Perceived work situation and work ability among persons who are working one year after stroke
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v53.918Keywords:
stroke, impairment, vocational rehabilitation, adjustment, work situationAbstract
Objective: To explore how persons who have returned to work perceive their work situation and work ability one year after stroke.
Design: Cross-sectional design.
Subjects: A total of 88 persons of working age (mean age 52 (standard deviation; SD 8) years, 36% women), with mild to moderate disabilities following stroke, who had returned to work within one year after stroke participated in the study.
Methods: A survey including a questionnaire regarding psychological and social factors at work (QPS Nordic) and 4 questions from the Work Ability Index (WAI) was posted to the participants.
Results: According to the QPS Nordic survey, 69–94% of respondents perceived their work duties as well defined, and were content with their work performance. Most participants had good social support at work and at home. Between 51% and 64% of respondents reported that they seldom felt stressed at work, seldom had to work overtime, or that work demands seldom interfered with family life. According to the WAI ≥75% of respondents perceived their work ability as sufficient, and they were rather sure that they would still be working 2 years ahead.
Conclusion: Persons who have returned to work within one year after stroke appear to be content with their work situation and work ability. Appreciation at work, well-defined and meaningful work duties and support seem to be important for a sustainable work situation
Downloads
References
Riksstroke the Swedish stroke register. Årsrapport stroke TIA 2019. Umeå: Riksstroke the Swedish stroke register; 2019 [cited 2020 Dec 1]. Available from: http://www.riksstroke.org/sve/forskning-statistik-och-verksamhetsutveckling/rapporter/arsrapporter/.
Socialstyrelsen (National Report on Health and Welfare S. Statistik om stroke (Statistical database stroke) 2019. [cited Sept 23, 2021] Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik-och-data/statistik/statistikamnen/stroke/.
Jokinen H, Melkas S, Ylikoski R, Pohjasvaara T, Kaste M, Erkinjuntti T, et al. Post-stroke cognitive impairment is common even after successful clinical recovery. Eur J Neurol 2015; 22: 1288-1294.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12743 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12743
Lindström B, Röding J, Sundelin G. Positive attitudes and preserved high level of motor performance are important factors for return to work in younger persons after stroke: a national survey. J Rehabil Med 2009; 41: 714-718.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0423
Hartke RJ, Trierweiler R. Survey of survivors' perspective on return to work after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2015; 22: 326-334.
https://doi.org/10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000044
Palstam A, Törnbom M, Sunnerhagen KS. Experiences of returning to work and maintaining work 7 to 8 years after a stroke: a qualitative interview study in Sweden. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e021182.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021182
Balasooriya-Smeekens C, Bateman A, Mant J, De Simoni A. Barriers and facilitators to staying in work after stroke: insight from an online forum. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e009974.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009974 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009974
Wang YC, Kapellusch J, Garg A. Important factors influencing the return to work after stroke. Work 2014; 47: 553-559.
https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-131627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-131627
Garland A, Jeon SH, Stepner M, Rotermann M, Fransoo R, Wunsch H, et al. Effects of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular health events on work and earnings: a population-based retrospective cohort study. CMAJ 2019; 191: E3-E10.
https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.181238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.181238
Chang WH, Sohn MK, Lee J, Kim DY, Lee SG, Shin YI, et al. Return to work after stroke: The KOSCO Study. J Rehabil Med 2016; 48: 273-279.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2053
Aarnio K, Rodriguez-Pardo J, Siegerink B, Hardt J, Broman J, Tulkki L, et al. Return to work after ischemic stroke in young adults: a registry-based follow-up study. Neurology. 2018; 91: e1909-e1917.
https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006510
Treger I, Shames J, Giaquinto S, Ring H. Return to work in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1397-1403.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701314923 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701314923
Edwards JD, Kapoor A, Linkewich E, Swartz RH. Return to work after young stroke: a systematic review. Int J Stroke 2018; 13: 243-256.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017743059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017743059
Westerlind E, Persson HC, Sunnerhagen KS. Return to work after a stroke in working age persons; a six-year follow up. PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0169759.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169759 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169759
van der Kemp J, Kruithof WJ, Nijboer TCW, van Bennekom CAM, van Heugten C, Visser-Meily JMA. Return to work after mild-to-moderate stroke: work satisfaction and predictive factors. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2019; 29: 638-653.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2017.1313746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2017.1313746
Campbell BCV, Khatri P. Stroke. Lancet 2020; 396: 129-142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31179-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31179-X
Lallukka T, Ervasti J, Lundström E, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Friberg E, Virtanen M, et al. Trends in diagnosis-specific work disability before and after stroke: a longitudinal population-based study in Sweden. J Am Heart Assoc 2018; 7: e006991.
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006991
Alaszewski A, Alaszewski H, Potter J, Penhale B. Working after a stroke: survivors' experiences and perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1858-1869.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280601143356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280601143356
Fadyl JK, McPherson KM, Schluter PJ, Turner-Stokes L. Factors contributing to work-ability for injured workers: literature review and comparison with available measures. Disabil Rehabil 2010; 32: 1173-1183.
https://doi.org/10.3109/09638281003653302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638281003653302
Lindgren I, Brogårdh C, Pessah-Rasmussen H, Jonasson SB, Gard G. Work conditions, support, and changing personal priorities are perceived important for return to work and for stay at work after stroke - a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2020: Oct 26 [Online ahead of print]
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1836522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1836522
Lindström K. Psychosocial criteria for good work organization. Scand J Work Environ Health 1994; 20: 123-133.
Han J, Lee HI, Shin YI, Son JH, Kim SY, Kim DY, et al. Factors influencing return to work after stroke: the Korean Stroke Cohort for Functioning and Rehabilitation (KOSCO) study. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e028673.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028673
Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999; 30: 2131-2140.
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2131
Fugl-Meyer AR, Melin R, Fugl-Meyer KS. Life satisfaction in 18- to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 239-246.
https://doi.org/10.1080/165019702760279242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/165019702760279242
Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol 1989; 46: 1121-1123.
https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022
Cumming TB, Packer M, Kramer SF, English C. The prevalence of fatigue after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke 2016; 11: 968-977.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493016669861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493016669861
Lindström K, Dallner M, Elo A-L, Gamberale F, Knardahl S, Skogstad A, Örhede E (eds.). Copenhagen; 1997. Contract No.: 1997: 15.
Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L and Tulkki A. Work Ability Index. 2nd edn. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 1998.
Ilmarinen J. Work ability - a comprehensive concept for occupational health research and prevention. Scand J Work Environ Health 2009; 35: 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1304
Lundin A, Leijon O, Vaez M, Hallgren M, Torgen M. Predictive validity of the Work Ability Index and its individual items in the general population. Scand J Public Health 2017; 45: 350-356.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817702759 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817702759
Ahlström L, Grimby-Ekman A, Hagberg M, Dellve L. The Work Ability Index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health - a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave. Scand J Work Environ Health 2010; 36: 404-412.
https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.2917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.2917
van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988; 19: 604-607.
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.19.5.604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.19.5.604
Hartke RJ, Trierweiler R, Bode R. Critical factors related to return to work after stroke: a qualitative study. Top Stroke Rehabil 2011; 18: 341-351.
https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1804-341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1804-341
Culler KH, Wang YC, Byers K, Trierweiler R. Barriers and facilitators of return to work for individuals with strokes: perspectives of the stroke survivor, vocational specialist, and employer. Top Stroke Rehabil 2011; 18: 325-340.
https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1804-325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1804-325
Hellman T, Bergström A, Eriksson G, Hansen Falkdal A, Johansson U. Return to work after stroke: Important aspects shared and contrasted by five stakeholder groups. Work 2016; 55: 901-911.
https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162455 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162455
Ntsiea MV, Van Aswegen H, Lord S, Olorunju SS. The effect of a workplace intervention programme on return to work after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2015; 29: 663-673.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215514554241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215514554241
Larsen LP, Biering K, Johnsen SP, Andersen G, Hjollund NH. Self-rated health and return to work after first-time stroke. J Rehabil Med 2016; 48: 339-345.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2061
Palstam A, Westerlind E, Persson HC, Sunnerhagen KS. Work-related predictors for return to work after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2019; 139: 382-388.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13067
Radford K, Grant MI, Sinclair EJ, Kettlewell J, Watkin C. Describing return to work after stroke: a feasibility trial of 12-month outcomes. J Rehabil Med 2020; 52: jrm00048.
Reeuwijk KG, de Wind A, Westerman MJ, Ybema JF, van der Beek AJ, Geuskens GA. "All those things together made me retire": qualitative study on early retirement among Dutch employees. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 516.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-516 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-516
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ingrid Lindgren, Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen, Gunvor Gard, Christina Brogårdh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All digitalized JRM contents is available freely online. The Foundation for Rehabilitation Medicine owns the copyright for all material published until volume 40 (2008), as from volume 41 (2009) authors retain copyright to their work and as from volume 49 (2017) the journal has been published Open Access, under CC-BY-NC licences (unless otherwise specified). The CC-BY-NC licenses allow third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.
From 2024, articles are published under the CC-BY licence. This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
