Touch on predefined areas on the forearm can be associated with specific fingers: Towards a new principle for sensory feedback in hand prostheses

Authors

  • Ulrika Wijk
  • Pamela Svensson
  • Christian Antfolk
  • Ingela K. Carlsson
  • Anders Björkman
  • Birgitta Rosén

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2518

Keywords:

artificial limbs, amputation stumps, sensory feedback, upper extremity.

Abstract

Objective: Currently available hand prostheses lack sensory feedback. A “phantom hand map”, a referred sensation, on the skin of the residual arm is a possible target to provide amputees with non-invasive somatotopically matched sensory feedback. How-ever, not all amputees experience a phantom hand map. The aim of this study was to explore whether touch on predefined areas on the forearm can be associated with specific fingers. Design: A longitudinal cohort study. Subjects: A total of 31 able-bodied individuals. Methods: A “tactile display” was developed consisting of 5 servo motors, which provided the user with mechanotactile stimulus. Predefined pressure points on the volar aspect of the forearm were stimulated during a 2-week structured training period. Results: Agreement between the stimulated areas and the subjects’ ability to discriminate the stimulation was high, with a distinct improvement up to the third training occasion, after which the kappa score stabilized for the rest of the period. Conclusion: It is possible to associate touch on intact skin on the forearm with specific fingers after a structured training period, and the effect persisted after 2 weeks. These results may be of importance for the development of non-invasive sensory feedback systems in hand prostheses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-20

How to Cite

Wijk, U., Svensson, P., Antfolk, C., Carlsson, I. K., Björkman, A., & Rosén, B. (2019). Touch on predefined areas on the forearm can be associated with specific fingers: Towards a new principle for sensory feedback in hand prostheses. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 51(3), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2518

Issue

Section

Original Report