Why we need a representative organization of academic PRM in Europe, and why we need it now

Authors

  • Gerold Stucki Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland; Center for Rehabilitation in Global Health Systems, WHO Collaborating Center, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland; Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland
  • Henk J. Stam Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0451-0705
  • Francesca Gimigliano Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1905-6405
  • Stefano Negrini Department of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Sciences, University of Milan "La Statale", Milan, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1878-2747

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.42369

Keywords:

medical education, academic medical centers, medical faculty, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Professional Competence, Rehabilitation

Abstract

The growing relevance of rehabilitation in healthcare to address increasing patient needs necessitates robust Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) integration into medical education and practice. Academic PRM, rooted in medical faculties, is vital for developing the medical speciality as an academic discipline across Europe, where it faces challenges, including limited representation in medical schools and competition for resources with established disciplines. This commentary advocates establishing a representative organization for academic PRM in Europe.

Currently, no organization adequately represents academic PRM at the European level. The lack of academic chairs and departments in some countries undermines PRM’s credibility and visibility, making it less attractive to students and prospective academics. An organized effort could provide a platform for knowledge exchange, policy formulation, and advocacy, ultimately strengthening the discipline’s presence in medical faculties.

Immediate action is crucial, particularly in light of the WHO’s call for action 2030 and its 2023 resolution emphasizing the need for rehabilitation within health systems. A representative European academic PRM organization could advocate for education on rehabilitation across all medical specialities and enhance the understanding of functioning as a health indicator. It would also support the development of national academic organizations across Europe and facilitate collaboration with other stakeholders, including patient organizations, rehabilitation professionals, and funding agencies.

Critical considerations for creating this organization include defining core activities, establishing governance principles focused on representativity and inclusion, and fostering relationships with existing national, European, and international organizations of PRM and academic medicine. By leveraging successful models like the Association of Academic Physiatrists in the United States, Europe can develop a robust and credible voice for academic PRM. This initiative is timely and necessary to capitalize on the current momentum and ensure the future of academic PRM in Europe.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

European Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Bodies Alliance. White book on physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) in Europe. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2018; 54: 125–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05144-4

https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05147-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05147-X

Frontera WR, Stucki G, Engkasan JP, Francisco GE, Gutenbrunner C, Hasnan N, et al. Advancing academic capacity in physical and rehabilitation medicine to strengthen rehabilitation in health systems worldwide: a joint effort by the European Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Association of Academic Physiatrists, and the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. J Rehabil Med 2022; 54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v54.3510

https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05728-9

Stucki G, Zampolini M, Selb M, Ceravolo MG, Delargy M, Varela Donoso E, et al. European framework of rehabilitation service types: the perspective of the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Section and Board of the European Union of Medical Specialists. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2019; 55: 411–417.

https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05728-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05728-9

Meyer T, Gutenbrunner C, Bickenbach J, Cieza A, Melvin J, Stucki G. Towards a conceptual description of rehabilitation as a health strategy. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43: 765–769.

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0865 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0865

Gutenbrunner C, Meyer T, Melvin J, Stucki G. Towards a conceptual description of physical and rehabilitation medicine. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43: 760–764.

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0866

Negrini S, Selb M, Kiekens C, Todhunter-Brown A, Arienti C, Stucki G, et al. Rehabilitation definition for research purposes: a global stakeholders’ initiative by Cochrane Rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2022; 58: 672–681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07509-8

https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002031

World Health Organization. Landmark resolution on strengthening rehabilitation in health systems (Internet). Geneva: WHO; 2023 (cited 2024 Sep 17). Available from: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA76/A76_R6-en.pdf.

World Health Organization. Rehabilitation 2030: A call for action (Internet). Geneva: WHO; 2017 (cited 2024 Sep 27). Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/rehabilitation-2030-a-call-for-action.

Seijas V, Kiekens C, Gimigliano F. Advancing the World Health Assembly’s landmark resolution on strengthening rehabilitation in health systems: unlocking the future of rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2023; 59: 447–451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08160-1

https://doi.org/0.23736/S1973-9087.23.08160-1

Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Functioning: the third health indicator in the health system and the key indicator for rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 53: 134–138.

https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04565-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04565-8

Stucki G, Post MWM. The Swiss Spinal Cord Injury (SwiSCI) cohort study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 90 Suppl: S1–S96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e318230fe6a

Bickenbach J, Rubinelli S, Baffone C, Stucki G. The human functioning revolution: implications for health systems and sciences. Front Rehabil Sci 2023; 4.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fsci.2023.1118512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsci.2023.1118512

Negrini S, Kiekens C. Functioning is becoming a global outcome and health indicator for medicine: does this strengthen or weaken its role of main rehabilitation unifying narrative? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2019;55(5): 539–541.

https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05996-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05996-3

Negrini S, Arienti C, Gimigliano F, Grubišić F, Howe T, Ilieva E, et al. Cochrane Rehabilitation: organisation and functioning. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 97: 68–71.

https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000832

Prepare Rehab. Transforming rehabilitation: personalised care for a better quality of life (Internet). Thessaloniki: European Union; 2022 (cited 2024 Sep 27). Available from: https://prepare-rehab.eu

Hripcsak G, Duke JD, Shah NH, Reich CG, Huser V, Schuemie MJ, et al. Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): opportunities for observational researchers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22: 225–231.

https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-574

Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) (Internet). New York: OHDSI; 2023 (cited 2024 Sep 27). Available from: https://ohdsi.org.

Bickenbach J, Post MWM, Stucki G, Fekete C. The International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) community survey: background, objectives, and design. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020; 101: S5–S16.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.06.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.06.011

Published

2025-01-03

How to Cite

Stucki, G., Stam, H. J., Gimigliano, F., & Negrini, S. (2025). Why we need a representative organization of academic PRM in Europe, and why we need it now. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 57, jrm42369. https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.42369

Issue

Section

Commentary

Categories