Women and men profit equally from cardiac rehabilitation: a secondary analysis of the OPTICARE RCT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.44504Keywords:
cardiovascular disease, Cardiac Rehabilitation, sex differences, lifestyle, psychological wellbeing., Cardiovascular Risk Factors, aerobic capacityAbstract
Purpose: To explore sex-specific differences in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) outcomes.
Methods: Aerobic capacity (6-Minute Walk Test), physical behaviour (accelerometer), cardiovascular risk profile (weight, blood pressure, cholesterol), and psychosocial well-being (questionnaires) were measured in patients after an acute coronary syndrome (147 women, 642 men) at CR start and completion, and 18 months’ follow-up. Sex differences were studied using GEE models adjusted for age and differences in baseline characteristics. Additionally, whether men and women met targets associated with health risk reductions was assessed.
Results: Both sexes experienced similar CR benefits. Only for depressive symptoms did women show larger improvements (HADS score; ♀: –2.7 vs ♂: –1.1; p = 0.017). Nevertheless, long-term follow-up revealed women still lagged in meeting targets for physical activity (♀: 76.5% vs ♂: 93.1%; p < 0.001) and anxiety symptoms (♀: 75.5% vs ♂: 86.8%; p < 0.001), while men lagged in meeting aerobic capacity targets (♀: 71.3% vs ♂: 58.8%; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Women experience similar CR benefits to men in aerobic capacity, physical behaviour, cardiovascular risk profile, anxiety, and quality of life, with greater improvement in depressive symptoms. However, target values were less often met by women in physical behaviour and psychosocial well-being, and by men in aerobic capacity. Tailored CR programmes may be needed to address the unique needs of women and men.
Downloads
References
Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson DR, Zwisler AD, Rees K, Martin N, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67: 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044
Townsend N, Wilson L, Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe K, Rayner M, Nichols M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update 2016. Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 3232–3245.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw334
Cugusi L, Mercuro G. A systematic overview to quantify the gender imbalance in cardiovascular rehabilitation trials. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2019; 26: 776–781.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487318811415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487318811415
Oosenbrug E, Marinho RP, Zhang J, Marzolini S, Colella TJ, Pakosh M, et al. Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation adherence: a meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol 2016; 32: 1316–1324.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2016.01.036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2016.01.036
Vynckier P, Ferrannini G, Ryden L, Jankowski P, De Backer T, Gevaert S, et al. Gender gap in risk factor control of coronary patients far from closing: results from the European Society of Cardiology EUROASPIRE V registry. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2020; 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa144.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa144
Hazelton G, Williams JW, Wakefield J, Perlman A, Kraus WE, Wolever RQ. Psychosocial benefits of cardiac rehabilitation among women compared with men. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2014; 34: 21–28.
https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000034
Ford ES, Mokdad AH, Li C, McGuire LC, Strine TW, Okoro CA, et al. Gender differences in coronary heart disease and health-related quality of life: findings from 10 states from the 2004 behavioral risk factor surveillance system. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008; 17: 757–768.
https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2007.0468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2007.0468
Turk-Adawi KI, Oldridge NB, Vitcenda MJ, Tarima SS, Grace SL. Secondary prevention recommendation attainment with cardiac rehabilitation: is there a gender disparity? Womens Health Issues 2016; 26: 278–287.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2016.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2016.03.004
Terada T, Chirico D, Tulloch HE, Scott K, Pipe AL, Reed JL. Sex differences in psychosocial and cardiometabolic health among patients completing cardiac rehabilitation. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2019; 44: 1237–1245.
https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2018-0876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2018-0876
Barth J, Volz A, Schmid JP, Kohls S, von Kanel R, Znoj H, et al. Gender differences in cardiac rehabilitation outcomes: do women benefit equally in psychological health? J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009; 18: 2033–2039.
https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2008.1058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2008.1058
Rengo JL, Khadanga S, Savage PD, Ades PA. Response to exercise training during cardiac rehabilitation differs by sex. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2020; 40: 319–324.
https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000536
Gee MA, Viera AJ, Miller PF, Tolleson-Rinehart S. Functional capacity in men and women following cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2014; 34: 255–262.
https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000066
Sunamura M, Ter Hoeve N, van den Berg-Emons RJG, Geleijnse ML, Haverkamp M, Stam HJ, et al. Randomised controlled trial of two advanced and extended cardiac rehabilitation programmes. Heart 2018; 104: 430–437.
https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311681
Sunamura M, Ter Hoeve N, van den Berg-Emons HJ, Haverkamp M, Redekop K, Geleijnse ML, et al. OPTImal CArdiac REhabilitation (OPTICARE) following acute coronary syndromes: rationale and design of a randomised, controlled trial to investigate the benefits of expanded educational and behavioural intervention programs. Neth Heart J 2013; 21: 324–330.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-013-0422-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-013-0422-y
Ter Hoeve N, Sunamura M, Stam HJ, Boersma E, Geleijnse ML, van Domburg RT, et al. Effects of two behavioral cardiac rehabilitation interventions on physical activity: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Cardiol 2018; 255: 221–228.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.015
Piepoli MF, Corra U, Benzer W, Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Dendale P, Gaita D, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2010; 17: 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283313592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283313592
ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. 2002/07/02 ed; 2002. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102
Enright PL, Sherrill DL. Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 158: 1384–1387.
https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9710086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9710086
Bussmann JB, van den Berg-Emons RJ. To total amount of activity … and beyond: perspectives on measuring physical behavior. Front Psychol 2013; 4: 463.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00463 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00463
Stens NA, Bakker EA, Manas A, Buffart LM, Ortega FB, Lee DC, et al. Relationship of daily step counts to all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 82: 1483–1494.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.07.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.07.029
Ekelund U, Tarp J, Steene-Johannessen J, Hansen BH, Jefferis B, Fagerland MW, et al. Dose–response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ 2019; 366: l4570.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4570
Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 2315–2381.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106
WHO Expert Committee. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry; 1995. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241208546
Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002; 52: 69–77.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3
Post MW, van der Zee CH, Hennink J, Schafrat CG, Visser-Meily JM, van Berlekom SB. Validity of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation. Disabil Rehabil 2012; 34: 478–485.
https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.608148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.608148
De Gucht V, Van Elderen T, van der Kamp L, Oldridge N. Quality of life after myocardial infarction: translation and validation of the MacNew Questionnaire for a Dutch population. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 1483–1488.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000040792.25240.38 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000040792.25240.38
Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1.9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health 2018; 6: e1077–e1086.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7
Holven KB, Roeters van Lennep J. Sex differences in lipids: a life course approach. Atherosclerosis 2023; 384: 117270.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2023.117270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2023.117270
Smith JR, Thomas RJ, Bonikowske AR, Hammer SM, Olson TP. Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation outcomes. Circ Res 2022; 130: 552–565.
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319894 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319894
Lavie CJ, Menezes AR, De Schutter A, Milani RV, Blumenthal JA. Impact of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training on psychological risk factors and subsequent prognosis in patients with cardiovascular disease. Can J Cardiol 2016; 32: S365–S373.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2016.07.508 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2016.07.508
Pogosova N, Kotseva K, De Bacquer D, von Kanel R, De Smedt D, Bruthans J, et al. Psychosocial risk factors in relation to other cardiovascular risk factors in coronary heart disease: results from the EUROASPIRE IV survey. A registry from the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2017; 24: 1371–1380.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487317711334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487317711334
Buckland SA, Pozehl B, Yates B. Depressive symptoms in women with coronary heart disease: a systematic review of the longitudinal literature. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2019; 34: 52–59.
https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000533
Terada T, Vidal-Almela S, Tulloch HE, Pipe AL, Reed JL. Cardiac rehabilitation following percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with superior psychological health and quality of life in males but not in females. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2021; 41: 345–350.
https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000597
Murphy BM, Rogerson MC, Hesselson S, Iismaa SE, Hoover V, Le Grande M, et al. Prevalence of anxiety, depression, and distress in SCAD and non-SCAD AMI patients: a comparative study. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2023; 43: 338–345.
https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000782 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000782
Lichtman JH, Froelicher ES, Blumenthal JA, Carney RM, Doering LV, Frasure-Smith N, et al. Depression as a risk factor for poor prognosis among patients with acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and recommendations: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014; 129: 1350–1369.
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000019
Clark AM, King-Shier KM, Duncan A, Spaling M, Stone JA, Jaglal S, et al. Factors influencing referral to cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention programs: a systematic review. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2013; 20: 692–700.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487312447846 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487312447846
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nienke ter Hoeve, Marie de Bakker, Madoka Sunamura, Jeanine E. Roeters van Lennep, Eric Boersma, Rita J.G. van den Berg-Emons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
