Quality of life of traumatic spinal cord injured patients in Hong Kong.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0150Keywords:
quality of life, traumatic spinal cord injury, paraplegic, Hong KongAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the health-related quality of life of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury living in Hong Kong. DESIGN: A cross-sectional retrospective study. SUBJECTS: Subjects with paraplegia following traumatic spinal cord injury were recruited from our department, which is one of the 3 main regional spinal cord injury rehabilitation centres in Hong Kong. A total of 120 potential participants were invited to join the study. The final study group comprised 58 patients (25 (43%) men and 33 (57%) women, 30 (50%) of whom were under 40 years of age). METHODS: Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Hong Kong Chinese version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Measure Abbreviated version (WHO-QOL-BREF(HK)). Results were summarized and compared with previous results from healthy and other disease populations in Hong Kong. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in quality of life between men and women, or between different durations of spinal cord injury, different educational levels or different marital status (p > 0.05). However, a significant difference in quality of life was found in different age groups and between people with incomplete and complete paraplegia (p < 0.05). Compared with healthy and other disease populations, people with paraplegia had the lowest quality of life in Hong Kong (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: People with paraplegia in Hong Kong have a lower quality of life than the general Hong Kong population. More community support is required to meet the needs of these patients in the areas of transportation, medical care and social life, in particular.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.