Stroke rehabilitation: identification of target groups and planning data

Authors

  • Pedro-Cuesta de
  • B Sandström
  • M Holm
  • L Stawiarz
  • L Widén-Holmqvist
  • P. Bach-y-Rita

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/165019771993107116

Abstract

In order to ascertain the need for late stroke rehabilitation in South-West Stockholm (SWS) and explore the conditions for experimental stroke outcome research, we followed a population-based, systematic sample of incident stroke patients, hospitalized during the period 1987-1988, using computer files and a telephone interview. The annual incidence of first-ever or recurrent transitory ischaemic attack (TIA) or acute stroke during the period was 2.83 per 1000. In December 1989, approximately 3% of these incident patients declared subjective residual dysfunction, were living at home and were considered potential candidates for rehabilitation. The estimated prevalence of home-bound individuals with residual dysfunction due to stroke was 0.74 per 1000 (95% CI 0.51-1.04). The average duration of hospitalization for these patients was 95.2 days. Approximately 3/4 of them were interested in further conventional rehabilitation. The group not interested in this therapy were mainly females and were older. They scored lower in personal ADL and mental activity, but similarly in motor function. We concluded that the prevalence need for rehabilitation after stroke in the SWS community amounted to at least 1/1000. Early rehabilitation in the community, linked to post-acute stroke care with reduction of hospital stay would be functionally and socially advantageous and cost-effective for more than 25% of the incident stroke cases. Stroke rehabilitation and clinical follow-up are closely related processes that should be evaluated simultaneously.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1993-09-01

How to Cite

de, P.-C., Sandström, B., Holm, M., Stawiarz, L., Widén-Holmqvist, L., & Bach-y-Rita, P. (1993). Stroke rehabilitation: identification of target groups and planning data. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 25(3), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.2340/165019771993107116

Issue

Section

Original Report