Neuropsychological consequences three years post-covid-19 are persistent and have great impact on everyday activities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.45473Keywords:
post-COVID-19 condition, cognitive dysfunction, fatigue, neuropsychological assessment, long-term outcomes, rehabilitationAbstract
Objective: Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) is associated with persistent cognitive dysfunction and fatigue, but limited evidence is available regarding long-term outcomes beyond one year.
Design: Longitudinal follow-up assessment.
Patients: Patients who had been previously hospitalized or treated in primary care after COVID-19 infection.
Methods: Cognitive performance (WAIS-III subtests, Rey Complex Figure, RAVLT, and D2 Test of Attention) and fatigue (MFI-20 and MFS) were examined in 82 participants at 18 months post-infection; 59 of these participants were reassessed at 36 months. Activity limitations were evaluated using structured interviews.
Results: At 18 months, the scores on most cognitive tests were significantly below expected premorbid levels (mean differences: 7–17 T-points). At 36 months, deficits persisted in most domains, with only WAIS Matrices and D2 KL showing modest improvement (Cohen’s d: ~0.4). Fatigue remained high across all dimensions of MFI-20, and 75–78% of patients exceeding the mental fatigue cut-off of MFS. Self-reported cognitive impact and activity limitations showed minimal change over time.
Conclusions: Post-COVID-19 cognitive dysfunction and fatigue remain prevalent for up to three years post-infection, particularly affecting attention, processing speed, and working memory. These deficits pose substantial barriers to daily functioning and return to work, highlighting the need for targeted rehabilitation strategies.
Downloads
References
Invernizzi A, Renzetti S, van Thriel C, Rechtman E, Patrono A, Ambrosi C, et al. COVID-19 related cognitive, structural and functional brain changes among Italian adolescents and young adults: a multimodal longitudinal case-control study. Transl Psychiatry 2024; 14: 402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-03108-2
Fanshawe JB, Sargent BF, Badenoch JB, Saini A, Watson CJ, Pokrovskaya A, et al. Cognitive domains affected post-COVID-19 a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol 2024: e16181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.16181
Chen C, Haupert SR, Zimmermann L, Shi X, Fritsche LG, Mukherjee B. Global prevalence of post COVID-19 condition or long COVID: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Infect Dis 2022; 226: 1593–1607.
Steinmetz A, Gross S, Lehnert K, Lücker P, Friedrich N, Nauck M, et al. Longitudinal clinical features of Post-COVID-19 patients: symptoms, fatigue and physical function at 3- and 6-month follow-up. J Clin Med 2023; 12: 3966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12123966
Soriano JB, Murthy S, Marshall JC, Relan P, Diaz JV. A clinical case definition of post-COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus. Lancet Infect Dis 2022; 22(4): e102–e7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00703-9
Villar JC, Gumisiriza N, Abreu LG, Maude RJ, Colebunders R. Defining post-COVID condition. Lancet Infect Dis 2022; 22(3): 316–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00060-3
Bygdell M, Leach S, Lundberg L, Gyll D, Martikainen J, Santosa A, et al. A comprehensive characterization of patients diagnosed with post-COVID-19 condition in Sweden 16 months after the introduction of the International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision diagnosis code (U09.9): a populat-ion-based cohort study. Int J Infect Dis 2023; 126: 104–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.11.021
Daugherty SE, Guo Y, Heath K, Dasmariñas MC, Jubilo KG, Samranvedhya J, et al. Risk of clinical sequelae after the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 in-fection: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2021; 373: n1098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1098
Augustin M, Schommers P, Stecher M, Dewald F, Gieselmann L, Gruell H, et al. Post-COVID syndrome in non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a longitudinal prospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2021; 6: 100122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100122
Tudorache Pantazi MA, Gadea-Domenech M, Espert Tortajada R. Cognition and long COVID: a PRISMA systematic review of longitudinal studies. Rev Neurol 2025; 79: 37385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31083/RN37385
Yeung SP, Guo P, Adlard FL, Zhang SR, Bhagat V, Cho J, et al. COVCOG 3-trajectory of long COVID: longitudinal changes in symptoms and cognitive impairment. A third publication From the COVID and Cognition Study. Appl Cogn Psychol 2025; 39: e70040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70040
Cataldo SA, Micciulli A, Margulis L, Cibeyra M, Defeo S, Horovitz SG, et al. Cognitive impact and brain structural changes in long COVID patients: a cross-sectional MRI study two years post infection in a cohort from Argentina. BMC Neurol 2024; 24: 450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03959-8
Wahlgren C, Forsberg G, Divanoglou A, Östholm Balkhed Å, Niward K, Berg S, et al. Two-year follow-up of patients with post-COVID-19 condition in Sweden: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2023; 28: 100595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100595
Becker JH, Li J, Lin JJ, Federman A, Bagiella E, Kale MS, et al. Neurocognitive trajectories in long COVID: dvidence from longitudinal analyses. Brain Behav Immun - Health 2025; 48: 101093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbih.2025.101093
Wechsler D. The measurement of adult intelligence. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10020-000
Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale - revised. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1981.
Meyers JE, Meyers KR. Rey Complex Figure Test under four different administration procedures. Clin Neuropsychol 1995; 9: 63–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13854049508402059
Dunerfeldt M, Elmund A, Söderström B. Assessment Instruments in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in Stockholm: Development and Evaluation Unit, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Stockholm, County Council; 2010.
Ross RM. The D2 Test of Attention: an examination of age, gender, and cross-cultural indices. Dissertation. Argosy University; 2005.
Geffen G, Moar KJ, O’Hanlon A P, Clark CR, Geffen LB. Performance measures of 16- to 86-year-old males and females on the auditory verbal learning test. Clin Neuropsychol 1990; 4: 45–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13854049008401496
Ericsson A, Mannerkorpi K. Assessment of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain: reliability and validity of the Swedish ver-sion of the MFI-20. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1665–1670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280601055782
Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JC. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res 1995; 39: 315–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(94)00125-O
Johansson B, Starmark A, Berglund P, Rödholm M, Rönnbäck L. A self-assessment questionnaire for mental fatigue and related symptoms after neuro-logical disorders and injuries. Brain Inj 2010; 24: 2–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02699050903452961
Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, FitzGerald P, Parkes KR. The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Br J Clin Psychol 1982; 21: 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1982.tb01421.x
Green REA, Brenda M, Bruce C, Le-Anh N, Georges M, Bradbury C. Measuring premorbid IQ in traumatic brain injury: an examination of the validity of the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR). J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2008; 30: 163–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390701300524
Russell EW. Fluid and crystallized intelligence: effects of diffuse brain damage on the WAIS. Percept Mot Skills 1980; 51: 121–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1980.51.1.121
Ganzach Y. Antecedents of interest and the investment of fluid intelligence in the formation of crystalized intelligence. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 679504.
Cattell RB. The measurement of adult intelligence. Psychol Bull 1943; 40: 153–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059973
Bright P, van der Linde I. Comparison of methods for estimating premorbid intelligence. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2020; 30: 1–14.
Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 4th ed. San Antonio: Pearson Assessment; 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t15169-000
Öhlén H, Santos Tavares Silva I, Gustafsson M, Jarl S, Björkdahl A. Persistent obstacles for return to work after COVID-19 infection: an explorative follow-up study in Sweden. Front Rehabil Sci 2025; 6: 1628490. eCollection 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1628490
Björkdahl A, Gustafsson M, Öhlén H, Jarl S, Santos Tavares Silva I. Exploring the impact of cognitive dysfunction, fatigue, and shortness of breath on activities of daily life after COVID-19 infection, until 1-year follow-up. J Rehabil Med 2024; 56: jrm35403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.35403
Megari K, Thomaidou E, Chatzidimitriou E. Highlighting the neuropsychological consequences of COVID-19: evidence from a narrative review. INQUIRY 2024; 61: 00469580241262442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580241262442
Chen C, Haupert SR, Zimmermann L, Shi X, Fritsche LG, Mukherjee B. Global prevalence of post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) condition or long COVID: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Infect Dis 2022; 226: 1593–1607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiac136
Wahlgren C, Divanoglou A, Larsson M, Nilsson E, Ostholm Balkhed A, Niward K, et al. Rehabilitation needs following COVID-19: five-month post-discharge clinical follow-up of individuals with concerning self-reported symptoms. EClinicalMedicine 2022; 43: 101219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101219
Braga LW, Oliveira SB, Moreira AS, Martins Pereira MEMdS, Serio ASS, Carneiro VdS, et al. Long COVID neuropsychological follow-up: is cognitive rehabilitation relevant? NeuroRehabilitation 2023; 53: 517–534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-230212
Bright P, van der Linde I. Comparison of methods for estimating premorbid intelligence. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2020; 30: 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2018.1445650
Ganzach Y. Antecedents of interest and the investment of fluid intelligence in the formation of crystalized intelligence. Front Psychol 2021; 12 679504. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679504. eCollection 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679504
Iverson GL, Karr JE. Improving the methodology for identifying mild cognitive impairment in intellectually high-functioning adults using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery. Front Psychol 2021; 724888. eCollection 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724888
Brooks BL, Holdnack JA, Iverson GL. Advanced clinical interpretation of the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV: prevalence of low scores varies by level of intelli-gence and years of education. Assessment 2011; 18: 156–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110385316
Aderinto N, Olatunji G, Kokori E, Ogieuhi IJ, Yusuf IA, Egbunu E, et al. COVID-19 and cognitive impairment: a review of the emerging evidence. Discov Ment Health 2025; 5: 56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-025-00189-3
Joseph R, Rabelo L, Do Nascimento EB. Evidence of impaired processing speed and cognitive control in recovered COVID-19 patients: the role of cogni-tive slowing in long COVID memory impairment. Appl Neuropsychol Adult 2026: 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2026.2649334
Calabria M, García-Sánchez C, Grunden N, Pons C, Arroyo JA, Gómez-Anson B, et al. Post-COVID-19 fatigue: the contribution of cognitive and neuropsy-chiatric symptoms. J Neurol 2022 269: 3990-3999. Epub 2022 Apr 30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11141-8
Tanashyan MM, Kuznetsova PI, Morozova SN, Annushkin VA, Raskurazhev AA. Neuroimaging correlates of Post-COVID-19 symptoms: a functional MRI approach. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14: 2180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192180
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ann Björkdahl, Jerry Larsson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
