Psychometric properties of the timed backward walk test in people with stroke
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.46292Keywords:
gait, postural balance, Psychometrics, rehabilitation, stroke, walkingAbstract
Objective: To examine the psychometric properties of the Timed Backward Walk test in people with stroke.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Subjects: 60 people with stroke and 30 healthy adults aged 55 years and older.
Methods: Participants performed the Timed Backward Walk test and standard clinical assessments. Discriminative validity was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve. Reliability (one-week test–retest, inter-rater, intra-rater) was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. Construct validity was examined through correlations with motor function, strength, balance, and gait measures.
Results: People with chronic stroke took significantly longer to complete the test than healthy adults (p < 0.001), with an area under the curve of 0.968 and an optimal cut-off of 7.22 s. Test–retest, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability were all excellent. The standard error of measurement was 1.62 s and the minimal detectable change was 4.49 s. The complete time showed strong positive correlations with functional mobility and gait speed measures (ρ = 0.840–0.897) and moderate negative correlations with balance, lower-limb motor function, and ankle dorsiflexor strength (ρ = –0.408 to –0.647).
The Timed Backward Walk test demonstrated excellent reliability, discriminative validity, and construct validity in people with chronic stroke. It is a feasible and sensitive complement to forward gait assessments.
Downloads
References
Wang J, Xu J, An R. Effectiveness of backward walking training on balance performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture 2019; 68: 466–475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.01.002
Hoogkamer W, Meyns P, Duysens J. Steps forward in understanding backward gait: from basic circuits to rehabilitation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2014; 42: 23–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/JES.0000000000000000
Yang YR, Yen JG, Wang RY, Yen LL, Lieu FK. Gait outcomes after additional backward walking training in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 264–273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215505cr860oa
Beyaert C, Vasa R, Frykberg GE. Gait post-stroke: pathophysiology and rehabilitation strategies. Neurophysiol Clin 2015; 45: 335–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2015.09.005
Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011; 377: 1693–1702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5
Edwards EM, Kegelmeyer DA, Kloos AD, Nitta M, Raza D, Nichols-Larsen DS, et al. Backward walking and dual-task assessment improve identification of gait impairments and fall risk in individuals with MS. Mult Scler Int 2020; 2020: 6707414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6707414
Hackney ME, Earhart GM. Backward walking in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2009; 24: 218–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22330
Graham JE, Ostir GV, Fisher SR, Ottenbacher KJ. Assessing walking speed in clinical research: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 2008; 14: 552–562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00917.x
Bansal K, Vistamehr A, Conroy CL, Fox EJ, Rose DK. The influence of backward versus forward locomotor training on gait speed and balance control post-stroke: recovery or compensation? J Biomech 2023; 155: 111644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111644
Bowden MG, Balasubramanian CK, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Anterior-posterior ground reaction forces as a measure of paretic leg contribution in hemiparetic walking. Stroke 2006; 37: 872–876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000204063.75779.8d
Patterson KK, Parafianowicz I, Danells CJ, Closson V, Verrier MC, Staines WR, et al. Gait asymmetry in community-ambulating stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 304–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.142
Fulk GD, Reynolds C, Mondal S, Deutsch JE. Predicting home and community walking activity in people with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 1582–1586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.005
Abit Kocaman A, Aydogan Arslan S, Ugurlu K, Katirci Kirmaci ZI, Keskin ED. Validity and reliability of the 3-Meter Backward Walk Test in individuals with stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021; 30: 105462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105462
DeMark LA, Fox EJ, Manes MR, Conroy C, Rose DK. The 3-Meter Backward Walk Test (3MBWT): reliability and validity in individuals with subacute and chronic stroke. Physiother Theory Pract 2023; 39: 2698–2705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2022.2085638
Krumpoch S, Lindemann U, Rappl A, Becker C, Sieber CC, Freiberger E. The effect of different test protocols and walking distances on gait speed in older persons. Aging Clin Exp Res 2021; 33: 141–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01703-z
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007; 370: 1453–1457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010; 19: 539–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
Hodkinson HM. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing 1972; 1: 233–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/1.4.233
Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/1650197771331
Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health 1992; 83: S7–11.
Pickerill ML, Harter RA. Validity and reliability of limits-of-stability testing: a comparison of 2 postural stability evaluation devices. J Athl Train 2011; 46: 600–606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-46.6.600
Ford-Smith CD, Wyman JF, Elswick RK Jr, Fernandez T, Newton RA. Test–retest reliability of the sensory organization test in noninstitutionalized older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 77–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80047-6
Watson MJ. Refining the ten-metre walking test for use with neurologically impaired people. Physiotherapy 2002; 88: 386–397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61264-3
Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The Timed Up & Go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1641–1647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.011
Ng SSM, Ho LYW, Chan NH, Liu TW, So B. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Oxford participation and activities questionnaire in people with stroke. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315450
Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol 2010; 5: 1315–1316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15: 155–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Weir JP. Quantifying test–retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 231–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200502000-00038
Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 2018; 126: 1763–1768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
Li S. Spasticity, motor recovery, and neural plasticity after stroke. Front Neurol 2017; 8: 120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00120
Bowden MG, Clark DJ, Kautz SA. Evaluation of abnormal synergy patterns poststroke: relationship of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment to hemiparetic locomotion. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24: 328–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968309343215
Proske U, Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev 2012; 92: 1651–1697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00048.2011
Cullen KE. Vestibular processing during natural self-motion: implications for perception and action. Nat Rev Neurosci 2019; 20: 346–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0153-1
Grasso R, Bianchi L, Lacquaniti F. Motor patterns for human gait: backward versus forward locomotion. J Neurophysiol 1998; 80: 1868–1885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.80.4.1868
World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yu Qin, Siyue Li, Peiming Chen, Thomson W.L. Wong, Cynthia Y.Y. Lai, Shamay S.M. Ng

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.