Evolution of bowel function and quality of life after spinal cord injury: a longitudinal registry and survey study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.44175Keywords:
spinal cord injuries, Neurogenic bowel, Health-Related Quality Of LifeAbstract
Objective: To assess changes in bowel function and quality of life over time in adults with spinal cord injury.
Design: Retrospective cohort study linking clinical registry data with patient-reported outcomes.
Subjects: 236 adults with spinal cord injury in Sweden; 157 had both baseline and follow-up data.
Methods: Data from the Swedish National Quality Registry for Rehabilitation Medicine were merged with responses from the 2024 Swedish International Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey. Bowel dysfunction was assessed using the Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale, Constipation Scoring System, and St. Mark’s Incontinence Score. Quality of life was measured using the 3L EQ-5D questionnaire at baseline and the 5L version at follow-up, converted to a common scale. Group differences were analysed using χ2 and Mann–Whitney U tests. Logistic regression identified predictors of bowel outcomes; linear regression assessed factors associated with quality-of-life scores.
Results: At baseline, 70% had bowel dysfunction and a mean quality-of-life score of 0.33. Bowel dysfunction was the only independent predictor of lower baseline quality of life. At follow-up, severe incontinence and high bowel burden predicted lower scores. Incomplete injury predicted improvement.
Conclusion: Bowel dysfunction is common and closely linked to reduced quality of life after spinal cord injury. Early and sustained management is essential.
Downloads
References
Byrne CM, Pager CK, Rex J, Roberts R, Solomon MJ. Assessment of quality of life in the treatment of patients with neuropathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1431–1436.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6444-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6444-1
Correa GI, Rotter KP. Clinical evaluation and management of neurogenic bowel after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2000; 38: 301–308.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100851
Liu CW, Huang CC, Yang YH, Chen SC, Weng MC, Huang MH. Relationship between neurogenic bowel dysfunction and health-related quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 2009; 41: 35–40.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0277
Sober-Williams EK, Lee RHY, Whitehurst DGT, McBride CB, Willms R, Claydon VE. Bowel burdens: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the relationships between bowel dysfunction and quality of life after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2024; 62: 495–506.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-024-01002-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-024-01002-8
Melin J, Axwalter E, Åhrén G, Sunnerhagen KS, Lundgren-Nilsson Å, Wangdell J. Research priorities to enhance life for people with spinal cord injury: a Swedish priority setting partnership. Spinal Cord 2023; 61: 570–577.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-023-00913-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-023-00913-2
Rodriguez GM, Gater DR. Neurogenic bowel and management after spinal cord injury: a narrative review. J Pers Med 2022; 12.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071141
Trgovcevic S, Milicevic M, Nedovic G, Jovanic G. Health condition and quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury. Iran J Public Health 2014; 43: 1229–1238.
Dudley-Javoroski S, Lee J, Shields RK. Cognitive function, quality of life, and aging: relationships in individuals with and without spinal cord injury. Physiother Theory Pract 2022; 38: 36–45.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2020.1712755 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2020.1712755
Zwecker M, Heled E, Bondi M, Zeilig G, Bluvstein V, Catz A, et al. Determinants of quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury using structural equation modeling. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2022; 103: 2375–2382.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.009
Putzke JD, Barrett JJ, Richards JS, Underhill AT, Lobello SG. Life satisfaction following spinal cord injury: long-term follow-up. J Spinal Cord Med 2004; 27: 106–110.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2004.11753739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2004.11753739
Jörgensen S, Costa Andersson MV, Lexell J. Changes in health-related quality of life among older adults aging with long-term spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2021; 59: 769–776.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-00579-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-00579-0
Fekete C, Brach M, Ehrmann C, Post MWM, Stucki G. Cohort profile of the International Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey implemented in 22 countries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020; 101: 2103–2111.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.01.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.01.022
Gross-Hemmi MH, Post MW, Ehrmann C, Fekete C, Hasnan N, Middleton JW, et al. Study protocol of the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) Community Survey. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 96: S23–s34.
https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0000000000000647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000647
(SveReh) SRfR. The Swedish National Medical Quality Registry for PM&R. 2023 [cited 20231009]. Available from: https://svereh.registercentrum.se/om-registret/arsrapporter/p/r1szcwQZY.
Sunnerhagen KS, Flansbjer UB, Lannsjö M, Tölli A, Lundgren-Nilsson A. WebRehab: a Swedish database for quality control in rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2014; 46: 958–962.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1886 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1886
Fekete C, Post MW, Bickenbach J, Middleton J, Prodinger B, Selb M, et al. A structured approach to capture the lived experience of spinal cord injury: data model and questionnaire of the International Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 96: S5–s16.
https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0000000000000622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000622
Kalpakjian CZ, Scelza WM, Forchheimer MB, Toussaint LL. Preliminary reliability and validity of a Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale. J Spinal Cord Med 2007; 30: 131–139.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2007.11753924 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2007.11753924
Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 681–685.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02056950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02056950
Maeda Y, Parés D, Norton C, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA. Does the St. Mark’s incontinence score reflect patients’ perceptions? A review of 390 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 436–442.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9157-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9157-4
Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 1999; 44: 77–80.
https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.44.1.77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.44.1.77
Ustün TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Schneider M. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 565–571.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0963828031000137063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0963828031000137063
Burström K, Sun S, Gerdtham UG, Henriksson M, Johannesson M, Levin L, et al. Swedish experience-based value sets for EQ-5D health states. Qual Life Res 2014; 23: 431–442.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0496-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0496-4
Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001; 33: 337–343.
https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890109002087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890109002087
van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng YS, Kohlmann T, Busschbach J, Golicki D, et al. Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health 2012; 15: 708–715.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008
Josefson C, Rekand T, Lundgren-Nilsson Å, Sunnerhagen KS. Epidemiology of spinal cord injury in adults in Sweden, 2016–2020: a retrospective registry-based study. Neuroepidemiology 2025; 59: 334–342.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000540818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000540818
Ture SD, Ozkaya G, Sivrioglu K. Relationship between neurogenic bowel dysfunction severity and functional status, depression, and quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2023; 46: 424–432.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2021.2021043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2021.2021043
Khadour FA, Khadour YA, Xu J, Meng L, Cui L, Xu T. Effect of neurogenic bowel dysfunction symptoms on quality of life after a spinal cord injury. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18: 458.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03946-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03946-8
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Charlotta Josefson, Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
