Psychosocial Factors Associated with Prolonged Length of Stay in Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v55.4824Keywords:
head injury, rehabilitation, length of stayAbstract
Objective: In a climate of rising healthcare costs and increasing pressure to reduce inpatient length of stay, hospitals must balance their role as care providers with that as resource stewards. There is a need to understand what factors are associated with patients staying beyond rehabilitation length of stay targets. The aim of this study was to determine psychosocial patient factors that are identifiable on admission that influence length of stay targets in acquired brain injury rehabilitation.
Methods: A retrospective case series of 167 inpatients with acquired brain injury was conducted at an urban, academic rehabilitation hospital. A total of 29 factors were used for data analysis. Logistic and multiple linear regression analysis was utilized to determine if any patient factors were associated with patients exceeding their length of stay targets.
Results: Premorbid communal living status (e.g. group home) was associated with an odds ratio of 14.67 of exceeding length of stay target. Patients who did not drive prior to their admission had an odds ratio of 2.63 of exceeding their length of stay target. Conclusion: Premorbid communal living and premorbid non-driving status are predictors of patients with acquired brain injuries exceeding target rehabilitation length of stay. These findings may help acquired brain injury rehabilitation programmes plan for the needs of and advocate for patients.
LAY ABSTRACT
In the setting of rising healthcare costs, there is a need to understand which patient factors most affect why patients stay longer than anticipated in hospital. The aim of this study was to determine what non-medical factors affect rehabilitation length of stay in patients after brain injuries. A study of 167 patients with brain injuries was conducted at a rehabilitation hospital to determine if any patient factors were associated with patient hospital length of stay. The results show that patients who lived in communal environments, such as group homes, had 14.67 times the risk of exceeding their length of stay target compared to all other living arrangements. Patients who did not drive prior to their admission had 2.63 times the risk of exceeding their length of stay target compared to drivers. In our study, only patient living environments and driving status were predictors of meeting length of stay targets. These findings may help brain injury rehabilitation programmes plan for the needs of and advocate for their patients.
Downloads
References
Canada PHAo. Injury in review, 2020 edition: spotlight on traumatic brain injuries across the life course. Ottawa: Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada; 2020.
Gray DS, Burnham RS. Preliminary outcome analysis of a long-term rehabilitation program for severe acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 1447–1456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.16343
Association OBI. The OBIA Impact Report 2012: a statistical snapshot of acquired brain injury and its effects on survivors and caregivers. St Catharines, ON: Ontario Brain Injury Association; 2012.
Ontario’s Long-Term Report on the Economy. Chapter 3: Long-term sustainability of Ontario Public Services. fin.gov.on.ca: Ontario Ministry of Finance; 2010
Tooth L, McKenna K, Strong J, Ottenbacher K, Connell J, Cleary M. Rehabilitation outcomes for brain injured patients in Australia: functional status, length of stay and discharge destination. Brain Inj 2001; 15: 613–631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050010013923
Englander JS, Cifu DX, Wright J, Zafonte R, Mann N, Yablon S, et al. The impact of acute complications, fractures, and motor deficits on functional outcome and length of stay after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter analysis. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1996; 11: 15–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-199610000-00003
High Jr WM, Hall KM, Rosenthal M, Mann N, Zafonte R, Cifu DX, et al. Factors affecting hospital length of stay and charges following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1996; 11: 85–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-199610000-00008
Lew HL, Lee E, Date ES, Zeiner H. Influence of medical comorbidities and complications on FIM™ change and length of stay during inpatient rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81: 830–837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-200211000-00005
Cifu DX, Kreutzer JS, Marwitz JH, Rosenthal M, Englander J, High W. Functional outcomes of older adults with traumatic brain injury: a prospective, multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 883–888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90274-9
Frankel JE, Marwitz JH, Cifu DX, Kreutzer JS, Englander J, Rosenthal M. A follow-up study of older adults with traumatic brain injury: taking into account decreasing length of stay. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 57–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.07.309
Kucukboyaci NE, Long C, Smith M, Rath JF, Bushnik T. Cluster analysis of vulnerable groups in acute traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 99: 2365–2369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.11.016
Intiso D, Fontana A, Maruzzi G, Tolfa M, Copetti M, Di Rienzo F. Readmission to the acute care unit and functional outcomes in patients with severe brain injury during rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 53: 268–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04288-X
Avesani R, Carraro E, Armani G, Masiero S. Exploring variables associated with rehabilitation length of stay in brain injuries patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2012; 48: 433–441.
Kennedy RE, Livingston L, Marwitz JH, Gueck S, Kreutzer JS, Sander AM. Complicated mild traumatic brain injury on the inpatient rehabilitation unit: a multicenter analysis. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2006; 21: 260–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200605000-00006
Arango-Lasprilla JC, Ketchum JM, Cifu D, Hammond F, Castillo C, Nicholls E, et al. Predictors of extended rehabilitation length of stay after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91 (10): 1495–1504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.010
Wang H, Camicia M, DiVita M, Mix J, Niewczyk P. Early inpatient rehabilitation admission and stroke patient outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 94: 85–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000226
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001. PMID: 25057539.
Management of Concussion/mTBI Working Group. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for management of concussion/mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009;46(6):1–60.
Freeman EE, Gange SJ, Muñoz B, West SK. Driving status and risk of entry into long-term care in older adults. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 1254–1259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.069146
MacLeod KE, Satariano WA, Ragland DR. The impact of health problems on driving status among older adults. J Transp Health 2014; 1: 86–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2014.03.001
Gholson JJ, Noiseux NO, Otero JE, Gao Y, Shah AS. Patient factors systematically influence hospital length of stay in common orthopaedic procedures. Iowa Orthop J 2017; 37: 233.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alexandre McDougall, Swapna Mylabathula , Mohammad Alavinia , Alice Kam, Mark Bayley, Meiqi Guo, Alan Tam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
