The comprehensive 360° model of research: its foundations and exemplary application in spinal cord injury
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.42019Keywords:
health status indicators, functioning, interdisciplinary research, patient-centred care, rehabilitation, spinal cord injuries, health policy, health systemsAbstract
Objective: This paper introduces the “360° Model of Research”, a novel framework designed to prioritize functioning as a primary health indicator, particularly for individuals living with health conditions. The goal is to promote this model as a comprehensive, person-centred, and interdisciplinary approach to health research, moving beyond the traditional siloed and disease-based methodologies.
Methods: The paper is conceptual, integrating existing scientific literature and theoretical frameworks to build the 360° Model. It draws on interdisciplinary perspectives from rehabilitation, social sciences, health services research, and ethics, among others, to create a unified health science focused on optimizing functioning.
Results: The 360° Model emphasizes functioning as a key health indicator, combining biological health with lived experience. The Model provides a reference framework for data collection, but does not presume any particular explanatory theory about how lived experience is created or interpreted by the individual. It has been successfully applied in the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI), demonstrating its value in addressing the comprehensive needs of individuals with spinal cord injury through interdisciplinary collaboration and a learning health system theory.
Conclusion: The 360° Model offers a transformative approach, highlighting the importance of functioning in health research. It provides a robust foundation for a new interdisciplinary field of Human Functioning Sciences, aimed at optimizing health and well-being across diverse populations.
Downloads
References
United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. Leaving no one behind in an ageing world. New York: United Nations; 2023 [cited 2024 Sep 2]. Available from: https://desapublications.un.org/file/1087/download.
World Health Organization. World report on ageing and health. Geneva: WHO; 2015.
World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases. Fact sheet: 16 September 2023 [cited 2024 Sep 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases.
Chatterji S, Byles J, Cutler D, Seeman T, Verdes E. Health, functioning and disability in older adults: present status and future im-plications. Lancet 2015; 385: 563–575.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61462-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61462-8
GBD 2017 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 359 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392: 1859–1922.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32335-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32335-3
GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020; 396: 1204–1222.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9
Shu J, Jin W. Prioritizing non-communicable diseases in the post-pandemic era based on a comprehensive analysis of the GBD 2019 from 1990 to 2019. Sci Rep 2023; 13:13325.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40595-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40595-7
United Nations. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. GA res. 2200A (XXI) 16 December 1966 [cited 2024 Sep 2]. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights.
Bickenbach J, Rubinelli S, Baffone C, Stucki, G. The human functioning revolution: implications for health systems and sciences. Front Rehabil Sci 2023; 4: 1111234.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsci.2023.1118512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsci.2023.1118512
World Health Organization. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2001 [cited 2024 Sep 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health.
World Health Organization. Closing the gap in a generation. Final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Ge-neva: WHO; 2008.
Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Health, functioning, and well-being: individual and societal. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2019; 100: 1788–1792.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.03.004
Stucki G, Bickenbach J, Selb M, Melvin J. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. In: Frontera W, edi-tor. DeLisa’s Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: Principles and Practice. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2016, p. 208–226.
Cieza A, Sabariego C, Bickenbach J, Chatterji S. Rethinking disability. BMC Med 2018; 16: 14.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-1002-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-1002-6
Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, and justice through occupation. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2007.
Jarl G, Lundqvist LO. An alternative perspective on assistive technology: the person-environment-tool (PET) model. Assist Technol 2020; 32: 47–53.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2018.1467514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2018.1467514
Scherer M, Craddock G. Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process. Technol Disabil 2002; 14: 125–131.
https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-2002-14308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-2002-14308
Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Epidemiology of disability. Chapter 1.2: The scope of physical and rehabilitation medicine. J Int Soc Phys Rehabil Med 2019; 2–14.
Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Functioning – the third health indicator in the health system and the key indicator for rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 53: 134–138.
https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04565-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04565-8
Bickenbach J, Rubinelli S, Sabariego C, Stucki G. The learning rehabilitation system: strengthening an intersectoral strategy to improve functioning of an ageing population. Health Policy 2023; 135: 104866.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104866
Stucki G, Rubinelli S, Reinhardt JD, Bickenbach JE. Towards a common understanding of the health sciences. Gesundheitswesen 2016; 78: e80–e84.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108442 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108442
Bickenbach J, Danermark B. Interdisciplinarity and rehabilitation research. In: Harsløf I, Poulsen I, Larsen K, editors. New dynamics of disability and rehabilitation. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019, p. 293–312.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7346-6_13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7346-6_13
National Academy of Medicine. Aging, functioning, and rehabilitation: proceedings of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Acade-mies Press; 2024 [cited 2024 Sep 6]. Available from: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/aging-functioning-rehabilitation
Prodinger B, Ballert CS, Cieza A, SwiSCI Study Group. Setting up a cohort study of functioning: from classification to measurement. J Rehabil Med 2016; 48: 131–140.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2030
Cieza A, Boldt C, Ballert CS, Eriks-Hoogland I, Bickenbach JE, Stucki G. Setting up a cohort study on functioning: deciding what to measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 90: S17–28.
https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e318230fddb DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e318230fddb
Cieza A, Kirchberger I, Biering-Sørensen F, Baumberger M, Charlifue S, Post MW, et al. ICF Core Sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the long-term context. Spinal Cord 2010; 48: 305–312.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.183
Kirchberger I, Cieza A, Biering-Sørensen F, Baumberger M, Charlifue S, Post MW, et al. ICF Core Sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the early post-acute context. Spinal Cord 2010; 48: 297–304.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.128
Eriks-Hoogland IE, Brinkhof MW, Al-Khodairy A, Baumberger M, Brechbühl J, Curt A, et al. Measuring body structures and body functions from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health perspective: considerations for biomedical parameters in spinal cord injury research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 90: S50–65.
https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e318230fb3b DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e318230fb3b
Prodinger B, Cieza A, Oberhauser C, Bickenbach J, Üstün TB, Chatterji S, et al. Toward the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) rehabilitation set: a minimal generic set of domains for rehabilitation as a health strategy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97: 875–884.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.030
Prodinger B, Ballert CS, Cieza A; SwiSCI Study Group. Setting up a cohort study of functioning: from classification to measurement. J Rehabil Med 2016; 48: 131–140.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2030
Escorpizo R, Graf S, Marti A, Noreau L, Post MW, Stucki G, et al. Domain sets and measurement instruments on participation and environmental factors in spinal cord injury research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 90: S66–78.
https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e318230fbf9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e318230fbf9
Stucki G, Bickenbach J. The Implementation Challenge and the Learning Health System for SCI Initiative. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 96: S55–S60.
https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000672
Biering-Sørensen F, Bickenbach JE, El Masry WS, Officer A, von Groote PM. ISCoS-WHO collaboration. International perspectives of spinal cord injury (IPSCI) report. Spinal Cord 2011; 49: 679–683.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.12
Bickenbach J, Officer A, Shakespeare T, von Groote P, editors. International perspectives on spinal cord injury. Geneva: WHO; 2013 [cited 2024 Sep 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/international-perspectives-on-spinal-cord-injury.
World Health Organization. Landmark resolution on strengthening rehabilitation in health systems. Geneva: WHO; 2023 [cited 2024 Sep 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/27-05-2023-landmark-resolution-on-strengthening-rehabilitation-in-health-systems.
United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. GA res. 61/106. 12 December 2006 [cited 2024 Sep 2]. Avai-lable from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities.
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sara Rubinelli, Jerome Bickenbach, James W. Middleton, Ian D. Cameron, Carla Sabariego, Gerold Stucki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
