Return to work after interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation: One- and two-year follow-up based on the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain rehabilitation

Authors

  • Marcelo Rivano Fischer
  • Elisabeth B. Persson
  • Britt-Marie Stålnacke
  • Marie-Louise Schults
  • Monika Löfgren

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2544

Keywords:

chronic pain, rehabilitation, registries, return to work, sick leave.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate: (i) changes in sick-leave benefits from 1 year prior to multimodal rehabilitation to 1 and 2 years after rehabilitation; (ii) sex differences in sick leave; and (iii) the impact of policy changes on sick leave. Methods: All patients undergoing multimodal rehabilitation registered in a national pain database for 2007–11 (n = 7,297) were linked to the Swedish Social Insurance Agency database. Sick leave was analysed in 3-month periods: T0: 1 year before rehabilitation; T1: before start; T2: 1 year after; and T3: 2 years after rehabilitation. Four sick-leave benefit categories were constructed: no sick leave, part-time sick leave, full-time sick leave, and full-time permanent sick leave. The individual change in sick-leave category at each time-period was analysed. Results: Sick-leave benefits increased from T0 to T1 (p <0.001) and decreased from T1 to T3 (p < 0.001). Reductions were significant for both men and women from T1 to T3, but men had less sick-leave benefits at T2 and T3. Positive changes in sick-leave benefits at T2 and T3 were found both prior to and after policy changes, with less sick-leave benefits after policy changes at all time-points. Conclusion: Multimodal rehabilitation may positively influence sick-leave benefits for patients with chronic pain, regardless of their sick-leave situation, sex or policy changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-19

How to Cite

Rivano Fischer, M., Persson, E. B., Stålnacke, B.-M., Schults, M.-L., & Löfgren, M. (2019). Return to work after interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation: One- and two-year follow-up based on the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 51(4), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2544

Issue

Section

Original Report