Ukrainian war trauma patients abroad: the rehabilitation process in light of language barriers, cultural differences, war, and infection isolation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.42929Keywords:
armed conflicts, communication barriers, culturally competent care, multiple trauma, patient isolation, patient participation, rehabilitationAbstract
Objective: To study the rehabilitation of Ukrainian war trauma patients abroad, focusing on 5 areas of particular interest: communication, cultural differences, infection isolation, psychosocial load, and the rehabilitation process.
Design: Observational study.
Subjects: (i) 14 Ukrainian patients who underwent rehabilitation at Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Norway; (ii) 15 members of multidisciplinary teams providing war trauma rehabilitation.
Methods: Combined methods. Patients: medical file review, Client Satisfaction Questionnaire 8, custom questionnaire on the 5 focal areas. Hospital staff: focus-group interviews.
Results: Patients preferred professional interpreters, while multilingual staff served an additional role in providing psychological support and cultural mediation. All patients experienced infection isolation, and health professionals worried about the added psychological strain this entailed. Patients reported high trust in the therapists and high satisfaction with rehabilitation. Although war and infection isolation were negative influences, patients reported overall good mood. Health professionals reported becoming more skilled at facilitating rehabilitation under these conditions.
Conclusion: Despite challenges within the 5 areas assessed, providing rehabilitation to patients evacuated from a country at war is feasible and valuable for patients and health professionals. Both patients and health professionals showed willingness to adapt to foreign concepts, perhaps aided by multilingual health professionals acting as cultural mediators.
Downloads
References
Holtan A, Ottesen F, Hoel CC, Iversen P, Olsen S, Thorbjørnsen M. Medical evacuation of patients from war-torn Ukraine to Norwegian hospitals. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2023; 143. https://tidsskriftet.no/en/2023/05/perspectives/medical-evacuation-patients-war-torn-ukraine-norwegian-hospitals DOI: https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.23.0286
Clark JR, Shlobin NA, Batra A, Liotta EM. The relationship between limited English proficiency and outcomes in stroke prevention, management, and rehabilitation: a systematic review. Front Neurol 2022; 13: 790553.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.790553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.790553
Grandpierre V, Milloy V, Sikora L, Fitzpatrick E, Thomas R, Potter B. Barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation services: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18: 23.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2811-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2811-1
Mirza M, Harrison EA, Roman M, Miller KA, Jacobs EA. Walking the talk: understanding how language barriers affect the delivery of rehabilitation services. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44: 301–314.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1767219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1767219
Norwegian Directorate of Health. Rehabilitation, habilitation, individual plan and coordinator, chapter 4. Participation, information and communication. Communication via interpreters for individuals with limited Norwegian language skills, deaf, severely hearing impaired, and deafblind. 2015. Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/veiledere/rehabilitering-habilitering-individuell-plan-og-koordinator/medvirkning-informasjon-og-kommunikasjon#kommunikasjon-via-tolk-for-personer-med-begrensede-norskkunnskaper-dove-sterkt-horselshemmede-og-dovblinde
Shiner CT, Bramah V, Wu J, Faux SG, Watanabe Y. Health care interpreter use in an inpatient rehabilitation setting: examining patterns of use and associated clinical outcomes. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45: 2149–2159.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2086637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2086637
Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. Ukrainian Trust In Social Institutions. 2012. Available from: https://kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=81
Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. Dynamics of trust in social institutions in 2021–2022. 2023. Available from: https://kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=1174&page=1
Health Strategic Advisory Group of Ukraine. National Health Reform Strategy for Ukraine 2015–2020. 2015. Available from: https://healthsag.org.ua/en/strategiya/
Luker S, Laver K, Lane R, Potter E, Harrod A, Bierer P, et al. ‘Put in a room and left’: a qualitative study exploring the lived experiences of COVID-19 isolation and quarantine among rehabilitation inpatients. Ann Med 2023; 55: 198–206.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2155698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2155698
Colorado B, Del Toro D, Tarima S. Impact of contact isolation on FIM score change, FIM efficiency score, and length of stay in patients in acute inpatient rehabilitation facility. PM R 2014; 6: 988–991.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.05.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.05.017
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Operational public health considerations for the prevention and control of infectious diseases in the context of Russia’s aggression towards Ukraine. Stockholm: ECDC; 2022. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/operational-public-health-considerations-prevention-and-control-infectious
Granata G, Petersen E, Capone A, Donati D, Andriolo B, Gross M, et al. The impact of armed conflict on the development and global spread of antibiotic resistance: a systematic review. Clin Microbiol Infect 2024; 30: 858–865.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2024.03.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2024.03.029
Bilewicz M, Babińska M, Gromova A. High rates of probable PTSD among Ukrainian war refugees: the role of intolerance of uncertainty, loss of control and subsequent discrimination. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2024; 15: 2394296.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2024.2394296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2024.2394296
Markova MV, Aliieva T, Markov АR, Korop OA, Lisovaya EV, Babych VV, et al. Disorders of adaptation of combatants and their medical and psychological rehabilitation at the sanatorium stage of treatment. Wiad Lek 2022; 75: 444–450. https://wiadlek.pl/wp-content/uploads/archive/2022/02/WLek202202121.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202202121
World Health Organization. Ukraine. WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health. Situational Assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Situation assessment of rehabilitation in Ukraine. 2021. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/349595
Archer A, Harper L, Cameron D. Understanding rehabilitation in Ukraine from the perspective of key informants. Disabil Rehabil 2020; 42: 267–273.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1496488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1496488
Golyk V, Syvak O, Grabljevec K, Tederko P, Gutenbrunner C, Nugraha B. Five years after development of the national disability, health and rehabilitation plan for Ukraine: achievements and challenges. J Rehabil Med 2021; 53: jrm00160.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2792
World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). [cited 28.12.2024]. Available from: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health
Stucki G, Zampolini M, Juocevicius A, Negrini S, Christodoulou N. Practice, science and governance in interaction: European effort for the system-wide implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 53: 299–307.
https://doi.org/10.23736/s1973-9087.16.04436-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04436-1
Campbell S, Greenwood M, Prior S, Shearer T, Walkem K, Young S, et al. Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. J Res Nurs 2020; 25: 652–661.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann 1979; 2: 197–207.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6
Nguyen TD, Attkisson CC, Stegner BL. Assessment of patient satisfaction: development and refinement of a service evaluation questionnaire. Eval Program Plann 1983; 6: 299–313.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(83)90010-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(83)90010-1
Attkisson CC, Greenfield TK. The UCSF Client Satisfaction Scales: I. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8. In: M. E. Maruish, editor. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004: p. 799–911.
Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B. Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J 2008; 204: 291–295.
https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192
Barriball KL, While A. Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. J Adv Nurs 1994; 19: 328–335.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01088.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01088.x
Burnard P, Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B. Analysing and presenting qualitative data. Br Dent J 2008; 204: 429–432.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.292
Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Isolation guide. Use of patient isolation to prevent the spread of infection in healthcare institutions; 2004 Available from: https://www.fhi.no/publ/eldre/isoleringsveilederen/
Uhlin K, Persson E, Bäärnhielm S, Borg K, Löfgren M, Stålnacke BM. Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation for immigrants with chronic pain who need language interpretation. J Rehabil Med 2024; 56: jrm13466.
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.13466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.13466
Patil S, Davies P. Use of Google Translate in medical communication: evaluation of accuracy. Br Med J 2014; 349: g7392.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7392
Heath M, Hvass AMF, Wejse CM. Interpreter services and effect on healthcare: a systematic review of the impact of different types of interpreters on patient outcome. J Migr Health 2023; 7: 100162.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmh.2023.100162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmh.2023.100162
Gillett JL, Duff J, Eaton R, Finlay K. Psychological outcomes of MRSA isolation in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 2020; 6: 63.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-020-0313-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-020-0313-6
Olena Zelenska’s initiative “Barrier-free”. Vocabulary of preferred terminology. 2021 [cited 17.01.25]; Available from: https://bf.in.ua/en/vocabulary-of-preferred-terminology/
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Ryssdal Kraby, Mariia Toropchyna, Anders Holtan, Frank Becker
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
