Factors associated with perceived work ability among people working one year after stroke: an exploratory cross-sectional study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.45817Keywords:
impairments, return to work, stroke, vocational rehabilitation, work abilityAbstract
Objective: Knowledge of factors contributing to sustained work ability after stroke is limited. This study explored the association between perceived work ability and personal, stroke-related and work-related factors.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Subjects: Individuals working 1 year after stroke.
Methods: A postal survey was completed by 88 individuals. The survey comprised questions on demographics, personal, stroke-related and work-related factors, and a set of validated questionnaires including the Work Ability Index (WAI). Data were analysed using logistic regression analyses with perceived overall work ability (WAI item 1) as the dependent variable (good or excellent vs poor or moderate work ability).
Results: Good or excellent work ability was perceived by 59% of the participants. In the final multivariable regression analyses, greater fatigue (OR 0.4; p < 0.001) and a poor work–life balance (OR 0.4; p < 0.005) were associated with lower odds for
perceiving good or excellent work ability, whereas a higher monthly income (OR 5.8; p < 0.008) and greater
mastery of work (OR 3.2; p < 0.007) were associated with higher odds.
Conclusion: Both stroke-related and work-related factors were associated with perceived work ability among individuals working 1 year after stroke. This indicates that several aspects need to be addressed to accomplish a sustainable work situation after stroke.
Downloads
References
Socialstyrelsen (The National Board on Health and Welfare). Statistics on stroke; 2024. Contract no.: 2025-11-9884. [cited 2025-11-18] Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer/statistics-on-stroke-2024-2025-11-9884/
Skajaa N, Adelborg K, Horvath-Puho E, Rothman KJ, Henderson VW, Thygesen LC, et al. Labour market participation and retirement after stroke in Denmark: registry based cohort study. BMJ 2023; 380: e072308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-072308
Duong PK, Egan MY, Meyer MJ, Morrison TL. Intention to return to work after stroke following rehabilitation in Ontario. Can J Occup Ther 2020; 87: 221–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417420905706
Sen A, Bisquera A, Wang Y, McKevitt CJ, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD, et al. Factors, trends, and long-term outcomes for stroke patients returning to work: the South London Stroke Register. Int J Stroke 2019; 14: 696–705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493019832997
Wassenius C, Claesson L, Blomstrand C, Jood K, Carlsson G. The centrality of work in everyday life after stroke: a qualitative study of long-term stroke survivors. Scand J Occup Ther 2023; 30: 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2023.2170914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2023.2170914
Alaszewski A, Alaszewski H, Potter J, Penhale B. Working after a stroke: survivors’ experiences and perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1858–1869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280601143356
Garland A, Jeon SH, Stepner M, Rotermann M, Fransoo R, Wunsch H, et al. Effects of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular health events on work and earnings: a population-based retrospective cohort study. CMAJ 2019; 191: E3–E10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.181238
Cain S, Churilov L, Collier JM, Carvalho LB, Borschmann K, Moodie M, et al. Factors associated with paid employment 12 months after stroke in A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT). Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2022; 65: 101565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101565
Palstam A, Westerlind E, Persson HC, Sunnerhagen KS. Work-related predictors for return to work after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2019; 139: 382–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13067
Nascimento LR, Scianni AA, Ada L, Fantauzzi MO, Hirochi TL, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Predictors of return to work after stroke: a prospective, observational cohort study with 6 months follow-up. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 43: 525–529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1631396
Lindgren I, Pessah-Rasmussen H, Gard G, Brogårdh C. Perceived work situation and work ability among persons who are working one year after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2022; 54: jrm00254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v53.918
Etuknwa A, Daniels K, Nayani R, Eib C. Sustainable return to work for workers with mental health and musculoskeletal conditions. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021057
Ilmarinen J. Work ability: a comprehensive concept for occupational health research and prevention. Scand J Work Environ Health 2009; 35: 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1304
Hartke RJ, Trierweiler R. Survey of survivors’ perspective on return to work after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2015; 22: 326–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000044
Lundin A, Kjellberg K, Leijon O, Punnett L, Hemmingsson T. The association between self-assessed future work ability and long-term sickness absence, disability pension and unemployment in a general working population: a 7-year follow-up study. J Occup Rehabil 2016; 26: 195–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-015-9603-4
Norlander A, Lindgren I, Brogårdh C. Factors associated with fatigue among people who have returned to work after stroke: an exploratory study. J Rehabil Med 2024; 56: jrm18668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.18668
Palstam A, Törnbom M, Sunnerhagen KS. Experiences of returning to work and maintaining work 7 to 8 years after a stroke: a qualitative interview study in Sweden. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e021182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021182
Lallukka T, Ervasti J, Lundström E, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Friberg E, Virtanen M, et al. Trends in diagnosis-specific work disability before and after stroke: a longitudinal population-based study in Sweden. J Am Heart Assoc 2018; 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006991
Roland M, Rudberg AS, Alexanderson K, Sjöstrand C. Sickness absence and disability pension patterns before and after ischemic stroke: a Swedish longitudinal cohort study with matched references. Eur Stroke J 2024; 10: 23969873241261011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873241261011
van der Kemp J, Kruithof WJ, Nijboer TCW, van Bennekom CAM, van Heugten C, Visser-Meily JMA. Return to work after mild-to-moderate stroke: work satisfaction and predictive factors. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2017; 29: 638–653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2017.1313746
Vlachos G, Ihle-Hansen H, Wyller TB, Braekhus A, Mangset M, Hamre C, et al. Factors determining not returning to full-time work 12 months after mild ischemic stroke. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl 2023; 5: 100245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100245
Balasooriya-Smeekens C, Bateman A, Mant J, De Simoni A. Barriers and facilitators to staying in work after stroke: insight from an online forum. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e009974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009974
Lindgren I, Brogårdh C, Pessah-Rasmussen H, Jonasson SB, Gard G. Work conditions, support, and changing personal priorities are perceived important for return to work and for stay at work after stroke: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2020; 44: 2500–2506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1836522
Gard G, Pessah-Rasmussen H, Brogårdh C, Nilsson A, Lindgren I. Need for structured healthcare organization and support for return to work after stroke in Sweden: experiences of stroke survivors. J Rehabil Med 2019; 51: 741–748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2591
Norlander A, Lindgren I, Pessah-Rasmussen H, Gard G, Brogårdh C. Fatigue in men and women who have returned to work after stroke: assessed with the Fatigue Severity Scale and Mental Fatigue Scale. J Rehabil Med 2021; 53: jrm00227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2863
Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A. Work Ability Index. 2nd ed. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 1998.
Lundin A, Leijon O, Vaez M, Hallgren M, Torgén M. Predictive validity of the Work Ability Index and its individual items in the general population. Scand J Public Health 2017; 45: 350–356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817702759
Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999; 30: 2131–2140. https://doi.org/ 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2131
Mulder M, Nijland R. Stroke Impact Scale. J Physiother 2016; 62: 117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2016.02.002
Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD. The fatigue severity scale: application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol 1989; 46: 1121–1123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022
Mattsson M, Möller B, Lundberg I, Gard G, Boström C. Reliability and validity of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Swedish for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand J Rheumatol 2008; 37: 269–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03009740801914868
Ozyemisci-Taskiran O, Batur EB, Yuksel S, Cengiz M, Karatas GK. Validity and reliability of fatigue severity scale in stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2019; 26: 122–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2018.1550957
Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: Measures in health psychology: a user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor: NferNelson; 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t00393-000
Lindström K, Dallner M, Elo A-L, Gamberale F, Knardahl S, Skogstad A, Örhede E. Review of psychological and social factors at work and suggestions for the General Nordic Questionnaire (QPSNordic). Copenhagen: Nordisk Ministerråd; 1997.
Wännström I, Peterson U, Åsberg M, Nygren Å, Gustavsson JP. Psychometric properties of scales in the General Nordic Questionnaire for Psychological and Social Factors at Work (QPS): confirmatory factor analysis and prediction of certified long-term sickness absence. Scand J Psychol 2009; 50: 231–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00697.x
English C, Simpson DB, Billinger SA, Churilov L, Coupland KG, Drummond A, et al. A roadmap for research in post-stroke fatigue: consensus-based core recommendations from the third Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke 2024; 19: 133–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930231189135
Cumming TB, Packer M, Kramer SF, English C. The prevalence of fatigue after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke 2016; 11: 968–977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493016669861
Törnbom K, Hadartz K, Sunnerhagen KS. Self-perceived participation and autonomy at 1-year post stroke: a part of the Stroke Arm Longitudinal Study at the University of Gothenburg (SALGOT Study). J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2018; 27: 1115–1122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.11.028
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ingrid Lindgren, Anna Norlander, Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen, Christina Brogårdh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
