Altered interpretation of neck proprioceptive signals in persons with subclinical recurrent neck pain.

Authors

  • Isabelle Paulus
  • Simon Brumagne

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0189

Keywords:

neck pain, proprioception, reference frame, postural control, shoulder, head.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether subjects with subclinical recurrent neck pain have an altered interpretation of neck proprioceptive signals. DESIGN: A comparative group design. SUBJECTS: Twelve subjects with recurrent neck pain and 12 control subjects. METHODS: The shoulder, head, trunk and whole-body position were measured under the following conditions: active and passive elevation and depression of the right shoulder and vibration of the trapezius muscle. RESULTS: During passive shoulder movements both groups moved their head in the opposite direction (p<0.05). During passive elevation subjects with recurrent neck pain showed a significant over-appraisal of shoulder position. Both groups responded similarly to active movements. Subjects with recurrent neck pain and control subjects showed similar trunk and head-to-trunk movements during shoulder movements. Subjects with recurrent neck pain, however, made larger movements compared with healthy subjects (p<0.05). During trapezius muscle vibration similar whole-body movements were found in both groups. CONCLUSION: These results show a modified interpretation of neck proprioceptive signals in subjects with recurrent neck pain and may reflect an offset in the egocentric reference frame or a decreased capacity to switch between reference frames. Better insight into these mechanisms might lead to better evaluation and treatment of subjects with recurrent neck pain and to a reduction in recurrent episodes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2008-06-05

How to Cite

Paulus, I., & Brumagne, S. (2008). Altered interpretation of neck proprioceptive signals in persons with subclinical recurrent neck pain. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40(6), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0189

Issue

Section

Original Report