Delayed inpatient rehabilitation and functional outcomes for acute stroke: a retrospective cohort study in an Australian regional hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.42506Keywords:
Australia, Delay, Rehabilitation, Regional, Stroke, outcomesAbstract
Background: The impact of delayed inpatient rehabilitation on the functional outcomes of stroke patients has not been reported in regional Australia.
Objective: This study examined the impact of delayed inpatient rehabilitation following acute stroke on functional outcomes (Relative Functional Gain and Functional Independence Measure efficiency) and length of stay in rehabilitation at a regional Australian hospital.
Methods: Rehabilitation initiated > 24 h after a patient was deemed clinically ready was considered delayed. Associations between delayed inpatient rehabilitation and functional outcomes were investigated with mixed effects linear regression while length of stay was modelled using a negative binomial regression.
Results: Of a total 487 patients, 301 (61.8%) experienced delayed inpatient rehabilitation, with a median delay of 2 days (interquartile range: 1–4 days). Multivariate regressions showed delayed inpatient rehabilitation was negatively associated with Relative Functional Gain (Beta: –0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: –0.11, –0.02, p = 0.009) and Functional Independence Measure efficiency (Beta: –0.18, 95% CI: –0.32, –0.04, p = 0.014), but positively associated with length of stay in rehabilitation wards (incidence rate ratio: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.21, p = 0.021). Bed unavailability was the leading cause of delay.
Conclusion: Delayed inpatient rehabilitation is associated with poorer functional outcomes in stroke patients. Timely access to rehabilitation is crucial for optimising recovery.
Downloads
References
He F, Blackberry I, Yao L, Xie H, Rasekaba T, Mnatzaganian G. Pooled incidence and case-fatality of acute stroke in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macao: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2022; 17: e0270554.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270554
Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, Choo PL, Forster A, Morris J, et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014: CD001920.
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006275
Li X, He Y, Wang D, Rezaei MJ. Stroke rehabilitation: from diagnosis to therapy. Front Neurol 2024; 15: 1402729.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1402729 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1402729
Sommer CJ, Schäbitz WR. Principles and requirements for stroke recovery science. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2021; 41: 471–485.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X20970048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X20970048
National Clinical Guideline for Stroke for the UK and Ireland. Rehabilitation and recovery – principles of rehabilitation 2023. Available from: https://www.strokeguideline.org/chapter/rehabilitation-and-recovery-principles-of-rehabilitation/
Stroke Foundation. Australian and New Zealand Living Clinical Guidelines for Stroke. Chapter 5 of 8: Rehabilitation 2023 [cited 2024 Nov 15]. v10.1: Available from: https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/Kj2R8j.
Lee S-H. Stroke revisited: hemorrhagic stroke: Springer; 2018. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-10-1427-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1427-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1427-7
Coleman ER, Moudgal R, Lang K, Hyacinth HI, Awosika OO, Kissela BM, et al. Early rehabilitation after stroke: a narrative review. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2017; 19: 59.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-017-0686-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-017-0686-6
Pollack MRP, Disler PB. 2: Rehabilitation of patients after stroke. Med J Aust 2002; 177: 452–456.
https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04891.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04891.x
Bradley L, Wheelwright S. The impact of delays in transfer to specialist rehabilitation on outcomes in patients with acquired brain injury. Clin Rehabil 2024; 38: 1552–1558.
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241284866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241284866
Mairami FF, Warren N, Allotey PA, Reidpath DD. Contextual factors that shape recovery after stroke in Malaysia. Disabil Rehabil 2020; 42: 3189–3198.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1588399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1588399
Jackson SM, Neibling BA, Barker RN. Stroke survivors’ perspectives on recovering in rural and remote Australia: a systematic mixed studies review. Aust Occup Ther J 2022; 69: 214–230.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12779
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health workforce 2022 [updated 2022/07/07]. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/workforce/health-workforce.
He F, Mnatzaganian G, Rutherford D, Njovu M, Blackberry I. Weekend/holiday effect on stroke mortality in regional Australia: a ten-year retrospective study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2024; 33: 107739.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107739
He F, Mnatzaganian G, Njovu M, Rutherford D, Alexander T, Blackberry I. Rehabilitation success and related costs following stroke in a regional hospital: a retrospective analysis based on the Australian National Subacute and Non-Acute Patient (AN-SNAP) classification. BMC Health Serv Res 2025; 25: 126.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-12090-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-12090-w
Mosalski S, Shiner CT, Lannin NA, Cadilhac DA, Faux SG, Kim J, et al. Increased relative functional gain and improved stroke outcomes: a linked registry study of the impact of rehabilitation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021; 30: 106015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106015
Alexander TL, Simmonds FD, Capell JT, Green LJ. AROC Impairment Specific Report, Stroke Report, Inpatient-Pathway 3, January 2018–December 2018 2019. Available from: https://documents.uow.edu.au/content/groups/public/@web/@chsd/@aroc/documents/doc/uow256902.pdf
Kwah LK, Diong J. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). J Physiother 2014; 60: 61.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2013.12.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2013.12.012
Cadilhac DA, Kilkenny MF, Levi CR, Lannin NA, Thrift AG, Kim J, et al. Risk-adjusted hospital mortality rates for stroke: evidence from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (AuSCR). Med J Aust 2017; 206: 345–350.
https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.00525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.00525
Belagaje SR. Stroke rehabilitation. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2017; 23(1, Cerebrovascular Disease): 238–253.
https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000000423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000000423
Alia C, Spalletti C, Lai S, Panarese A, Lamola G, Bertolucci F, et al. Neuroplastic changes following brain ischemia and their contribution to stroke recovery: novel approaches in neurorehabilitation. Front Cell Neurosci 2017; 11: 76.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00076
Biernaskie J, Chernenko G, Corbett D. Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 1245–1254.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3834-03.2004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3834-03.2004
Tang E, Moran N, Cadman M, Hill S, Sloan C, Warburton E. Stroke rehabilitation in adults: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ 2024; 384: q498.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q498
Bowley JJ, Faulkner K, Finch J, Gavaghan B, Foster M. Understanding the experiences of rural- and remote-living patients accessing sub-acute care in Queensland: a qualitative descriptive analysis. J Multidiscip Healthc 2022; 15: 2945-2955.
https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S391738 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S391738
Vratsistas-Curto A, Shiner CT, Klein L, Faux SG. Cross-sectional survey of rehabilitation service availability for stroke and hip fracture in Australian public hospitals. Aust J Rural Health 2021; 29: 958–971.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12803
Bartlett BN, Vanhoudt NN, Wang H, Anderson AA, Juliar DL, Bartelt JM, et al. Optimizing inpatient bed management in a rural community-based hospital: a quality improvement initiative. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23: 1000.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10008-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10008-6
Williams E, D’Amore W, McMeeken J. Physiotherapy in rural and regional Australia. Aust J Rural Health 2007; 15: 380–386.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00931.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00931.x
Salter K, Jutai J, Hartley M, Foley N, Bhogal S, Bayona N, et al. Impact of early vs delayed admission to rehabilitation on functional outcomes in persons with stroke. J Rehabil Med 2006; 38: 113-117.
https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970500314350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970500314350
Görgülü B, Dong J, Hunter K, Bettio KM, Vukusic B, Ranisau J, et al. Association between delayed discharge from acute care and rehabilitation outcomes and length of stay: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2023; 104: 43-51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.05.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.05.017
Costa AP, Poss JW, Peirce T, Hirdes JP. Acute care inpatients with long-term delayed-discharge: evidence from a Canadian health region. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12: 172.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-172
Sumida M, Fujimoto M, Tokuhiro A, Tominaga T, Magara A, Uchida R. Early rehabilitation effect for traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 391–395.
https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.19780 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.19780
Sánchez-Rodríguez D, Miralles R, Muniesa JM, Mojal S, Abadía-Escartín A, Vázquez-Ibar O. Three measures of physical rehabilitation effectiveness in elderly patients: a prospective, longitudinal, comparative analysis. BMC Geriatr 2015; 15: 142.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0138-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0138-5
Liu N, Cadilhac DA, Andrew NE, Zeng L, Li Z, Li J, et al. Randomized controlled trial of early rehabilitation after intracerebral hemorrhage stroke: difference in outcomes within 6 months of stroke. Stroke 2014; 45: 3502–3507.
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005661
Bai Y, Hu Y, Wu Y, Zhu Y, He Q, Jiang C, et al. A prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial on the effect of early rehabilitation on daily activities and motor function of patients with hemorrhagic stroke. J Clin Neurosci 2012; 19: 1376–1379.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2011.10.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2011.10.021
Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, Bragoni M, Coiro P, De Angelis D, et al. Functional outcome of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients after inpatient rehabilitation: a matched comparison. Stroke 2003; 34: 2861–2865.
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000102902.39759.D3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000102902.39759.D3
Stineman MG, Bates BE, Kurichi JE, Kwong PL, Ripley DC, Vogel WB, et al. Initial physical grades and cognitive stages after acute stroke: who receives comprehensive rehabilitation services? PM R 2013; 5: 1007–1018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.08.598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.08.598
Tanlaka E, King-Shier K, Green T, Seneviratne C, Dukelow S. Inpatient rehabilitation care in Alberta: how much does stroke severity and timing matter? Can J Neurol Sci 2019; 46: 691–701.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2019.276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2019.276
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fan He, Irene Blackberry, Michael Njovu , David Rutherford , George Mnatzaganian

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.