Strategies for learning glossopharyngeal breathing in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A feasibility case series
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2729Keywords:
neuromuscular disease, breathing exercise, insufflation, decision-making, physical therapyAbstract
Objective: To propose alternative learning strategies for glossopharyngeal breathing in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and healthy men. Design: A feasibility study with small case series. Subjects: Five boys with DMD and 7 male physical therapists as healthy controls who had not learned glossopharyngeal breathing. Methods: Participants were instructed in a glossopharyngeal breathing protocol, including induction methods comprising sucking motions and phonation with inhalation. The protocol consisted of 1?6 sessions (10?15 min each; total 60 min). Criteria for glossopharyngeal breathing mastery were vital capacity with glossopharyngeal insufflation (VCGI)/VC ratio >?1.10 for the DMD group and >?1.05 for the Healthy group. Feasibility outcomes were time required for mastering glossopharyngeal breathing, self-reported outcomes, adverse events and drop-outs. Results: All participants learned glossopharyngeal breathing within the allocated 60 min. Mean VCGI/VC ratio was 1.31 for the DMD group and 1.09 for the Healthy group. No adverse events or drop-outs were encountered during the protocol. In most cases, self-reported outcomes showed that motivation increased and difficulty decreased. Conclusion: Induction methods for sucking motions and phonation with inhalation for glossopharyngeal breathing learning are feasible. This paper proposes alternative strategies for glossopharyngeal breathing learning in boys with DMD and their instructors.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Koshiro Haruyama, Yosuke Yamaha, Miyuki Ito, Tomoyoshi Otsuka, Michiyuki Kawakami
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.