25) and patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (n = 25) aged 30?65 years. Methods: Subjects performed 7 trunk movements from a seated position at non-imposed speed during 2 sessions. Nine markers on bony landmarks measured range of motion and speed of 5 spinal segments, recorded by 8 optoelectronic cameras. Results: Both groups showed good?excellent reliability in all movements for range of motion and speed of all spinal segments (intraclass correlation (ICC), 0. 70?0. 96; standard error of measurement, expressed as a percentage, 19. 4?3. 3%). The minimal detectable change in the patient group was 16. 7?53. 7%. Range of motion and speed in all spinal segments for trunk flexion, rotation, and flexion with rotation differed significantly between groups (p < 0. 001), with large/very large effect sizes (Cohen?s d = 1. 2?2). Binary logistic regression yielded sensitivities/specificities of 92%/84% for range of motion and 92%/80% for speed. Conclusion: Kinematic variables are valid, reliable measures and can be used clinically to diagnose chronic non-specific low back pain, manage treatment, and as quantitative outcome measures for clinical trial interventions.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.