The etiology and conservative treatment of humeral epicondylitis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977198315205211Abstract
The etiology of humeral epicondylitis and three different conservative methods of treatment were prospectively studied during two years in patients visiting a large occupational health center. Eighty-eight workers, 50 male and 38 female, out of 7600 suffered from humeral epicondylitis. The annual incidence was 59 per 10 000 workers. The mean age was 43 years. The main cause (61.4%) of tennis elbow was over-exertion of the finger and wrist extensors in trained workers. Forty-seven patients were treated with local corticosteroid and anesthetic injections (beta-methasone + lidocaine), 20 patients with methylprednisolone injections and 21 patients with wrist immobilization in combination with indomethacin. The result of therapy was excellent or good in 82% of the cases after six months and in 90% after one year. No significant differences (p greater than 0.1) in results were observed between patients treated with different therapies. Two patients (2.3%) were operated on after conservative treatment had failed.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.