Occupational performance priorities and outcomes in long-term transitional rehabilitation for young adults with acquired brain injury
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.45144Keywords:
rehabilitation, acquired brain injury, comprehensive rehabilitation, young adults, Canadian Occupation Performance Measure (COPM), Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended interview (GOSE)Abstract
Background: In a new long-term transitional rehabilitation service following acquired brain injury, occupational performance problems are analysed.
Aim: The objective was to describe these problems and the participants’ prioritization, and also to describe the changes between admission and discharge. Another objective was to describe changes in assessed independence-related disability.
Design: Observational clinical study.
Patients: Young adults (18–25 years), (n = 46), who had earlier undergone traditional medical rehabilitation following acquired brain injury.
Methods: The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was used on both admission and discharge. Independence-related general disability was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended (GOSE).
Results: Patients identified 122 occupational performance problems as important. Most problems were in socialization (3/7), community activities (1/3), and finding paid or unpaid work (1/4).
Self-rated levels of performance and satisfaction in COPM were significantly higher on discharge compared with admission. The range of GOSE scores increased from 4–6 to 4–8 between admission and discharge.
Conclusion: Young adults with acquired brain injury tend to prioritize rehabilitation goals to reduce difficulties in establishing relationships and/or in professional life. On discharge, ratings of implementation and satisfaction of performance were distinctly elevated, while assessed global disability was decreased.
Clinical rehabilitation impact: The results highlight the need for transitional rehabilitation for patient-centred remediating measures.
Downloads
References
Sawyer SM, Azzopardi PS, Wickremarathne D, Patton GC. The age of adolescence. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2018; 2: 223–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1
Gilmore N, Mirman D, Kiran S. Young Adults with acquired brain injury show longitudinal improvements in cognition after intensive cognitive rehabilitation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2022; 65: 1494–1520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00324
Worm MS, Kruse M, Valentin JB, Svendsen SW, Nielsen JF, Thomsen JF, et al. Acquired brain injury among adolescents and young adults: a nationwide study of labor market attachment. J Occup Rehabil 2023; 33: 592–601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-023-10097-4
Todis B, Glang A, Bullis M, Ettel D, Hood D. Longitudinal investigation of the post-high school transition experiences of adolescents with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2011; 26: 138–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181e5a87a
Keetley R, Radford K, Manning JC. A scoping review of the needs of children and young people with acquired brain injuries and their families. Brain Inj 2019; 33: 1117–1128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2019.1637542
Keetley R, Manning JC, Williams J, Bennett E, Westlake M, Radford K. Understanding barriers and facilitators to long-term participation needs in children and young people following acquired brain injuries: a qualitative multi-stakeholder study. Brain Impair 2024; 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/IB23100
Young NL, Barden WS, Mills WA, Burke TA, Law M, Boydell K. Transition to adult-oriented health care: perspectives of youth and adults with complex physical disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2009; 29: 345–361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/01942630903245994
van Markus-Doornbosch F, van der Holst M, de Kloet AJ, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Meesters JJL. Fatigue, participation and quality of life in adolescents and young adults with acquired brain injury in an outpatient rehabilitation cohort. Dev Neurorehabil 2020; 23: 328–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2019.1692948
Leonard R, Linden MA, Holloway M. Case management for acquired brain injury: a systematic review of the evidence base. Brain Inj 2025; 39: 337–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2438785
McKinlay A, Linden M, DePompei R, Aaro Jonsson C, Anderson V, Braga L, et al. Service provision for children and young people with acquired brain injury: Practice recommendations. Brain Inj 2016; 30: 1656–1664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2016.1201592
Botchway-Commey E, Muscara F, Greenham M, D’Cruz K, Bonyhady B, Anderson V, et al. Rehabilitation models of care for children and youth with traumatic brain and/or spinal cord injuries: a focus on service structure, service organization, and the barriers and facilitators of rehabilitation service provision. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2023; 33: 1697–1727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2022.2147196
Enemark Larsen A, Rasmussen B, Christensen JR. Enhancing a client-centred practice with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Occup Ther Int 2018; 2018: 5956301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5956301
Donnelly C, Eng JJ, Hall J, Alford L, Giachino R, Norton K, et al. Client-centred assessment and the identification of meaningful treatment goals for individuals with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 302–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101589
Kirsh B, Cockburn L. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a tool for recovery-based practice. Psychiatr Rehabil J 2009; 32: 171–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2975/32.3.2009.171.176
Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 5th ed. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2014.
Cicerone KD, Goldin Y, Ganci K, Rosenbaum A, Wethe JV, Langenbahn DM, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: systematic review of the literature from 2009 through 2014. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2019; 100: 1515–1533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.02.011
Cicerone K, Dams-O’Connor K, Eberle R, Fraas M, Ganci K, Langenbahn D, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation manual and textbook: translating evidence-based recommendations into practice. 2nd ed. Reston: ACRM Publishing; 2022.
Polatajko HJ, Mandich AD, Miller LT, Macnab JJ. Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP): part II – the evidence. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2001; 20: 83–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J006v20n02_06
Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther 2004; 71: 210–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740407100406
Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Effectiveness of an attention-training program. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1987; 9: 117–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638708405352
Wilson L, Boase K, Nelson LD, Temkin NR, Giacino JT, Markowitz AJ, et al. A Manual for the Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended Interview. J Neurotrauma 2021; 38: 2435–2446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2020.7527
Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975; 1: 480–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(75)92830-5
Ohno K, Tomori K, Sawada T, Kobayashi R. Examining minimal important change of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for subacute rehabilitation hospital inpatients. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2021; 5: 133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00405-y
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
Keptner KM, Rogers R. Competence and satisfaction in occupational performance among a sample of university students: an exploratory study. OTJR (Thorofare N J) 2019; 39: 204–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449218813702
Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Pediatric brain injury: social, behavioral, and communication disability. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2007; 18: 133–144, vii. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2006.11.007
Plach HL, Sells CH. Occupational performance needs of young veterans. Am J Occup Ther 2013; 67: 73–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2013.003871
Verhoef JA, Roebroeck ME, van Schaardenburgh N, Floothuis MC, Miedema HS. Improved occupational performance of young adults with a physical disability after a vocational rehabilitation intervention. J Occup Rehabil 2014; 24: 42–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9446-9
Lindsay S, Stoica A. A systematic review of factors affecting driving and public transportation among youth and young adults with acquired brain injury. Brain Inj 2017; 31: 1257–1269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1321140
Enemark Larsen A, Wehberg S, Christensen JR. Looking into the content of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM): a Danish cross-sectional study. Occup Ther Int 2020; 2020: 9573950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9573950
Bonn MM, Dickey JP, Moran B, McGuire S, Graham L. Completing an interdisciplinary outpatient intervention improves patient rehabilitation goals following a mild traumatic brain injury. Physiother Theory Pract 2023; 39: 310–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2021.2022046
Lebrault H, Martini R, Manolov R, Chavanne C, Krasny-Pacini A, Chevignard M. Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance to improve occupational performance goals for children with executive function deficits after acquired brain injury. Dev Med Child Neurol 2024; 66: 501–513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15759
Wagman P, Håkansson C. Exploring occupational balance in adults in Sweden. Scand J Occup Ther 2014; 21: 415–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2014.934917
Leufstadius C, Erlandsson LK, Eklund M. Time use and daily activities in people with persistent mental illness. Occup Ther Int 2006; 13: 123–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.207
Håkansson C, Lissner L, Björkelund C, Sonn U. Engagement in patterns of daily occupations and perceived health among women of working age. Scand J Occup Ther 2009; 16: 110–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11038120802572494
Eklund M, Leufstadius C, Bejerholm U. Time use among people with psychiatric disabilities: implications for practice. Psychiatr Rehabil J 2009; 32: 177–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2975/32.3.2009.177.191
COPM The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. COPM responsiveness and clinically important change. [cited 2026 17 April] Available from: https://www.thecopm.ca/casestudy/responsiveness-of-the-copm/
Roe C, Skandsen T, Anke A, Ader T, Vik A, Lund SB, et al. Severe traumatic brain injury in Norway: impact of age on outcome. J Rehabil Med 2013; 45: 734–740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1198
Worm MS, Valentin JB, Johnsen SP, Nielsen JF, Forchhammer HB, Svendsen SW. Predictors of disability in adolescents and young adults with acquired brain injury after the acute phase. Brain Inj 2021; 35: 893–901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2021.1927183
Norup A, Svendsen SW, Doser K, Ryttersgaard TO, Frandsen N, Gade L, et al. Prevalence and severity of fatigue in adolescents and young adults with acquired brain injury: a nationwide study. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2019; 29: 1113–1128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2017.1371045
Pantelatos RI, Stenberg J, Follestad T, Sandrød O, Einarsen CE, Vik A, et al. Improvement in functional outcome from 6 to 12 months after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury is frequent, but may not be detected with the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended. Neurotrauma Rep 2024; 5: 139–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2023.0109
Zuckerman DA, Giacino JT, Bodien YG. Traumatic brain injury: what is a favorable outcome? J Neurotrauma 2022; 39: 1010–1012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2021.0356
Dikmen S, Machamer J, Miller B, Doctor J, Temkin N. Functional status examination: a new instrument for assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2001; 18: 127–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/08977150150502578
Nelson LD, Magnus BE, Temkin NR, Dikmen S, Manley GT, Balsis S. How do scores on the functional status examination (FSE) correspond to scores on the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)? Neurotrauma Rep 2022; 3: 122–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2021.0057
Green L, Godfrey C, Soo C, Anderson V, Catroppa C. A preliminary investigation into psychosocial outcome and quality-of-life in adolescents following childhood traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2013; 27: 872–877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2013.775506
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Charlotte Heurlin, Marie-Louise Schult, Aniko Barfai, Annelie Rosén, Jan Ekholm, Monika Löfgren
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
