Comparison of attention process training and activity-based attention training after acquired brain injury: A randomized controlled study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2875Keywords:
cognitive rehabilitation, performance-based assessments, stroke, traumatic brain injury, process skills, work abilityAbstract
Objectives: To compare the effects of 2 interventions for attention deficits in people with acquired brain injury, Attention Process Training (APT) and Activity--based Attention Training (ABAT), on activity and participation.
Design: Randomized controlled study.
Patients: The study included 51 patients in out-patient rehabilitation 4–12 months after stroke or traumatic brain injury.
Methods: Intervention: 20 h of attention training. Measurements: Assessment of Work Performance (AWP), Work Ability Index (WAI), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), and Rating Scale of Attentional Behavior (RSAB).
Results: Between-group comparisons showed significantly improved process skills after APT: Mental Energy (p = 0.000, ES = 1.84), Knowledge (p = 0.003, ES = 1.78), Temporal Organization (p = 0.000, ES=1.43) and Adaptation (p = 0.001, ES = 1.59). For within-group comparisons significant improvement was found between pre- and post-measures for both groups on COPM Performance (APT: p = 0.001, ES=1.85; ABAT: p = 0.001, ES = 1.84) and Satisfaction (APT: p = 0.000, ES=1.92; ABAT: p = 0.000, ES = 2.40) and RSAB Total Score (ABAT: p = 0.027, ES = 0.81; APT: p = 0.007, ES = 1.03).
Conclusion: We found significant differences favouring APT before ABAT for process skills (AWP). There were no discernible differences in global measures of activity between the 2 approaches: both groups improved significantly, as indicated by ES. The results of this study highlight the complexities of influencing behaviour on the level of body functions while measuring effects on activity.
Lay Abstract
The focus of this study is on training of attention deficits after acquired brain injury. The study compared 2 training methods; one directly training attention (Attention Process Training; APT) and another training attention in daily activities (Activity-based Attention Training; ABAT). The APT group improved somewhat more in work performance skills regarding organization of tasks, maintaining focus and adjusting to changes, compared with the ABAT group. The APT group rated an improvement from poor to moderate work ability, while the ABAT group maintained poor work ability. Self-assessed work ability was not estimated “excellent” for any participant at any assessment point. Both groups demonstrated medium to large improvements in performance ratings for daily activities and for satisfaction in performance. Their attention improved, as observed by physiotherapists/occupational therapists during training.
Downloads
References
Socialstyrelsen. Socialstyrelsen.se/statistik [cited 2021 July 15). Avaliable from: https: //www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik-och-data/statistik/statistikdatabasen 2019.
Peeters W, van den Brande R, Polinder S, Brazinova A, Steyerberg E, Lingsma H, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe. Acta Neurochir 2015; 157: 1683-1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2512-7
Feigin VL, Barker-Collo S, Parag V, Senior H, Lawes CMM, Ratnasabapathy Y, et al. Auckland Stroke Outcomes Study: Part 1: Gender, stroke types, ethnicity, and functional outcomes 5 years poststroke. Neurology 2010; 75: 1597-1607. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fb44b3
Ponsford JL, Downing MG, Olver J, Ponsford M, Acher R, Carty M, et al. Longitudinal follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury: outcome at two, five, and ten years post-injury. J Neurotrauma 2014; 31: 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2013.2997
Mani K, Cater B, Hudlikar A. Cognition and return to work after mild/moderate traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Work (Reading, Mass.) 2017; 58: 51. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-172597
McFadden S, MacDonald A, Fogarty A, Le S, Merritt BK. Vocational assessment: a review of the literature from an occupation-based perspective. Scand J Occup Ther 2010; 17: 43-48. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038120903096633
Loetscher T, Lincoln NB. Cognitive rehabilitation for attention deficits following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 33-42.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002842.pub2
Rohling ML, Faust ME, Beverly B, Demakis G. Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a meta-analytic re-examination of Cicerone et al.'s (2000, 2005) systematic reviews. Neuropsychology 2009; 23: 20-39. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013659
Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Effectiveness of an attention-training program. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1987; 9: 117-130.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638708405352
Markovic G, Schult M, Elg M, Bartfai A. Beneficial effects of early attention process training after acquired brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 2020; 52: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2628
Cicerone KD, Goldin Y, Ganci K, Rosenbaum A, Wethe JV, Langenbahn DM, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: systematic review of the literature from 2009 through 2014. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2019; 100: 1515-1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.02.011
Mitrushina M, Tomaszewski R. Factors associated with return to work in patients with long-term disabilities due to neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2019; 29: 1313-1331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2017.1395746
Noack H, Lövdén M, Schmiedek F. On the validity and generality of transfer effects in cognitive training research. Psychol Res 2014; 78: 773-789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0564-6
Björkdahl A, Åkerlund E, Svensson S, Esbjörnsson E. A randomized study of computerized working memory training and effects on functioning in everyday life for patients with brain injury. Brain Inj 2013; 27: 1658-1665. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2013.830196
Couillet J, Soury S, Lebornec G, Asloun S, Joseph PA, Mazaux JM, et al. Rehabilitation of divided attention after severe traumatic brain injury: a randomised trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2010; 20: 321-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010903467746
Bartfai A, Markovic G, Sargenius Landahl K, Schult M. The protocol and design of a randomised controlled study on training of attention within the first year after acquired brain injury. BMC Neurol 2014; 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-14-102
Landahl KS. Evaluation of attention training after aquired brain injury: an occupational perspective. Inst för kliniska vetenskaper, Danderyds sjukhus/Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital; 2021.
Lezak M, Howieson D, Bigler E, Tranel D. Neuropsychological assessment 5th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
Sandqvist J, Törnquist K, Henriksson C. Assessment of Work Performance - development of an instrument. Work 2006; 26: 379-387.
https://doi.org/10.1037/t70977-000
Sandqvist JL, Henriksson CM, Gullberg MT, Gerdle BUC. Content validity and utility of the Assessment of Work Performance (AWP). Work 2008; 30: 441-445.
Sandqvist J, Björk M, Gullberg M, Henriksson C, Gerdle B. Construct validity of the Assessment of Work Performance (AWP). Work 2009; 32: 211-221. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2009-0807
Sargénius Landahl K, Sandqvist J, Bartfai A, Schult M-L. Is a structured work task application for the assessment of work performance in a constructed environment, useful for patients with attention deficits? Disabil Rehabil 2019: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1674391
Ilmarinen J. The Work Ability Index (WAI). Occupat Med 2006; 57: 160. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqm008
Pranjic N, Gonzales JMG, Cvejanov-Kezunović L. Perceived Work Ability Index of public service employees in relation to ageing and gender: a comparison in three European countries. Slovenian J Public Health 2019; 58: 179-188. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2019-0023
Schouten LS, Bültmann U, Heymans MW, Joling CI, Twisk JWR, Roelen CAM. Shortened version of the Work Ability Index to identify workers at risk of long-term sickness absence. Eur J Public Health 2016; 26: 301-305. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv198
Lundin A, Leijon O, Vaez M, Hallgren M, Torgén M. Predictive validity of the Work Ability Index and its individual items in the general population. Scand J Public Health 2017; 45: 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817702759
Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther 2004; 71: 210-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740407100406
Ponsford J, Kinsella G. The use of a Rating Scale of Attentional Behaviour. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1991; 1: 241-257.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09602019108402257
Vallat-Azouvi C, Dana-Gordon C, Mazaux J-M, Ponsford J, Azouvi P. Psychometric properties of the French version of the Rating Scale of Attentional Behaviour. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2019; 29: 1149-1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2017.1372296
Dymowski AR, Ponsford JL, Willmott C. Cognitive training approaches to remediate attention and executive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury: a single-case series. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2016; 26: 866-894. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2015.1102746
Averbuch S, Katz N. Cognitive rehabilitation: a retraining model for clients with neurological disabilities. In: Katz N, editor. Cognition, occupation, and participation across the life span: neuroscience, neurorehabilitation, and models of intervention in occupational therapy. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press; 2011.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edn. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
Sawilowsky SS. New effect size rules of thumb. J Mod App Stat Methods 2009; 8: 597-599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
Johansson B, Tornmalm M. Working memory training for patients with acquired brain injury: effects in daily life. Scand J Occup Ther 2012; 19: 176-183. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2011.603352
Lundqvist A, Grundström K, Samuelsson K, Rönnberg J. Computerized training of working memory in a group of patients suffering from acquired brain injury. Brain Inj 2010; 24: 1173-1183. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2010.498007
Barker-Collo SL, Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Parag V, Senior H, Rodgers A. Reducing attention deficits after stroke using attention process training: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke; J Cereb Circ 2009; 40: 3293-3298. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.558239
Sohlberg MM, McLaughlin KA, Pavese A, Heidrich A, Posner MI. Evaluation of attention process training and brain injury education in persons with acquired brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2000; 22: 656-676. https://doi.org/10.1076/1380-3395(200010)22:5;1-9;FT656
Bodiam C. The Use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for the Assessment of Outcome on a Neurorehabil Unit. Br J Occup Ther 1999; 62: 123-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269906200310
Jenkinson N, Ownsworth T, Shum D. Utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in community-based brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Inj 2007; 21: 1283-1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050701739531
Beit Yosef A, Jacobs JM, Shenkar S, Shames J, Schwartz I, Doryon Y, et al. Activity performance, participation, and quality of life among adults in the chronic stage after acquired brain injury - the feasibility of an occupation-based telerehabilitation intervention. Front Neurol 2019; 10: 1247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01247
Boyer G, Hachey R, Mercier C. Perceptions of occupational performance and subjective quality of life in persons with severe mental illness. Occup Ther Ment Health 2000; 15: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1300/J004v15n02_01
Toomey M, Nicholson D, Carswell A. The Clinical Utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther 1995; 62: 242-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841749506200503
Iramaneerat C, Yudkowsky R. Rater errors in a clinical skills assessment of medical students. Eval Health Prof 2007; 30: 266-283.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278707304040
Park HY, Maitra K, Martinez KM. The effect of occupation-based cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Occup Ther Int 2015; 22: 104-116. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.1389
Boman I, Lindstedt M, Hemmingsson H, Bartfai A. Cognitive training in home environment. Brain Inj 2004; 18: 985-995.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050410001672396
Spencer-Smith M, Klingberg T. Benefits of a working memory training program for inattention in daily life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One 2015; 10: 617-633. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119522
Kizony R, Katz N. Relationships between Cognitive Abilities and the Process Scale and Skills of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) in patients with stroke. Occup Particip Health 2002; 22: 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/153944920202200205
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Kristina Sargénius Landahl, Marie-Louise Schult, Kristian Borg, Aniko Bartfai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
