Implementation of evidence-based interventions according to the Swedish National Guidelines for Strokecare: a nationwide survey among physiotherapists

Authors

  • Sara Brycke Department of Neurology, Rehabilitation Medicine, Memory Disorders and Geriatrics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • Anna Bråndal Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
  • Christina Brogårdh Department of Neurology, Rehabilitation Medicine, Memory Disorders and Geriatrics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.18444

Keywords:

Rehabilitation, stroke, national guidelines, physiotherapy, implementation

Abstract

Objective: To investigate (i) to what extent physiotherapists (PTs) working in stroke rehabilitation in various parts of the stroke care chain have implemented interventions according to the national guidelines for stroke (NGS), (ii) facilitating and hindering factors for the implementation, and (iii) differences between various care settings.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Subjects: 148 PTs working in stroke rehabilitation in various parts of the care chain in Sweden.

Methods: Data were collected by a web-based survey.

Results: Task-specific training for walking (80–98%), impaired motor function (64–100%) and fall prevention (73–92%) were most implemented. Factors that facilitated implementation were: important to comply with the NGS, that PTs had confidence to perform the interventions, and that interventions were clearly described. Limited time, lack of resources, no clear goals or routines at the workplace hindered the implementation. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between the settings existed. Municipal and primary care reported most challenges in implementing the NGS and providing evidence-based interventions.

Conclusion: Most interventions, with high priority according to NGS, are provided by PTs working in stroke rehabilitation, although differences in various parts of the care chain exist. Knowledge, time, education and supportive management are important factors when implementing evidence-based interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Socialstyrelsen. Nationella riktlinjer för vård vid stroke: stöd för styrning och ledning[Internet]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2020. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/nationella-riktlinjer/2020-1-6545.pdf 2020.

Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2016; 47: e98-e169.

https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000098

Socialstyrelsen. Statistik om stroke 2019 [Internet]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2019. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik-och-data/statistik/alla-statistikamnen/stroke/

Langhorne P, Legg L. Evidence behind stroke rehabilitation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; Suppl 4: iv18-iv21.

https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.74.suppl_4.iv18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.74.suppl_4.iv18

Talbot LR, Viscogliosi C, Desrosiers J, Vincent C, Rousseau J, Robichaud L. Identification of rehabilitation needs after a stroke: an exploratory study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 53.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-53

Turner-Stokes L, Disler PB, Nair A, Wade DT. Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005: Cd004170.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004170.pub2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004170.pub2

Riksstroke. Stroke och TIA: Årsrapport från Riksstroke [Internet]. Umeå: Riksstroke; 2021. Available from: https://www.riksstroke.org/eng/

Palmcrantz S, Tistad M, Eldh AC, Holmqvist LW, Ehrenberg A, Tomson G, et al. Assessing feasibility and acceptability of study procedures: getting ready for implementation of national stroke guidelines in out-patient health care. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15: 517.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1177-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1177-5

Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Qual Health Care 1998; 7: 149-158.

https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.7.3.149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.7.3.149

Helfrich CD, Damschroder LJ, Hagedorn HJ, Daggett GS, Sahay A, Ritchie M, et al. A critical synthesis of literature on the promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS) framework. Implement Sci 2010; 5: 82.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-82 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-82

Harvey G, Kitson A. PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci 2016; 11: 33.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0398-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0398-2

Bird ML, Miller T, Connell LA, Eng JJ. Moving stroke rehabilitation evidence into practice: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 2019; 33: 1586-1595.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519847253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519847253

Mudge S, Hart A, Murugan S, Kersten P. What influences the implementation of the New Zealand stroke guidelines for physiotherapists and occupational therapists? Disabil Rehabil 2017; 39: 511-518.

https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1146361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1146361

Jolliffe L, Hoffmann T, Lannin NA. Increasing the uptake of stroke upper limb guideline recommendations with occupational therapists and physiotherapists: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Aust Occup Ther J 2019; 66: 603-616.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12599 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12599

Donnellan C, Sweetman S, Shelley E. Implementing clinical guidelines in stroke: a qualitative study of perceived facilitators and barriers. Health Policy 2013; 111: 234-244.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.04.002

Ullberg T, Zia E, Petersson J, Norrving B. Perceived unmet rehabilitation needs 1 year after stroke: an observational study from the Swedish Stroke Register. Stroke 2016; 47: 539-541.

https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011670

Kjörk EK, Gunnel C, Lundgren-Nilsson Å, Sunnerhagen KS. Experiences, needs, and preferences for follow-up after stroke perceived by people with stroke and healthcare professionals: a focus group study. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0223338.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223338

Abrahamson V, Wilson PM. How unmet are unmet needs post-stroke? A policy analysis of the six-month review. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19: 480.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4210-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4210-2

Foley N, McClure JA, Meyer M, Salter K, Bureau Y, Teasell R. Inpatient rehabilitation following stroke: amount of therapy received and associations with functional recovery. Disabil Rehabil 2012; 34: 2132-2138.

https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.676145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.676145

Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011; 377: 1693-1702.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5

Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 741-754.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4

Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e87987.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087987

Munce SEP, Graham ID, Salbach NM, Jaglal SB, Richards CL, Eng JJ, et al. Perspectives of health care professionals on the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of a stroke rehabilitation guidelines cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17: 440.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2389-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2389-7

Alt Murphy M, Björkdahl A, Forsberg-Wärleby G, Persson CU. Implementation of evidence-based assessment of upper extremity in stroke rehabilitation: from evidence to clinical practice. J Rehabil Med 2021; 53: jrm00148.

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2790

Juckett LA, Wengerd LR, Faieta J, Griffin CE. Evidence-based practice implementation in stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review of barriers and facilitators. Am J Occup Ther 2020; 74: 7401205050p1-p14.

https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.035485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.035485

Langhorne P, Baylan S. Early supported discharge service for people with acute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 7: Cd000443.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000443.pub4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000443.pub4

Socialstyrelsen. Målnivåer för indikatorer i nationella riktlinjer [Internet]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2019. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/kunskapsstod-och-regler/regler-och-riktlinjer/nationella-riktlinjer/om-malnivaer/

Ullberg T, Zia E, Petersson J, Norrving B. Doctors follow-up after stroke in the south of Sweden: an observational study from the Swedish stroke register (Riksstroke). Eur Stroke J 2016; 1: 114-121.

https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987316650597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987316650597

Tistad M, von Koch L, Sjöstrand C, Tham K, Ytterberg C. What aspects of rehabilitation provision contribute to self-reported met needs for rehabilitation one year after stroke - amount, place, operator or timing? Health Expect 2013; 16: e24-35.

https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12095

Tistad M, Tham K, von Koch L, Ytterberg C. Unfulfilled rehabilitation needs and dissatisfaction with care 12 months after a stroke: an explorative observational study. BMC Neurol 2012; 12: 40.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-12-40 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-12-40

Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EE, Wolf SL. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14: 224-234

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70160-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70160-7

Forsmark A, Rosengren L, Ertzgaard P. Inequalities in pharmacologic treatment of spasticity in Sweden: health economic consequences of closing treatment gap. Health Econ Rev 2020; 10: 4.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-020-0261-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-020-0261-7

Eng JJ, Bird ML, Godecke E, Hoffmann TC, Laurin C, Olaoye OA, et al. Moving stroke rehabilitation research evidence into clinical practice: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke 2019; 14: 766-773.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493019873597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493019873597

Socialstyrelsen. Utvärdering av vård vid stroke [Internet]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2018. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/nationella-riktlinjer/2018-12-59.pdf

Fysioterapeuterna. Specialiststatistik, January 2022. [Internet]. Stockholm: Fysioterapeuterna; 2022. Available from: https://www.fysioterapeuterna.se/utbildningar/specialistordningen/

Rattray J, Jones MC. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. J Clin Nurs 2007;16: 234-243.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x

Published

2024-03-19

How to Cite

Brycke, S., Bråndal, A., & Brogårdh, C. (2024). Implementation of evidence-based interventions according to the Swedish National Guidelines for Strokecare: a nationwide survey among physiotherapists. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 56, jrm18444. https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.18444

Issue

Section

Original Report

Categories