Sense of coherence and rehabilitation outcomes: a 3-year longitudinal study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.46229Keywords:
Functional Rehabilitation, Sense of Coherence, PROMs, Health, physical and mental functioning, Coping resourcesAbstract
Objectives: To examine Sense of Coherence over a 3-year period and investigate whether baseline levels and changes in Sense of Coherence are associated with rehabilitation outcomes.
Design: Longitudinal cohort study.
Participants: Patients accepted for specialized rehabilitation (n = 601).
Methods: Sense of Coherence and rehabilitation outcomes, defined by health and functioning were assessed before rehabilitation and after 3 years after using the 13-item Sense of Coherence questionnaire, the EuroQol visual analogue scale, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36. Sense of Coherence was analysed descriptively, and associations with rehabilitation outcomes were examined using analysis of covariance, adjusted for age, sex, level of education, referral diagnosis, and multimorbidity.
Results: Participants reported lower Sense of Coherence, health, and functioning compared with reference populations. Mean change in Sense of Coherence over 3 years was small at the group level, at 0.7 (SD 9.7) points. Substantial variation was observed in both baseline Sense of Coherence and individual change over time. Both baseline Sense of Coherence and change in Sense of Coherence were independently associated with rehabilitation outcomes, with stronger associations observed for overall health and mental functioning than for physical functioning.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that interventions aimed at strengthening Sense of Coherence may improve rehabilitation outcomes across patient groups.
Downloads
References
Posadzki P, Glass N. Self-efficacy and the sense of coherence: narrative review and a conceptual synthesis. Sci World J 2009; 9: 924–933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2009.107
Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Functioning: the third health indicator in the health system and the key indicator for rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 53: 134–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04565-8
Stucki G, Cieza A, Melvin J. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): a unifying model for the conceptual description of the rehabilitation strategy. J Rehabil Med 2007; 39: 279–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0041
Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health: how people manage stress and stay well. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1987.
Danioni F, Sorgente A, Barni D, Canzi E, Ferrari L, Ranieri S, et al. Sense of Coherence and COVID-19: a longitudinal study. J Psychol 2021; 155: 657–677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2021.1952151
Lindahl M, Juneja H, Teljigovic S, Rafn J, Nielsen NO. Change in sense of coherence and health-related quality of life after injury: a prospective cohort study. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 43: 1532–1541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1669224
Jörgensen S, Lennman E, Lexell J. Sense of coherence and changes over six years among older adults aging with long-term spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2021; 59: 1278–1284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-021-00713-6
Odajima Y, Kawaharada M, Wada N. Development and validation of an educational program to enhance sense of coherence in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Nagoya J Med Sci 2017; 79: 363–374.
Malm D, Fridlund B, Ekblad H, Karlström P, Hag E, Pakpour AH. Effects of brief mindfulness-based cognitive behavioural therapy on health-related quality of life and sense of coherence in atrial fibrillation patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2018; 17: 589–597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515118762796
Dehnavi S, Mohammadi AZ, Hassaniraad M. Effectiveness of unity-oriented psychodrama on sense of coherence of MS patients. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci 2018; 13: 5869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.5869
Norrbrink Budh C, Kowalski J, Lundeberg T. A comprehensive pain management programme comprising educational, cognitive and behavioural interventions for neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 2006; 38: 172–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970500476258
Amirkhan JH, Greaves H. Sense of coherence and stress: the mechanics of a healthy disposition. Psychol Health 2003; 18: 31–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0887044021000044233
Feldt T, Leskinen E, Koskenvuo M, Suominen S, Vahtera J, Kivimaki M. Development of sense of coherence in adulthood: a person-centered approach. The population-based HeSSup cohort study. Qual Life Res 2011; 20: 69–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9720-7
Moen VP, Eide GE, Drageset J, Gjesdal S. Sense of coherence, disability, and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study of rehabilitation patients in Norway. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2019; 100: 448–457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.009
Gunnarsson AB, Bjorklund A. Sustainable enhancement in clients who perceive the Tree Theme MethodR as a positive intervention in psychosocial occupational therapy. Aust Occup Ther J 2013; 60: 154–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12034
Gasana J, O’Keeffe T, Withers TM, Greaves CJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the long-term effects of physical activity interventions on objectively measured outcomes. BMC Public Health 2023; 23: 1697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16541-7
Schafer SK, Schanz CG, Sopp MR, Lass-Hennemann J, Kafer M, Michael T. Pre-rehabilitation sense of coherence as a predictor of symptom change after rehabilitation. Stress Health 2020; 36: 546–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2949
Berget AM, Moen VP, Hustoft M, Eide GE, Skouen JS, Strand LI, et al. Long-term change and predictors of change in physical and mental function after rehabilitation: a multi-centre study. J Rehabil Med 2023; 55: jrm00358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v55.2809
Moen VP, Drageset J, Eide GE, Gjesdal S. Dimensions and predictors of disability: a baseline study of patients entering somatic rehabilitation in secondary care. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0193761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193761
Moen VP. Disability in patients entering rehabilitation centres in secondary care in Norway: a cross-sectional study of predictors and the relationship with sense of coherence and health-related quality of life. Bergen: University of Bergen; 2018.
Eriksson M, Lindstrom B. Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60: 376–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.041616
Grevenstein D, Bluemke M. Measurement invariance of the SOC-13 sense of coherence scale across gender and age groups. Eur J Psychol Assess 2022; 38: 61–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000641
Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003; 41: 582–592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C
Brazier J, Jones N, Kind P. Testing the validity of the Euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 169–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435221
Chen P, Lin KC, Liing RJ, Wu CY, Chen CL, Chang KC. Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation. Qual Life Res 2016; 25: 1585–1596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1196-z
Nolan CM, Longworth L, Lord J, Canavan JL, Jones SE, Kon SS, et al. The EQ-5D-5L health status questionnaire in COPD: validity, responsiveness and minimum important difference. Thorax 2016; 71: 493–500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207782
Obradovic M, Lal A, Liedgens H. Validity and responsiveness of EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) versus Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) questionnaire in chronic pain. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013; 11: 110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-110
Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Dewey JE. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Inc; 2000.
Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: a user´s manual. Boston, MA: Health Assessment Lab; 1994.
Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ 1993; 306: 1440–1444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1440
Sandvik H, Ruths S, Hunskaar S, Blinkenberg J, Hetlevik O. Construction and validation of a morbidity index based on the International Classification of Primary Care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2022; 40: 305–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2022.2097617
Senn S. Change from baseline and analysis of covariance revisited. Stat Med 2006; 25: 4334–4344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2682
Lindmark U, Stenstrom U, Gerdin EW, Hugoson A. The distribution of “sense of coherence” among Swedish adults: a quantitative cross-sectional population study. Scand J Public Health 2010; 38: 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494809351654
Luyckx K, Goossens E, Apers S, Rassart J, Klimstra T, Dezutter J, et al. The 13-Item Sense of Coherence Scale in Dutch-speaking adolescents and young adults: structural validity, age trends, and chronic disease. Psychologica Belgica 2012; 52: 351–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-52-4-368
Hallstam A, Lofgren M, Benson L, Svensen C, Stalnacke BM. Assessment and treatment at a pain clinic: a one-year follow-up of patients with chronic pain. Scand J Pain 2017; 17: 233–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.08.004
Maruish M, Maruish M, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Gandek B, Turner-Bowker D, et al. User’s manual for the SF36v2 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Inc; 2011.
Shaw C, Longworth L, Bennett B, McEntee-Richardson L, Shaw JW. A scoping review of the use of minimally important difference of EQ-5D utility index and EQ-VAS scores in health technology assessment. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2024; 22: 63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-024-02272-9
Moen VP, Hetlevik O, Eide GE, Gjesdal S. Endring i helse, funksjon og helserelatert livskvalitet etter gjennomført somatisk rehabilitering i spesialisthelsetjenesten. https://doi.org/The Norwegian National Physiotherapy Conference; 2018; Lillestrøm, Norway; 2018.
Lillefjell M, Jakobsen K. Sense of coherence as a predictor of work reentry following multidisciplinary rehabilitation for individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. J Occup Health Psychol 2007; 12: 222–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.222
Sinikallio S, Pakarinen M, Tuomainen I, Airaksinen O, Viinamaki H, Aalto TJ. Preoperative sense of coherence associated with the 10-year outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. J Health Psychol 2019; 24: 989–997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316687633
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anne Mette Berget, Øystein Hetlevik, Merethe Hustoft, Jörg Assmus, Vegard Phil Moen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
