Relationship between gait profile score and clinical assessments of gait in post-stroke patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2809Keywords:
stroke, neurorehabilitation, Gait Profile Score, Gait Variable Score, clinical scaleAbstract
Background: Gait Profile Score (GPS) was validated as quality measure for the Gait Analysis (GA) in several patholgies, but GPS was never compared with clinical scales in post-stroke patients. Objective: The aim of the study was to quantify functional limitation of post-stroke hemiparetic patients using clinical-functional scales and GPS and to assess the presence of correlation between GPS and the clinical-based outcome scales. Methods: Thirty-three patients were assessed with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Ten-Meter Walk Test (10-MWT); GPS was obtained by GA. Results: GPS showed a fair relationship with FAC (p?=?0.017; r?=??0.412), TIS (p?=?0.011, r?=??0.436) and 10-MWT (p?=?0.009, r?=? 0.49) and good correlation with BBS (p?=?0.001; r?=??0.561). The three regression models were statistically significant: Model 1 showed that FAC, GPS and FIM had a statistically significant effect in the determination of the BBS, in model 2 and 3, FIM presented a statistically significant effect on TIS determination. Conclusion: GPS seems to be an independent linear predictor of balance performance in stroke patient, and GVSs on sagittal plane might help clinicians to investigate the acquired compensatory strategies.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Matteo Bigoni, Veronica Cimolin, Luca Vismara, Andrea G. Tarantino, Daniela Clerici, Silvia Baudo, Manuela Galli, Alessandro Mauro

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.