End-of-life decisions and involvement of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Physicians in Europe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v55.5575Keywords:
central nervous system diseases, euthanasia, neurodegenerative diseases, persistent vegetative state, physical and rehabilitation medicine, spinal cord injuries, stroke, suicide, assisted, right to dieAbstract
Objective: As Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians are experts in functional prognoses of disabling health conditions, the aim of this study was to gain insight into their involvement in end-of-life decisions in patients with neurological or terminal diseases in European countries.
Design: Exploratory cross-sectional survey.
Subjects: Delegates of the Union of European Medical Specialists, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Section.
Methods: In July 2020, a self-constructed survey was sent to 82 delegates from 38 European countries, who were asked to answer from the point of view of their country. Topics included the legal status of end-of-life decisions and the involvement of Physical and
Rehabilitation Medicine physicians in these decisions.
Results: Between July 2020 and December 2020, 32 delegates from 28 countries completed the survey (response rate country level of 74%). If legal frameworks allow for these specific end-of-life decisions, involvement of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians was reported in 2 of 3 countries in euthanasia cases, 10 of 17 countries in non-treatment decision cases, and 13 of 16 countries in cases of intensified symptom management by the administration of drugs using potentially life-shortening doses.
Conclusion: Estimated involvement of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians in end-of-life decisions varied between European countries, even when legal frameworks allow for these decisions.
LAY ABSTRACT
End-of-life considerations may arise after severe disabling health conditions and lead to end-of-life decisions. As Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians are experts in functional prognosis for patients with these health conditions, their expertise could be of value to consider in these decisions. Legal frameworks and attitudes towards end-of-life decisions differ between European countries. However, there is a lack of information on the involvement of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians in these decisions. Therefore, delegates of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians in European countries were surveyed on the legal status of end-of-life decisions and the involvement of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians. The responses of delegates from 28 countries suggested differences in involvement of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians in end-of-life decisions between European countries, even between countries with a legal status of these end-of-life decisions. In the light of the ageing population and a general tendency toward more liberal attitudes concerning end-of-life decisions in Europe, these findings could be of interest in order to optimize end-of-life care in the coming years.
Downloads
References
(accessed 17 Sept 2022). Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/rehabilitation
European Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Bodies Alliance. White Book on Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) in Europe. Chapter 1. Definitions and concepts of PRM. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2018; 54: 156–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05144-4
European Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Bodies Alliance. White Book on Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) in Europe. Chapter 3. A primary medical specialty: the fundamentals of PRM. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2018; 54: 177–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05146-8
European Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Bodies Alliance. White Book on Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) in Europe. Chapter 7. The clinical field of competence: PRM in practice. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2018; 54: 230–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05151-1
European Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Bodies Alliance. White Book on Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) in Europe. Chapter 6. Knowledge and skills of PRM physicians. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2018; 54: 214–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05150-X
European Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Bodies Alliance. White Book on Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) in Europe. Chapter 8. The PRM specialty in the healthcare system and society. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2018; 54: 261–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05152-3
Osterthun R, van Asbeck FW, Nijendijk JH, Post MW. In-hospital end-of-life decisions after new traumatic spinal cord injury in the Netherlands. Spinal Cord 2016; 54: 1025–1030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2016.37
Waals EMF, Post MWM, Peers K, Kiekens C. Experiences with euthanasia requests of persons with SCI in Belgium. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 2018; 4: 62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-018-0101-8
Eljas Ahlberg E, Axelsson B. End-of-life care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a comparative registry study. Acta Neurol Scand 2021; 143: 481–488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13370
Maessen M, Veldink JH, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, de Vries JM, Wokke JH, van der Wal G, et al. Trends and determinants of end-of-life practices in ALS in the Netherlands. Neurology 2009; 73: 954–961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b87983
Greer DM, Curiale GG. End-of-life and brain death in acute coma and disorders of consciousness. Semin Neurol 2013; 33: 157–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1348959
Gao L, Zhao CW, Hwang DY. End-of-life care decision-making in stroke. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 702833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.702833
Deyaert J, Chambaere K, Cohen J, Roelands M, Deliens L. Labelling of end-of-life decisions by physicians. J Med Ethics 2014; 40: 505–507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101854
Materstvedt LJ, Clark D, Ellershaw J, Forde R, Gravgaard AM, Muller-Busch HC, et al. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a view from an EAPC Ethics Task Force. Palliat Med 2003; 17: 97–101; discussion 102–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0269216303pm673oa
Radbruch L, Leget C, Bahr P, Muller-Busch C, Ellershaw J, de Conno F, et al. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a white paper from the European Association for Palliative Care. Palliat Med 2016; 30: 104–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216315616524
Emanuel EJ, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Urwin JW, Cohen J. Attitudes and practices of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe. JAMA 2016; 316: 79–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.8499
Bolt EE, Pasman HR, Deeg DJ, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. From advance euthanasia directive to euthanasia: stable preference in older people? J Am Geriatr Soc 2016; 64: 1628–1633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14208
De Vleminck A, Pardon K, Houttekier D, Van den Block L, Vander Stichele R, Deliens L. The prevalence in the general population of advance directives on euthanasia and discussion of end-of-life wishes: a nationwide survey. BMC Palliat Care 2015; 14: 71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-015-0068-1
(accessed 17 Sept 2022) Available from: http://www.dignitas.ch/
Gaignard ME, Hurst S. A qualitative study on existential suffering and assisted suicide in Switzerland. BMC Med Ethics 2019; 20: 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0367-9
Harris J. Consent and end of life decisions. J Med Ethics 2003; 29: 10–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.29.1.10
Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Bulow HH, Hovilehto S, et al. End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. JAMA 2003; 290: 790–797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.6.790
Sprung CL, Ricou B, Hartog CS, Maia P, Mentzelopoulos SD, Weiss M, et al. Changes in end-of-life practices in European intensive care units from 1999 to 2016. JAMA 2019; 322: 1692–1704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.14608
Sprung CL, Ledoux D, Bulow HH, Lippert A, Wennberg E, Baras M, et al. Relieving suffering or intentionally hastening death: where do you draw the line? Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 8–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000295304.99946.58
World Health Organization (WHO). Definition of palliative care. (accessed 17 Sept 2022). Available from: http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/
Cherny NI, Radbruch L, Board of the European Association for Palliative C. European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care. Palliat Med 2009; 23: 581–593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216309107024
Jox RJ, Horn RJ, Huxtable R. European perspectives on ethics and law in end-of-life care. Handb Clin Neurol 2013; 118: 155–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53501-6.00013-5
Ball CG, Navsaria P, Kirkpatrick AW, Vercler C, Dixon E, Zink J, et al. The impact of country and culture on end-of-life care for injured patients: results from an international survey. J Trauma 2010; 69: 1323–1333; discussion 1333–1324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f66878
Sinuff T, Dodek P, You JJ, Barwich D, Tayler C, Downar J, et al. Improving end-of-life communication and decision making: the development of a conceptual framework and quality indicators. J Pain Symptom Manage 2015; 49: 1070–1080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.12.007
Houska A, Loucka M. Patients’ autonomy at the end of life: a critical review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 57: 835–845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.339
Sutherland R. Dying Well-informed: the need for better clinical education surrounding facilitating end-of-life conversations. Yale J Biol Med 2019; 92: 757–764.
European Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Bodies Alliance. White Book on Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) in Europe. Chapter 5. The PRM organizations in Europe: structure and activities. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2018; 54: 198–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05149-3
(accessed 17 Sept 2022). Available from: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49
Sprung CL, Maia P, Bulow HH, Ricou B, Armaganidis A, Baras M, et al. The importance of religious affiliation and culture on end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 1732–1739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0693-0
(accessed 17 Sept 2022). Available from: https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/guidelines-policy/prolonged-disorders-consciousness-following-sudden-onset-brain-injury-national-clinical-guidelines
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rutger Osterthun, Katharina S. Sunnerhagen, Henk J. Stam, Carlotte Kiekens
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
