Robot-assisted therapy following stroke: what effects on quality of life, cognitive and psychosocial outcomes? A systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.44943Keywords:
Stroke, Multidisciplinary rehabilitation, Robot-assisted therapy (RAT), Systematic Review, Cognition, Quality of LifeAbstract
Objective: Robot-assisted therapy (RAT) has shown promise in post-stroke motor recovery. However, its effects on non-motor outcomes remain unclear. This systematic review evaluated RAT impact on post-stroke quality of life (QoL), cognition, and psychosocial functioning.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, electronic searches were performed from Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO. Risk of bias was assessed using NIH Quality Assessment Tools. Data on study design, participants, intervention characteristics, outcomes, and results were extracted and synthetized descriptively.
Results: A total of 90 studies met the inclusion criteria. Considerable heterogeneity was found in participants’ characteristics, intervention duration (2–52 weeks), and dosage (20–240 min/session). Most studies reported significant RAT effects on QoL (emotional, physical, cognitive, social subdomains), cognition (attention, executive functions, memory, language, visuo-spatial abilities, intelligence), and psychosocial outcomes (anxiety, depression, self-efficacy, fear of falling, motivation, coping). Some studies also showed greater improvements compared with conventional training controls. Longitudinal effects were generally absent, except for QoL variations observed up to 12 months. Cognitive and psychological factors were also identified as moderators/predictors of RAT response.
Conclusion: Despite variability across studies, findings suggest RAT may have a broad impact beyond motor recovery. Future large-scale, standardized, longitudinal trials are recommended to confirm these results.
Downloads
References
Steinmetz JD, Seeher KM, Schiess N, Nichols E, Cao B, Servili C, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of disorders affecting the nervous system, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23: 344-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00038-3
Pu L, Wang L, Zhang R, Zhao T, Jiang Y, Han L. Projected global trends in ischemic stroke incidence, deaths and disability-adjusted life years from 2020 to 2030. Stroke 2023;5: 1330-1339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040073
Alt Murphy M, Pradhan S, Levin MF, Hancock NJ. Uptake of technology for neurorehabilitation in clinical practice: a scoping review. Phys Ther 2024; 104: pzad140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzad140
Molteni F, Gasperini G, Cannaviello G, Guanziroli E. Exoskeleton and end-effector robots for upper and lower limbs rehabilitation: narrative review. PM & R 2018; 10(9S2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.06.005
Iandolo R, Marini F, Semprini M, Laffranchi M, Mugnosso M, Cherif A, et al. Perspectives and challenges in robotic neurorehabilitation. Appl Sci 2019;9: 3183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9153183
Giansanti D. The rehabilitation and the robotics: are they going together well? Healthcare 2020; 9: 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9010026
Calabrò RS, Sorrentino G, Cassio A, Mazzoli D, Andrenelli E, Bizzarini E, et al. Robotic-assisted gait rehabilitation following stroke: a systematic review of current guidelines and practical clinical recommendations. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06887-8
Morone G, Palomba A, Martino Cinnera A, Agostini M, Aprile I, Arienti C, et al. Systematic review of guidelines to identify recommendations for upper limb robotic rehabilitation after stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 57: 238-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06625-9
Zanatta F, Farhane-Medina NZ, Adorni R, Steca P, Giardini A, D’Addario M, et al. Combining robot-assisted therapy with virtual reality or using it alone? A systematic review on health-related quality of life in neurological patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2023;21: 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02097-y
Sun JH, Tan L, Yu JT. Post-stroke cognitive impairment: epidemiology, mechanisms and management. Ann Transl Med 2014; 2: 80.
Jokinen H, Melkas S, Ylikoski R, Pohjasvaara T, Kaste M, Erkinjunttiet T, al. Post-stroke cognitive impairment is common even after successful clinical recovery. Eur J Neurol 2015; 22: 1288-1294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12743
Devereux N, Berns AM. Evaluation & treatment of psychological effects of stroke. Del J Public Health 2023;9: 62-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32481/djph.2023.08.011
Hackett ML, Köhler S, O’Brien JT, Mead GE. Neuropsychiatric outcomes of stroke. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13: 525-534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70016-X
Park JG. Update on stroke rehabilitation for non-motor impairment. Brain Neurorehabil 2022; 15: e13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2022.15.e13
Reis SB, Bernardo WM, Oshiro CA, Krebs HI, Conforto AB. Effects of robotic therapy associated with non-invasive brain stimulation on upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2021; 35: 256-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968321989353
Qu Q, Lin Y, He Z, Fu J, Zou F, Jiang Z, et al. The effect of applying robotassisted task-oriented training using human-robot collaborative Interaction Force Control Technology on Upper Limb Function in Stroke Patients: Preliminary Findings. BioMed Res Int 2021; 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9916492
Rajashekar D, Boyer A, Larkin-Kaiser KA, Dukelow SP. Technological Advances in stroke rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2024; 35: 383-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2023.06.026
Proietti T, Ambrosini E, Pedrocchi A, Micera S. Wearable robotics for impaired upper-limb assistance and rehabilitation: state of the art and future perspectives. IEEE Access 2022;10: 106117-106134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3210514
Walker MF, Hoffmann TC, Brady MC, Dean CM, Eng JJ, Farrinet AJ, al. Improving the development, monitoring and reporting of stroke rehabilitation research: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke 2017; 12: 472-479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017711815
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. Published online March 29, 2021: n71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Steel P, Fariborzi H, Hendijani R. An application of modern literature review methodology: finding needles in evergrowing haystacks. New York: SAGE Publications; 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529667417
National Heart, Lung, and Blood institute. Study quality assessment. Available from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools
Stone J, Gurunathan U, Glass K, Munn Z, Tugwell P, Doi SAR. Stratification by quality induced selection bias in a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2019; 107: 51-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.015
Human Development Report. Human Development Index and its components (accessed November 2024). Available from: https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-index#/indicies/HDI
Adomavičienė A, Daunoravičienė K, Kubilius R, Varžaitytė L, Raistenskis J. Influence of new technologies on poststroke rehabilitation: a comparison of Armeo Spring to the Kinect System. Med Kaunas Lith 2019; 55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55040098
Ahn SY, Bok SK, Lee JY, Ryoo HW, Lee HY, Park HJ, et al. Benefits of robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation from the subacute stage after a stroke of varying severity: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med 2024; 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030808
Akinci M, Burak M, Kasal FZ, Özaslan EA, Huri M, Kurtaran ZA. The effects of combined virtual reality exercises and robot assisted gait training on cognitive functions, daily living activities, and quality of life in high functioning individuals with subacute stroke. Percept Mot Skills 2024;131: 756-769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125241235420
Ambrosini E, Gasperini G, Zajc J, Immick N, Augsten A, Rossini M, et al. A robotic system with EMG-triggered functional electrical stimulation for restoring arm functions in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2021; 35: 334-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968321997769
Aprile I, Guardati G, Cipollini V, Papadopoulou D, Monteleone S, Redolfi A, et al. Influence of cognitive impairment on the recovery of subjects with subacute stroke undergoing upper limb robotic rehabilitation. Brain Sci 2021; 11.
Aprile I, Germanotta M, Cruciani A, Pecchioli C, Loreti S, Papadopoulou D, et al. Poststroke shoulder pain in subacute patients and its correlation with upper limb recovery after robotic or conventional treatment: a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Int J Stroke 2021; 16: 396-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493020937192
Aprile I, Guardati G, Cipollini V, Papadopoulou D, Mastrorosa A, Castelli L, et al. Robotic rehabilitation: an opportunity to improve cognitive functions in subjects with stroke: an explorative study. Front Neurol 2020; 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.588285
Bergqvist M, Möller MC, Björklund M, Borg J, Palmcrantz S. The impact of visuospatial and executive function on activity performance and outcome after robotic or conventional gait training, long-term after stroke as part of a randomized controlled trial. PloS One 2023; 18: e0281212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281212
Bhattacharjee S, Barman A, Patel S, Sahoo J. The combined effect of robot assisted therapy and activities of daily living training on upper limb recovery in persons with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Published online 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.01.027
Bragoni M, Broccoli M, Iosa M, Morone G, De Angelis D, Venturiero V, et al. Influence of psychologic features on rehabilitation outcomes in patients with subacute stroke trained with robotic-aided walking therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 92: e16-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182a20a34
Calabrò R, De Cola M, Leo A, et al. Robotic neurorehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke: psychological wellbeing beyond motor improvement. Int J Rehabil Res 2015;38: 219-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000114
Calabrò R, Naro A, Russo M, Reitano S, Balletta T, Trombetta G, et al. Do post-stroke patients benefit from robotic verticalization? A pilot-study focusing on a novel neurophysiological approach. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2015; 33: 671-681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-140475
Castelli L, Iacovelli C, Loreti C, Malizia AM, Barone Ricciardelli I, Tomaino A, et al. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation for balance in stroke patients (ROAR-S): effects of cognitive, motor and functional outcomes. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2023; 27: 8198-8211.
Chen YW, Li KY, Lin CH, Hung PH, Lai HT, Wu CY. The effect of sequential combination of mirror therapy and robot-assisted therapy on motor function, daily function, and self-efficacy after stroke. Sci Rep 2023; 13: 16841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43981-3
Chen S, Kang J, Peng C, Hsu C, Lin Y, Lai C. Adjustable parameters and the effectiveness of adjunct robotassisted gait training in individuals with chronic stroke. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138186
Chien A, Chang F, Meng N, Yang P, Huang C, Chou L. Clinical efficacy of a new robot-assisted gait training system for acute stroke patients. J Med Biol Eng 2021; 41: 99-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-020-00590-z
Daunoraviciene K, Adomaviciene A, Grigonyte A, Griškevičius J, Juocevicius A. Effects of robot-assisted training on upper limb functional recovery during the rehabilitation of poststroke patients. Technol Health Care Off J Eur Soc Eng Med 2018; 26: 533-542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-182500
De Luca R, Maresca G, Balletta T, Cannavò A, Leonardi S, Latella D, et al. Does overground robotic gait training improve non-motor outcomes in patients with chronic stroke? Findings from a pilot study. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 81: 240-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.09.070
Degami A, Taki S, Imura T, Iwamoto Y, Imada N, Tanaka R, et al. Early initiation of exoskeletal robotic gait training improves functional outcomes in the patients with stroke: a retrospective observational study. Eur Neurol 2023; 86: 121-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000527710
Dehem S, Gilliaux M, Stoquart G, Detrembleur C, Jacquemin G, Palumboet S, al. Effectiveness of upper-limb robotic-assisted therapy in the early rehabilitation phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2019; 62: 313-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.04.002
Dundar U, Toktas H, Solak O, Ulasli A, Eroglu S. A comparative study of conventional physiotherapy versus robotic training combined with physiotherapy in patients with stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2014; 21: 453-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr2106-453
Elmas Bodur B, Erdoğanoğlu Y, Asena Sel S. Effects of robotic-assisted gait training on physical capacity, and quality of life among chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 2024; 120: 129-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2024.01.010
Fasoli S, Adans-Dester C. A paradigm shift: rehabilitation robotics, cognitive skills training, and function after stroke. Front Neurol 2019; 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01088
Fundarò C, Giardini A, Maestri R, Traversoni S, Bartolo M, Casale R. Motor and psychosocial impact of robot-assisted gait training in a real-world rehabilitation setting: a pilot study. PLoS One 2018; 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191894
Gueye T, Dedkova M, Rogalewicz V, Grunerova-Lippertova M, Angerova Y. Early post-stroke rehabilitation for upper limb motor function using virtual reality and exoskeleton: equally efficient in older patients. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2021; 55: 91-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5603/PJNNS.a2020.0096
Ha Y, Park M. Effects of stroke rehabilitation using gait robot-assisted training and person-centered goal setting: a single blinded pilot study. Healthc Basel Switz 2023; 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040588
Haolin T, Yuanbin Y, Hu Z, Wenjing Z, Jing Z, Jingfeng T, et al. Efficacy of Daoyin combined with lower limb robot as a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Tradit Chin Med Chung Tsa Chih Ying Wen Pan 2024; 44: 530-536.
Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 5-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308326632
Hirano S, Saitoh E, Imoto D, Ii T, Tsunoda T, Otaka Y. Effects of robot-assisted gait training using the Welwalk on gait independence for individuals with hemiparetic stroke: an assessor-blinded, multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2024; 21: 76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01370-5
Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Demott T, Moore JL, Roth HR. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke 2008;39: 1786-1792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.504779
House G, Burdea G, Polistico K, Grampurohit N, Roll D, Damiani F, et al. A rehabilitation first tournament between teams of nursing home residents with chronic stroke. GAMES Health J 2016; 5: 75-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2015.0072
House G, Burdea G, Polistico K, Roll D, Kim J, Grampurohit N, et al. Integrative rehabilitation of residents chronic post-stroke in skilled nursing facilities: the design and evaluation of the BrightArm Duo. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2016; 11: 683-694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2015.1068384
Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Wang WE, Lin K, Chang K, Chen C, et al. Bilateral robotic priming before task-oriented approach in subacute stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2017; 31: 225-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215516633275
Hung C, Hsieh Y, Wu C, Lin Y, Lin K, Chen C. The effects of combination of robot-assisted therapy with task-specific or impairment-oriented training on motor function and quality of life in chronic stroke. PM R 2016; 8: 721-729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.01.008
Inoue S, Otaka Y, Kumagai M, Sugasawa M, Mori N, Kondo K. Effects of Balance Exercise Assist Robot training for patients with hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2022; 19: 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-00989-6
Jeon SY, Ki M, Shin JH. Resistive versus active assisted robotic training for the upper limb after a stroke: a randomized controlled study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2024; 67:101789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101789
Kayabinar E, Özalp M, Koçyigit M, As I, Elbasan B. The effects of robotic and conventional gait training in addition to neurodevelopmental treatment on balance, mobility, and health-related quality of life in patients with stroke. Neurol Sci Neurophysiol 2019; 36: 112-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/NSN.2019.10027
Kayabinar B, Alemdaroğlu-Gürbüz İ, Yilmaz Ö. The effects of virtual reality augmented robot-assisted gait training on dual-task performance and functional measures in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled single-blind trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 57: 227-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06441-8
Kim G, Won Y, Seo J, Ko M. Effects of newly developed compact robot-aided upper extremity training system (Neuro-X®) in patients with stroke: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med 2018; 50: 607-612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2361
Kim J, Ko M, Park J, Lee HJ, Nam KY, Nam Y, et al. Efficacy of electromechanically assisted rehabilitation of upper limb function in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled study. J Rehabil Med Clin Commun 2021; 4: 1000074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/20030711-1000074
Kim Y, Park C, Yoon B, You J. Bolstering cognitive and locomotor function in post-stroke dementia using human-robotic interactive gait training. J Clin Med 2023; 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175661
Lamberti N, Manfredini F, Lissom L, Lavezzi S, Basaglia N, Straudi S. Beneficial effects of robot-assisted gait training on functional recovery in women after stroke: a cohort study. Med-Lith 2021; 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57111200
Leblebicier M, Saracoglu I, Yaman F, Sahin E. Effect of robot-assisted gait training on quality of life and depression in patients with hemiplegia. Ann Clin Anal Med 2021; 12: 108-1092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4328/ACAM.20605
Lee SH, Park G, Cho DY, Kim HY, Lee J, Kim S, et al. Comparisons between endeffector and exoskeleton rehabilitation robots regarding upper extremity function among chronic stroke patients with moderate-to-severe upper limb impairment. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 1806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58630-2
Lee K, Park G, Shin J. Differences in dual task performance after robotic upper extremity rehabilitation in hemiplegic stroke patients. Front Neurol 2021; 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.771185
Lee YH, Ko LW, Hsu CY, Cheng YY. Therapeutic effects of robotic-exoskeleton-assisted gait rehabilitation and predictive factors of significant improvements in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Bioeng Basel Switz 2023; 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10050585
Leem M, Kim G, Kim K, Yi T, Moon H. Predictors of functional and motor outcomes following upper limb robotassisted therapy after stroke. Int J Rehabil Res 2019; 42:223-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000349
Linder SM, Rosenfeldt AB, Bay RC, Sahu K, Wolf SL, Alberts JL. Improving quality of life and depression after stroke through telerehabilitation. Am J Occup Ther Off Publ Am Occup Ther Assoc 2015; 69:6902290020p1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2015.014498
Louie DR, Mortenson WB, Durocher M, Schneeberg A, Teasell R, Yao J, et al. Efficacy of an exoskeleton-based physical therapy program for nonambulatory patients during subacute stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2021; 18: 149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00942-z
Lyukmanov RK, Aziatskaya GA, Mokienko OA, Varako NA, Kovyazina MS, Suponeva NA, et al. Brain-computer interfaces in poststroke rehabilitation: a clinical neuropsychological study. Neurosci Behav Physiol 2019;49: 1038-1046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-019-00835-8
Ma HI, Hung PH, Lin SH, Chuang IC, Wu CY. Role of selfefficacy in the predictive relationship of motor ability to functional performance after task-related training in stroke: a secondary analysis of longitudinal data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2021; 102: 1588-1594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.017
Maggio MG, Naro A, Manuli A, Maresca G, Balletta T, Latella D, et al. Effects of robotic neurorehabilitation on body representation in individuals with stroke: a preliminary study focusing on an EEGbased approach. Brain Topogr 2021; 34: 348-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-021-00825-5
Maki Y, Ii T, Yamada M, Tanabe S. Factors affecting the efficiency of walking independence in patients with subacute stroke following robot-assisted gait training with conventional rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res 2024; 47: 26-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000609
Manuli A, Maggio MG, Latella D, Cannavò A, Balletta T, De Luca R, et al. Can robotic gait rehabilitation plus Virtual Reality affect cognitive and behavioural outcomes in patients with chronic stroke? A randomized controlled trial involving three different protocols. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Off J Natl Stroke Assoc 2020; 29: 104994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104994
Manuli A, Maggio M, Stagnitti M, Aliberti R, Cannavò A, Casella C, et al. Is intensive gait training feasible and effective at old age? A retrospective case-control study on the use of Lokomat Free-D in patients with chronic stroke. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 92:159-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2021.08.013
Meng G, Ma X, Chen P, Xu S, Li M, Zhao Y, et al. Effect of early integrated robot-assisted gait training on motor and balance in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2022; 15:17562864221123195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864221123195
Milani G, Mantovani L, Baroni A, Lamberti N, Basaglia N, Lavezzi S, et al. Variations in health-related quality of life after stroke: insights from a clinical trial on arm rehabilitation with a long-term follow-up. Adv Rehabil Sci Pract. Published online November 29, 2023:1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351231214845
Mustafaoglu R, Erhan B, Yeldan I, Gunduz B, Tarakci E. Does robot-assisted gait training improve mobility, activities of daily living and quality of life in stroke? A singleblinded, randomized controlled trial. Acta Neurol Belg 2020; 120: 335-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-020-01276-8
Nijenhuis S, Prange G, Amirabdollahian F, Sale P, Infarinato F, Nasr N, et al. Feasibility study into self-administered training at home using an arm and hand device with motivational gaming environment in chronic stroke. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2015; 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0080-y
Norouzi-Gheidari N, Archambault PS, Monte-Silva K, Kairy D, Sveistrup H, Trivino M, et al. Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a combined virtual reality, robotics and electrical stimulation intervention in upper extremity stroke rehabilitation. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2021; 18: 61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00851-1
Ogino T, Kanata Y, Uegaki R, Yamaguchi T, Morisaki K, Nakano S, et al. Effects of gait exercise assist robot (GEAR) on subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Off J Natl Stroke Assoc 2020; 29: 104886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104886
Page SJ, Hill V, White S. Portable upper extremity robotics is as efficacious as upper extremity rehabilitative therapy: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Rehabil 2013; 27:494-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215512464795
Park JH, Park G, Kim HY, Lee J, Ham Y, Hwang D, et al. A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2020; 17: 137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00763-6
Park C, Oh-Park M, Dohle C, Bialek A, Friel K, Edwards D, et al. Effects of innovative hip-knee-ankle interlimb coordinated robot training on ambulation, cardiopulmonary function, depression, and fall confidence in acute hemiplegia. NeuroRehabilitation 2020; 46: 577-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-203086
Quinlan E, Dodakian L, See J, McKenzie A, Le V, Wojnowicz M, et al. Neural function, injury, and stroke subtype predict treatment gains after stroke. Ann Neurol 2015; 77: 132-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24309
Ranzani R, Lambercy O, Metzger JC, Califfi A, Regazzi S, Dinacci D, et al. Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2020; 17: 115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00746-7
Rodgers H, Bosomworth H, Krebs HI, van Wijck F, Howel D, Wilson N, et al. Robot-assisted training compared with an enhanced upper limb therapy programme and with usual care for upper limb functional limitation after stroke: the RATULS three-group RCT. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl 2020; 24: 1-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24540
Rodríguez-Pérez MP, Sánchez-Herrera-Baeza P, Cano-dela-Cuerda R, Camacho-Montaño LR, Serrada-Tejeda S, Pérez-de-Heredia-Torres M. Effects of intensive vibratory treatment with a robotic system on the recovery of sensation and function in patients with subacute and chronic stroke: a non-randomized clinical trial. J Clin Med 2022;11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133572
Siotto M, Germanotta M, Santoro M, Cipollini V, Guardati G, Papadopoulou D, et al. Serotonin levels and cognitive recovery in patients with subacute stroke after rehabilitation treatment. Brain Sci 2021; 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11050642
Stolz R, Nayyar R, Louie J, Bower K, Paul S, Ng L. The effectiveness of a novel cable-driven gait trainer (Robowalk) combined with conventional physiotherapy compared to conventional physiotherapy alone following stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Rehabil Res Int Z Rehabil Rev Int Rech Readaptation 2019; 42: 377-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000375
Takebayashi T, Takahashi K, Amano S, et al. Robot-assisted training as self-training for upper-limb hemiplegia in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2022;53: 2182-2191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037260
Taki S, Imura T, Iwamoto Y, Gosho M, Sakai M, Hashimoto K, et al. Effects of exoskeletal lower limb robot training on the activities of daily living in stroke patients: retrospective pre-post comparison using propensity score matched analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2020; 29: 105176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105176
Taki S, Imura T, Mitsutake T, Iwamoto Y, Tanaka R, Imada N, et al. Identifying the characteristics of patients with stroke who have difficulty benefiting from gait training with the hybrid assistive limb: a retrospective cohort study. Front Neurorobot 2024; 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2024.1336812
Taravati S, Capaci K, Uzumcugil H, Tanigor G. Evaluation of an upper limb robotic rehabilitation program on motor functions, quality of life, cognition, and emotional status in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled study. Neurol Sci Off J Ital Neurol Soc Ital Soc Clin Neurophysiol 2022;43: 1177-1188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05431-8
Timmermans AAA, Lemmens RJM, Monfrance M, Geers RPJ, Bakx W, Smeets RJEM, et al. Effects of task-oriented robot training on arm function, activity, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2014; 11: 45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-45
Torrisi M, De Cola MC, Buda A, Carioti L, Scaltrito MV, Bramanti P, et al. Self-efficacy, poststroke depression, and rehabilitation outcomes: is there a correlation? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2018;27: 3208-3211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.07.021
Torrisi M, Maggio M, De Cola M, Zichittella C, Carmela C, Porcari B, et al. Beyond motor recovery after stroke: the role of hand robotic rehabilitation plus virtual reality in improving cognitive function. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 92: 11-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2021.07.053
Uivarosan D, Tit D, Iovan C, Nistor-Cseppento DC, Endres L, Lazar L, et al. Effects of combining modern recovery techniques with neurotrophic medication and standard treatment in stroke patients. Sci Total Environ 2019; 679: 80-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.070
van Nunen MPM, Gerrits KHL, Konijnenbelt M, Janssen TWJ, de Haan A. Recovery of walking ability using a robotic device in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2015; 10:141-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2013.873489
Volpe B, Krebs H, Hogan N, Edelstein L, Diels C, Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 2000; 54:1938-1944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.54.10.1938
Vostrý M, Fischer S, Cmorej PC, Nesvadba M, Peran D, Šín R. Combined therapy for patients after ischemic stroke as a support of social adaptability. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2019; 40: 329-332.
Vostry M, Zilcher L. Combined therapy for patients after ischemic stroke from the point of view of comprehensive rehabilitation. J Educ Cult Soc 2020; 11: 119-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2020.1.119.125
Wall A, Borg J, Palmcrantz S. Self-perceived functioning and disability after randomized conventional and electromechanically-assisted gait training in subacute stroke: a 6 months follow-up. NeuroRehabil 2019; 45:501-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-192929
Wu M, Landry JM, Kim J, Schmit BD, Yen SC, Macdonald J. Robotic resistance/assistance training improves locomotor function in individuals poststroke: a randomized controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95:799-806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.12.021
Wu C-y, Yang C-l, Chuang L-l, Lin KC, Chen HC, Chenet MD, al. Effect of therapist-based versus robot-assisted bilateral arm training on motor control, functional performance, and quality of life after chronic stroke: a clinical trial. Phys Ther 2012;92: 1006-1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20110282
Xie L, Yoon BH, Park C, You J (Sung) H. Optimal intervention timing for robotic-assisted gait training in hemiplegic stroke. Brain Sci 2022; 12: 1058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12081058
Yaksi E, Bahadir E, Yasar M, Alisik T, Kurul R, Demirel A. The effect of robot-assisted gait training frequency on walking, functional recovery, and quality of life in patients with stroke. ACTA Neurol Belg 2023; 123: 583-590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-023-02194-1
Yildiz A, Ahmed I, Mustafaoglu R, Kesiktas FN. Effects of robot-assisted arm training on respiratory muscle strength, activities of daily living, and quality of life in patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Physiother Theory Pract. Published online January 2, 2024: 1-9.
Zengin-Metli D, Özbudak-Demir S, Eraktaş İ, Binay-Safer V, Ekiz T. Effects of robot assistive upper extremity rehabilitation on motor and cognitive recovery, the quality of life, and activities of daily living in stroke patients. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2018; 31: 1059-1064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-171015
Zhao C, Ju F, Sun W, Jiang S, Xi X, Wang H, et al. Effects of training with a brain computer interface-controlled robot on rehabilitation outcome in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurol Ther 2022; 11: 679-695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-022-00333-z
Feigin VL, Owolabi MO, World Stroke Organization-Lancet Neurology Commission Stroke Collaboration Group. Pragmatic solutions to reduce the global burden of stroke: a World Stroke Organization-Lancet Neurology Commission. Lancet Neurol 2023; 22: 1160-1206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00277-6
Feigin VL, Stark BA, Johnson CO, Roth GA, Bisignano C, Abady GG, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol 2021; 20:795-820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0
McCambridge AB, Elkins MR. If we can’t see race and ethnicity in research, how will we see racial inequality? J Physiother 2021; 67: 82-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2021.02.016
Lang CE, Lohse KR, Birkenmeier RL. Dose and timing in neurorehabilitation: prescribing motor therapy after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 2015; 28: 549-555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000256
Donnellan-Fernandez K, Ioakim A, Hordacre B. Revisiting dose and intensity of training: opportunities to enhance recovery following stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2022; 31: 106789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106789
Lauenroth A, Ioannidis AE, Teichmann B. Influence of combined physical and cognitive training on cognition: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2016; 16: 141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0315-1
Arya KN, Pandian S, Verma R, Garg RK. Movement therapy induced neural reorganization and motor recovery in stroke: a review. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2011; 15:528-537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2011.01.023
Bressi F, Cricenti L, Campagnola B, Bravi M, Miccinilli S, Santacaterina F, et al. Effects of robotic upper limb treatment after stroke on cognitive patterns: a systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation 2022; 51:541-558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-220149
Yuan F, Klavon E, Liu Z, Lopez RP, Zhao X. A systematic review of robotic rehabilitation for cognitive training. Front Robot AI 2021; 8: 605715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.605715
Zanatta F, Steca P, Fundarò C, Giardini A, Felicetti G, Panigazzi M, et al. Biopsychosocial effects and experience of use of robotic and virtual reality devices in neuromotor rehabilitation: s study protocol. PLoS One 2023; 18: e0282925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282925
Lexell J, Brogårdh C. The use of ICF in the neurorehabilitation process. Brogårdh C, Lexell J, eds. NeuroRehabilitation 2015; 36: 5-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-141184
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Francesco Zanatta, Alessandra Gorini, Luca Fiorentino, Silvia Traversoni, Cira Fundarò, Marco D'Addario, Patrizia Steca
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
