The Combined Use of Non-Invasive Neurostimulation with Interactive Digital Technologies in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.45747Keywords:
Electric stimulation, Exergaming, Recovery of function, Virtual reality, Electric stimulation therapyAbstract
Objective: To map the empirical evidence regarding the combined use of non-invasive neurostimulation with interactive digital technologies in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.
Design: Scoping review.
Methods: Seven databases facilitated a systematic, 3-block search. Additional searches were performed in Google Scholar, PEDro, and via forward and backward snowballing. Studies were required to report original, clinical data from individuals with spinal cord injury participating in interventions that combine non-invasive neurostimulation with interactive digital technologies. Screening and data extraction were performed by 2 independent reviewers according to pre-specified criteria.
Results: A total of 494 unique records were identified via the database searches, in addition to the 34 unique records identified via additional searches. Twelve studies met the eligibility criteria. Eleven studies delivered peripheral neurostimulation (i.e., neuromuscular/functional electrical stimulation), and 1 study delivered spinal-directed neurostimulation (i.e., transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation). Interactive digital technologies ranged from manual interfaces controlling 2D avatars to immersive, autonomous closed-loop feedback systems.
Conclusion: The accumulated evidence suggests that combining non-invasive neurostimulation with interactive digital technologies may enhance task-specific motor recovery and engagement in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. However, the research area is characterized by a low evidentiary standard, prompting a need for higher-quality studies to establish long-term clinical viability.
Downloads
References
Dietz V, Fouad K. Restoration of sensorimotor functions after spinal cord injury. Brain 2014; 137: 654–667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt262
Krassioukov A. Autonomic function following cervical spinal cord injury. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2009; 169: 157–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2009.08.003
Kapadia NM, Zivanovic V, Furlan J, Craven BC, McGillivray C, Popovic MR. Functional electrical stimulation therapy for grasping in traumatic incom-plete spinal cord injury: randomized control trial. Artif Organs 2011; 35: 212–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01216.x
Mangold S, Keller T, Curt A, Dietz V. Transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation for grasping in subjects with cervical spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2005; 43: 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101644
Sharif H, Gammage K, Chun S, Ditor D. Effects of FES-ambulation training on locomotor function and health-related quality of life in individuals with spi-nal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2014; 20: 58–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2001-58
Megía García A, Serrano-Muñoz D, Taylor J, Avendaño-Coy J, Gómez-Soriano J. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and motor rehabilitation in spi-nal cord injury: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2020; 34: 3–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968319893298
Bersch I, Schafer K, Limacher A, Sonntag U, Baumberger M, Alberty M. The effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on bowel management in people with chronic spinal cord injury: an IDEAL 2a pilot study. Colorectal Disease 2025; 27: e70276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.70276
Parittotokkaporn S, Varghese C, O’Grady G, Svirskis D, Subramanian S, O’Carroll SJ. Non-invasive neuromodulation for bowel, bladder and sexual res-toration following spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020; 194: 105822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105822
Fang CY, Lien ASY, Tsai JL, Yang HC, Chan HL, Chen RS, et al. The effect and dose–response of functional electrical stimulation cycling training on spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Front Physiol 2021; 12: 756200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.756200
Suggitt J, Symonds J, D’Amico JM. Safety and effectiveness of multisite transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation combined with activity-based therapy when delivered in a community rehabilitation setting: a real-world pilot study. Neuromodulation 2025; 28: 1144–1156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2025.01.005
Hubbard IJ, Parsons MW, Neilson C, Carey LM. Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occup Ther Int 2009; 16: 175–189. DOI :10.1002/oti.275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.275
Jaramillo JP, Johanson ME, Kiratli BJ. Adherence and perceptions of a home sports video gaming program in persons with spinal cord injuries: a pilot study. J Spinal Cord Med 2025; 48: 272–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2268328
Scheffler MS, Martin CA, Dietz V, Faraji AH, Sayenko DG. Synergistic implications of combinatorial rehabilitation approaches using spinal stimulation on therapeutic outcomes in spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 165: 166–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2024.06.015
Sherman BC, Schmidt Read M, Hoh DJ, Guest JD, Lane MA, Zholudeva LV. Combining therapeutic strategies to treat the injured spinal cord: a transla-tional perspective. J Neurotrauma 2025; 42: 2129–2148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08977151251371710
Torres RD, Castillo C, Terson de Paleville D. Biofeedback using virtual reality and yoga pranayama modulates blood pressure and heart rate variability in people with and without cervical spinal cord injuries. Int J Yoga Therap 2025; 35: Article 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17761/2025-D-24-00080
Lakhani A, Martin K, Gray L, Mallison J, Grimbeek P, Hollins I, et al. What is the impact of engaging with natural environments delivered via virtual reali-ty on the psycho-emotional health of people with spinal cord injury receiving rehabilitation in hospital? Findings from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020; 101: 1532–1540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.05.013
Mat Rosly M, Mat Rosly H. Home-based exergaming training effects for two individuals with spinal cord injury: a case report. Physiother Theory Pract 2023; 39: 208–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2021.2001881
Minzatanu D, Roman NA, Manaila AI, Baseanu ICC, Tuchel VI, Basalic EB, et al. Virtual reality associated with functional electrical stimulation for upper extremity in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Appl Sci 2024; 14: 8248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188248
Cervera MA, Soekadar SR, Ushiba J, Millán J del R, Liu M,
Birbaumer N, et al. Brain–computer interfaces for post-stroke motor rehabilitation: a meta-analysis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2018; 5: 651–663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.544
Cassani R, Novak GS, Falk TH, Oliveira AA. Virtual reality and non-invasive brain stimulation for rehabilitation applications: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2020; 17: 147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00780-5
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169: 467-473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Google Scholar. 2026. Accessed March 18, 2026. https://www.scholar.google.com
Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Accessed March 18, 2026. https://www.pedro.org.au
Covidence systematic review software. 2026. Accessed March 18, 2026. https://www.covidence.org
Haddaway NR, Page MJ, Pritchard CC, McGuinness LA. PRISMA2020: an R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Syst Rev 2022; 18: e1230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
Houston DJ, Lee JW, Unger J, Masani K, Musselman KE. Functional electrical stimulation plus visual feedback balance training for standing balance per-formance among individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury: a case series. Front Neurol 2020; 11: 680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00680
Sayenko DG, Masani K, Milosevic M, Robinson MF, Vette AH, McConville KMV, et al. Video game-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation system for calf muscle training: a case study. Med Eng Phys 2011; 33: 249–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.10.010
Sayenko DG, Milosevic M, Masani K, Sanin EG, McConville KM, Popovic MR. Video game-based exercise for improvement of calf muscle properties: a case study. In Dössel O, Schlegel WC, editors. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7–12, 2009, Munich, Germany. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009, p. 580–583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03889-1_156
Kowalczewski J, Chong SL, Galea M, Prochazka A. In-home tele-rehabilitation improves tetraplegic hand function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 412–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968310394869
Zoulias ID, Armengol M, Poulton A, Andrews B, Gibbons R, Harwin WS, et al. Novel instrumented frame for standing exercising of users with complete spinal cord injuries. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 13003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49237-3
Duffell LD, Paddison S, Alahmary AF, Donaldson N, Burridge J. The effects of FES cycling combined with virtual reality racing biofeedback on voluntary function after incomplete SCI: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2019; 16: 149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0619-4
Massey S, Paddison S, Donaldson N, Airantzis D, Burridge J, Duffell L. Recovery of function through FES-assisted cycling therapy with virtual reality biofeedback in chronically spinal cord-injured people. Artif Organs 2025; 49: e14–15.
Hasnan N, Hamzaid NA, Magenthran V, Davis GM. Exercise responses during outdoor versus virtual reality indoor arm+FES-leg cycling in individuals with spinal cord injury. Games Health J 2024; 13: 207–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2023.0047
Pizzolato C, Palipana DB, Mulholland K, Quinn ARJ, Mannan MMN, Clanchy K, et al. Non-invasive digital twin controlled BCI-FES-VR leg-cycling ergome-ter intervention recovers sensorimotor function in individuals with complete spinal cord injury. In Pons JL, Tornero J, Akay M, editors. Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on NeuroRehabilitation V. Proceedings of the 64th International Conference on Neurorehabilitation (ICNR2024), No-vember 5-8, 2024, La Granja, Spain, Volume 2. La Granja: Springer; 2024. p. 63–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77584-0_13
Heidorn CE, Foglyano KM, Triolo RJ, Lombardo LM, Fu MJ. Exploring the integration of immersive virtual reality with adapted neuromuscular stimulation rowing for individuals with spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2026; 105: 456–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002938
Bayon-Calatayud M, Trincado-Alonso F, López-Larraz E, Montesano L, Pons JL, Gil-Agudo Á. Usability of the combination of brain–computer interface, functional electrical stimulation and virtual reality for improving hand function in spinal cord injured patients. In Ibáñez J, González-Vargas J, Azorín J, Akay M, Pons, J, editors. Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation II. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on NeuroRehabilitation (ICNR2016), October 18–-21, 2016, Segovia, Spain. Segovia: Springer; 2017. p. 331–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46669-9_56
Chu X, Liu S, Zhao X, Liu T, Xing Z, Li Q, et al. Case report: virtual reality-based arm and leg cycling combined with transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation for early treatment of a cervical spinal cord injured patient. Front Neurosci 2024; 18: 1380467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1380467
Osuagwu BCA, Wallace L, Fraser M, Vuckovic A. Rehabilitation of hand in subacute tetraplegic patients based on brain computer interface and functional electrical stimulation: a randomised pilot study. J Neural Eng 2016; 13: 065002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/13/6/065002
Broniera Junior P, Campos DP, Lazzaretti AE, Nohama P, Carvalho AA, Krueger E, et al. EEG-FES-Force-MMG closed-loop control systems of a volunteer with paraplegia considering motor imagery with fatigue recognition and automatic shut-off. Biomed Signal Process Control 2021; 68: 102662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102662
Pais-Vieira C, Figueiredo JG, Perrotta A, Matos D, Aguiar M, Ramos J, et al. Activation of a rhythmic lower limb movement pattern during the use of a multimodal brain–computer interface: a case study of a clinically complete spinal cord injury. Life (Basel) 2024; 14: 396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life14030396
Pais-Vieira C, Gaspar P, Matos D, Alves LP, da Cruz BM, Azevedo MJ, et al. Embodiment comfort levels during motor imagery training combined with immersive virtual reality in a spinal cord injury patient. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16: 909112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.909112
Soler D, Moriña D, Kumru H, Vidal J, Navarro X. Transcranial direct current stimulation and visual illusion effect according to sensory phenotypes in patients with spinal cord injury and neuropathic pain. J Pain 2021; 22: 86–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2020.06.004
Scandola M, Aglioti SM, Lazzeri G, Avesani R, Ionta S, Moro V. Visuo-motor and interoceptive influences on peripersonal space representation following spinal cord injury. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 5162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62080-1
Soler MD, Kumru H, Pelayo R, Vidal J, Tormos JM, Fregni F, et al. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation and visual illusion on neuro-pathic pain in spinal cord injury. Brain 2010; 133: 2565–2577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq184
Kumru H, Soler D, Vidal J, Navarro X, Tormos JM, Pascual‐Leone A, et al. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with visual illusion in neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury: an evoked potentials and quantitative thermal testing study. Eur J Pain 2013; 17: 55–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00167.x
de Sousa BL, Levy VS, Bestard GA, Cormane J, Ochoa-Diaz C. Integration of a virtual reality system with a FES-assisted trike for rehabilitation of indi-viduals with spinal cord injury. In: 2025 47th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). Cop-enhagen, IEEE; 2025. p. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC58623.2025.11253356
Nezon E, Patel T, Benson K, Chan K, Lee JW, Inness EL,
et al. Combining functional electrical stimulation with visual feedback balance training: a qualitative study of end-user perspectives on designing a clinically feasible intervention. BMJ Open 2025; 15: e090791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090791
Farella N. Virtual reality environment with low-cost haptic feedback thimble for post spinal cord injury upper-limb rehabilitation [dissertation]. Milan: Politecnico di Milano; 2018, p. 129
Gutiérrez Á, Farella N, Gil-Agudo Á, de los Reyes Guzmán A. Virtual reality environment with haptic feedback thimble for post spinal cord injury upper-limb rehabilitation. Appl Sci 2021; 11: 2476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062476
Nicolelis MAL, Alho EJL, Donati ARC, Yonamine S, Aratanha MA, Bao G, et al. Training with noninvasive brain–machine interface, tactile feedback, and locomotion to enhance neurological recovery in individuals with complete paraplegia: a randomized pilot study. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 20545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24864-5
Tidoni E, Abu-Alqumsan M, Leonardis D, Kapeller C, Fusco G, Guger C, et al. Local and remote cooperation with virtual and robotic agents: a p300 bci study in healthy and people living with spinal cord injury. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2017; 25: 1622–1632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2626391
Pozeg P, Palluel E, Ronchi R, Solcà M, Al-Khodairy AW, Jordan X, et al. Virtual reality improves embodiment and neuropathic pain caused by spinal cord injury. Neurology 2017; 89: 1894–1903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004585
Michibata A, Haraguchi M, Murakawa Y, Ishikawa H. Electrical stimulation and virtual reality-guided balance training for managing paraplegia and trunk dysfunction due to spinal cord infarction. BMJ Case Rep 2022; 15: e244091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2021-244091
Calabrò RS, Naro A, Leo A, Bramanti P. Usefulness of robotic gait training plus neuromodulation in chronic spinal cord injury: a case report. J Spinal Cord Med 2017; 40: 118–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2016.1153275
King CE, Wang PT, McCrimmon CM, Chou CCY, Do AH, Nenadic Z. Brain–computer interface driven functional electrical stimulation system for over-ground walking in spinal cord injury participant. In: 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Chicago: IEEE; 2014. p. 1238–1242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2014.6943821
Sabalette P, Dubé N, Ménard P, Labelle M, Laramée MT, Higgins J, et al. Immediate effect of alone and combined virtual reality, gait-like muscle vibrat-ion and transcranial direct current stimulation on neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 2024; 10: 83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-024-00696-5
Goel T, Sharma N, Gehlot A, Srivastav AK. Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality training to improve sitting balance control among individuals with acute and sub-acute paraplegia: a randomized clinical trial. J Spinal Cord Med 2023; 46: 964–974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2021.2012053
Kaura S, Zafar S, Majumdar P. Combined epidural stimulation and virtual reality rehabilitation for comprehensive neuromotor recovery following spinal cord injury: a single arm study. Global Spine J 2025; 21925682251389598.
Kaura S, Zafar S, Majumdar P. Combined epidural stimulation and virtual reality rehabilitation for comprehensive neuromotor recovery following spinal cord injury: a single arm study. Global Spine J 2026; 16: 1854–1868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251389598
Kirshblum S, Snider B, Eren F, Guest J. Characterizing natural recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2021; 38: 1267–1284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2020.7473
Glinsky JV, Chu J, Rimmer C, Roberts S, Scivoletto G, Tamburella F, et al. Safety and efficacy of intensive task-specific training in people with recent spinal cord injury: a phase 3, pragmatic, randomised, assessor-blinded, superiority trial. Lancet Neurol 2026; 25: 234–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(26)00010-4
Ellaway PH, Kuppuswamy A, Balasubramaniam AV, Maksimovic R, Gall A, Craggs MD, et al. Development of quantitative and sensitive assessments of physiological and functional outcome during recovery from spinal cord injury: a clinical initiative. Brain Res Bull 2011; 84: 343–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.08.007
Prochazka A, Kowalczewski J, Galea M. In-home tele-rehabilitation of the upper extremity. Physiotherapy 2011; 97: eS1022–S1023.
Soler D, Kumru H, Vidal J, Fregni F, Tormos JM, Navarro X, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and virtual reality (VR) techniques for treatment neuropathic central pain in spinal cord injury (NP_SCI). Eur J Pain Suppl 2010; 4: 105–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1754-3207(10)70375-8
Vuckovic A, Osuagwu B, Altaleb MKH, Czaja AZ, Fraser M, Purcell M. Brain–computer interface controlled functional electrical stimulation for rehabili-tation of hand function in people with spinal cord injury. In Müller-Putz G, Rupp R, editors. Neuroprosthetics and Brain-Computer Interfaces in Spinal Cord Injury. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2021. p. 281–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68545-4_12
Kirshblum S, Snider B, Engel-Haber E. Challenges and strategies for spinal cord injury research recruitment in rehabilitation hospitals: a single center perspective. Spinal Cord 2025; 63: 385–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-025-01094-w
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Samuel David Williamson, Magnus Møller Andersen, Anders Orup Aaby, Marianne Rahbek Vestergaard, Sophie Lykkegaard Ravn
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
