Cognitive reserve and disparities in healthcare usage after traumatic brain injury and stroke: an observational cohort study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.42400Keywords:
Acquired brain injury, educational level, healthcare utilizationAbstract
Background: Individuals with more education commonly have better outcome after brain injury, often attributed to cognitive reserve. However, evidence suggests that individuals with more education have better access to specialized care, potentially affecting outcomes.
Objective: To investigate differences in healthcare usage based on cognitive reserve and examine the relationship between healthcare usage and outcomes after stroke and traumatic brain injury.
Design: An observational cohort study with healthcare usage data from 3 years before to 4 years after injury, interviewing patients 5–15 years after injury.
Patients: A total of 83 participants suffering a stroke or traumatic brain injury.
Results: Healthcare usage over time varied based on educational level (repeated measures ANOVA, F(2, 227) = 4.17, p = 0.008). The differences in healthcare usage between educational levels was significant during the injury year (F(81) = –5.47, p = 0.022). Higher education implied more healthcare usage. Linear regression, controlling for possible confounders, confirmed the relationship between education and healthcare usage, (β = 4.3, p = 0.022). Healthcare usage was significantly related to long-term life satisfaction, but not to return to work.
Conclusion: Individuals with more education received more healthcare in the year after traumatic brain injury or stroke. However, this was not related to long-term outcome regarding return to work, but we found a relationship between healthcare usage and life satisfaction.
Downloads
References
Norup A, Kruse M, Soendergaard PL, Rasmussen KW, Biering-Sørensen F. Socioeconomic consequences of traumatic brain injury: a Danish nationwide register-based study. J Neurotrauma 2020; 37: 2694–2702.
https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2020.7064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2020.7064
Luengo-Fernandez R, Violato M, Candio P, Leal J. Economic burden of stroke across Europe: a population-based cost analysis. Eur Stroke J 2020; 5: 17–25.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987319883160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987319883160
Fiebig DG, van Gool K, Hall J, Mu C. Health care use in response to health shocks: does socio-economic status matter? Health Econ 2021; 30: 3032–3050.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4427
Agerholm J, Bruce D, Ponce de Leon A, Burström B. Socioeconomic differences in healthcare utilization, with and without adjustment for need: an example from Stockholm, Sweden. Scand J Public Health 2013; 41: 318–325.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812473205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812473205
Moore T, Kennedy J, McCarthy S. Exploring the general practitioner–pharmacist relationship in the community setting in Ireland. Int J Pharm Pract 2014; 22: 327–334.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12084
Wetterholm M, Turkiewicz A, Stigmar K, Hubertsson J, Englund M. The rate of joint replacement in osteoarthritis depends on the patient’s socioeconomic status. Acta Orthop 2016; 87: 245-251.
https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2016.1161451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2016.1161451
Fekete C, Debnar C, Scheel-Sailer A, Gemperli A. Does the socioeconomic status predict health service utilization in persons with enhanced health care needs? Results from a population-based survey in persons with spinal cord lesions from Switzerland. Int J Equity Health 2022; 21: 94-105.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01693-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01693-6
Teppo K, Jaakkola J, Biancari F, Halminen O, Linna M, Haukka J, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in use of rhythm control therapies in patients with incident atrial fibrillation: a Finnish nationwide cohort study. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2022; 41: 101070.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101070
Douthit N, Kiv S, Dwolatzky T, Biswas S. Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA. Public Health 2015; 129: 611-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.04.001
McMaughan DJ, Oloruntoba O, Smith ML. Socioeconomic status and access to healthcare: interrelated drivers for healthy aging. Frontiers in Public Health 2020; 8: 231.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00231
Rosenich E, Hordacre B, Paquet C, Koblar SA, Hillier SL. Cognitive reserve as an emerging concept in stroke recovery. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2020; 34: 187–199.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968320907071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968320907071
Manrique-Gutiérrez G, Rodríguez-Cayetano Q, Samudio-Cruz MA, Carrillo-Mora P. The role of cognitive reserve in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of observational studies. Brain Inj 2024; 38: 45–60.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2304876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2304876
Stern Y. What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2002; 8: 448–460.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617702813248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617702813248
Wang JJ, Boltyenkov A, Katz JM, O’Hara J, Gribko M, Sanelli PC. Striving for socioeconomic equity in ischemic stroke care: imaging and acute treatment utilization from a comprehensive stroke center. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19: 348–358.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.07.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.07.027
Gao S, Kumar RG, Wisniewski SR, Fabio A. Disparities in health care utilization of adults with traumatic brain injuries are related to insurance, race, and ethnicity: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2018; 33: E40–E50.
https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000338
Klang A, Molero Y, Lichtenstein P, Larsson H, D’Onofrio BM, Marklund N, et al. Access to rehabilitation after hospitalization for traumatic brain injury: a national longitudinal cohort study in Sweden. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2023; 37: 763–774.
https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683231209315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683231209315
Fugl-Meyer AR, Melin R, Fugl-Meyer KS. Life satisfaction in 18-to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 239–246.
https://doi.org/10.1080/165019702760279242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/165019702760279242
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361–370.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
McMillan T, Wilson L, Ponsford J, Levin H, Teasdale G, Bond M. The Glasgow Outcome Scale – 40 years of application and refinement. Nature Publishing Group 2016; 12: 477–485.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.89 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.89
Teasdale G, Maas A, Lecky F, Manley G, Stocchetti N, Murray G. The Glasgow Coma Scale at 40 years: standing the test of time. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13: 844–854.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70120-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70120-6
Starmark JE, Stålhammar D, Holmgren E. The Reaction Level Scale (RLS 85) – Manual and guidelines. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1988; 91: 12–20.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01400521 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01400521
Starmark JE, Stålhammar D, Holmgren E, Rosander B. A comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Reaction Level Scale (RLS85). J Neurosurg 1988; 69: 699–706.
https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1988.69.5.0699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1988.69.5.0699
Johnstone AJ, Lohlun JC, Miller JD, McIntosh CA, Gregori A, Brown R, et al. A comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Swedish Reaction Level Scale. Brain Inj 1993; 7: 501–506.
https://doi.org/10.3109/02699059309008177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02699059309008177
Jacobsson L, Lexell J. Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury: comparison of ratings with the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LiSat-11) and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2016: 14: 10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0405-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0405-y
Melin R, Fugl-Meyer KS, Fugl-Meyer AR. Life satisfaction in 18- to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to education, employment situation, health and physical activity. J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 84–90.
https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970306119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970306119
Frølich A, Ghith N, Schiøtz M, Jacobsen R, Stockmarr A. Multimorbidity, healthcare utilization and socioeconomic status: a register-based study in Denmark. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0214183.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214183
Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 97–107.
https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005
Sørensen K, Pelikan JM, Röthlin F, Ganahl K, Slonska Z, Doyle G, et al. Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). Eur J Public Health 2015; 25: 1053–1058.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv043
Miller TA. Health literacy and adherence to medical treatment in chronic and acute illness: a meta-analysis. Patient Educ Couns 2016; 99: 1079–1086.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.020
Pierce CA, Hanks RA. Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury and the World Health Organization model of disability. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 85: 889–898.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000242615.43129.ae DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000242615.43129.ae
Jacobsson LJ, Westerberg M, Malec JF, Lexell J. Sense of coherence and disability and the relationship with life satisfaction 6–15 years after traumatic brain injury in northern Sweden. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2011; 21: 383–400.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2011.566711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2011.566711
Mollayeva T, Tran A, Chan V, Colantonio A, Sutton M, Escobar MD. Decoding health status transitions of over 200 000 patients with traumatic brain injury from preceding injury to the injury event. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 5584.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08782-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08782-0
Teasell R, Salbach NM, Foley N, Mountain A, Cameron JI, Jong A, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: rehabilitation, recovery, and community participation following stroke. Int J Stroke 2020; 15:763–788.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493019897843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493019897843
Königs M, Beurskens EA, Snoep L, Scherder EJ, Oosterlaan J. Effects of timing and intensity of neurorehabilitation on functional outcome after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 99: 1149–1159.e1.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.013
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Natascha Ekdahl, Marianne Lannsjö, Britt-Marie Stålnacke, Marika Möller
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
