Stakeholder priorities for rehabilitation to support functioning at home and work among people on sick leave due to low back pain: a group concept mapping study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.46346Keywords:
Activities of daily living, Back Pain, biopsychosocial, Rehabilitation, Return to Work, Sick leave, ParticipationAbstract
Objective: To identify, organize, and prioritize stakeholder-defined components of rehabilitation to support functioning in everyday life, at home and at work, among people on sick leave due to low back pain.
Design: Participatory mixed-methods study using group concept mapping conducted in Denmark.
Subjects/patients: Participants with lived experience of low back pain and sickness absence, healthcare and employment professionals, workplace representatives, and researchers.
Methods: Stakeholders completed online brainstorming, sorting, and rating, followed by a validation workshop. Multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis were applied.
Results: Brainstorming involved 101 participants and generated 190 ideas, synthesized into 125 statements. Sorting and rating data were provided by 23 and 36 participants, respectively. Eleven participants attended the validation workshop. Six clusters consisted of self-management, physical training and activity, workplace involvement, interdisciplinary coordination, individual support, and extended assessment. Thirty-nine statements (31.2%) were rated very important and all clusters received high importance ratings.
Conclusion: Stakeholder priorities encompassed physical, psychological, social, and work-related aspects of rehabilitation, consistent with a biopsychosocial perspective. Rehabilitation was conceptualized as a coordinated, adaptive, and person-centred process across sectors and everyday-life contexts. Although represented across clusters, functioning at home did not emerge as a distinct domain and requires further attention in low back pain rehabilitation.
Downloads
References
GBD 2021 Low Back Pain Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of low back pain, 1990-2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol 2023; 5: e316–e329.
Fatoye F, Gebrye T, Ryan CG, Useh U, Mbada C. Global and regional estimates of clinical and economic burden of low back pain in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health 2023; 11: 1098100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1098100
Mairey I, Rosenkilde S, Klitgaard MB, Thygesen LC. Sygdomsbyrden i Danmark – sygdomme. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen; 2023.
Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay S, et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet 2018; 391: 2356–2367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X
Wallwork SB, Braithwaite FA, O’Keeffe M, Travers MJ, Summers SJ, Lange B, et al. The clinical course of acute, subacute and persistent low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2024; 196: E29–E46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.230542
Edwards RR, Dworkin RH, Sullivan MD, Turk DC, Wasan AD. The role of psychosocial processes in the development and maintenance of chronic pain. J Pain 2016; 17: T70–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2016.01.001
Otero-Ketterer E, Peñacoba-Puente C, Ferreira Pinheiro-Araujo C, Valera-Calero JA, Ortega-Santiago R. Biopsychosocial factors for chronicity in individuals with non-specific low back pain: an umbrella review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19: 10145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610145
World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
Froud R, Patterson S, Eldridge S, Seale C, Pincus T, Rajendran D, et al. A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people’s lives. BMC Musculo-skelet Disord 2014; 15: 50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-50
Grabovac I, Dorner TE. Association between low back pain and various everyday performances: activities of daily living, ability to work and sexual function. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2019; 131: 541–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-019-01542-7
Azer G, Gibbs MT, Jones MD, Morrison NMV, Azer A, Marshall PW. How and why do people with chronic low back pain modify their physical activity? A mixed-methods survey. Musculoskelet Care 2024; 22: e1885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1885
Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, Smeets RJ, Ostelo RW, Guzman J, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014: CD000963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000963.pub3
World Health Organization. WHO guideline for non-surgical management of chronic primary low back pain in adults in primary and community care settings. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.
Marin TJ, Van Eerd D, Irvin E, Couban R, Koes BW, Malmivaara A, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 6: CD002193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002193.pub2
Bernaers L, Cnockaert E, Braeckman L, Mairiaux P, Willems TM. Disability and return to work after a multidisciplinary intervention for (sub)acute low back pain: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2023; 37: 964–974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155221146447
Andersen KS, Hansen AP, Pedersen P, Langagergaard V, Nielsen CV, Løvschall C, et al. Effectiveness of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation including workplace interventions for employees on sick leave due to low back pain: a systematic review. Work 2026; 84: 929–945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815261423506
Williams RM, Westmorland MG, Lin CA, Schmuck G, Creen M. Effectiveness of workplace rehabilitation interventions in the treatment of work-related low back pain: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 607–624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600841513
van Vilsteren M, van Oostrom SH, de Vet HC, Franche RL, Boot CR, Anema JR. Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 10: CD006955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006955.pub3
Larsen EL, Nielsen CV, Jensen C. Getting the pain right: how low back pain patients manage and express their pain experiences. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 35: 819–827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.709302
Mescouto K, Olson RE, Hodges PW, Setchell J. A critical review of the biopsychosocial model of low back pain care: time for a new approach? Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44: 3270–3284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1851783
de Bruin LJE, Hoegh M, Greve C, Reneman MF. Insufficient evidence for load as the primary cause of nonspecific (chronic) low back pain: a scoping review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024; 54: 176–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.11314
Russo F, Papalia GF, Vadalà G, Fontana L, Iavicoli S, Papalia R, et al. The effects of workplace interventions on low back pain in workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 12614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312614
O'Cathain A, Croot L, Duncan E, Rousseau N, Sworn K, Turner KM, et al. Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e029954. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029954
Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2021; 374: n2061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2061
Trochim WMK. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann 1989; 12: 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5
Trochim WMK, Kane M. Concept mapping: an introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. Int J Qual Health Care 2005; 17: 187–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi038
Kane M, Trochim WMK. Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983730
Pantha S, Jones M, Gray R. Development of a reporting guideline for Trochim’s concept mapping. Methods Protoc 2025; 8: 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mps8020024
The Concept System® groupwisdom™ (Build 2022.30.10) [Web-based platform] Ithaca, NY; 2022. Available from: https://www.groupwisdom.tech
Wade DT. What is rehabilitation? An empirical investigation leading to an evidence-based description. Clin Rehabil 2020; 34: 571–583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520905112
Ceulemans D, Moens M, Reneman M, Callens J, De Smedt A, Godderis L, et al. Biopsychosocial rehabilitation in the working population with chronic low back pain: a concept analysis. J Rehabil Med 2024; 56: jrm13454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.13454
O’Connell N, Moore RA, Stewart G, Fisher E, Hearn L, Eccleston C, et al. Trials we cannot trust: investigating their impact on systematic reviews and clinical guidelines in spinal pain. J Pain 2023; 24: 2103–2130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2023.07.003
Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014; 348: g1687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1687
Nieminen L, Vuori J, Kankaanpää M. An early biopsychosocial intervention design for the prevention of low back pain chronicity: a multidisciplinary empirical approach. J Rehabil Med 2022; 54: jrm00338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v54.2723
Wade D. Rehabilitation – a new approach. Part four: a new paradigm, and its implications. Clin Rehabil 2016; 30: 109–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215515601177
Rossen CB, Høybye MT, Jørgensen LB, Bruun LD, Hybholt L. Disrupted everyday life in the trajectory of low back pain: a longitudinal qualitative study of the cross-sectorial pathways of individuals with low back pain over time. Int J Nurs Stud Adv 2021; 3: 100021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100021
Coole C, Drummond A, Watson PJ, Radford K. What concerns workers with low back pain? Findings of a qualitative study of patients referred for rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil 2010; 20: 472–480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9237-5
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Katrine Schilling Andersen, Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens, Claus Vinther Nielsen, Reuben Escorpizo, Bodil Kaalund Bruun, Marc Sampedro Pilegaard
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
