Are the Recommended Excision Margins for Basal Cell Carcinoma Too Defensive? A Retrospective Chart Study and Evaluation of the Dutch Guideline

Authors

  • Eva van Loo Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Patty J. Nelemans
  • Corine Peters
  • Myrurgia Abdul-Hamid
  • Nicole W.J. Kelleners-Smeets

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3705

Keywords:

basal cell carcinoma, excision margins, guidelines

Abstract

Abstract is missing (Short communication)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nahhas AF, Scarbrough CA, Trotter S. A review of the global guidelines on surgical margins for nonmelanoma skin cancers. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2017; 10: 37-46.

Dutch Society of Dermatology and Venereology. Basal cell carcinoma, national guideline version 2.1. Utrecht: Dutch Society of Dermatology and Venereology; 2015. Published online at www.oncoline.nl.

Peris K, Fargnoli MC, Garbe C, Kaufmann R, Bastholt L, Seguin NB, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guidelines. Eur J Cancer 2019; 118: 10-34.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.003

Dutch Society of Dermatology and Venereology. Evidence-based guideline on the treatment of basal cell carcinoma. Utrecht: Dutch Society of Dermatology and Venereology; 2007. Published online at www.oncoline.nl.

Marchetti Cautela J, Mannocci A, Reggiani C, Persechino F, Ferrari F, Rossi E, et al. Identifying the factors that influence surgeon's compliance with excisional margins of non-melanoma skin cancer. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0204330.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204330

Arts DL, Voncken AG, Medlock S, Abu-Hanna A, van Weert HC. Reasons for intentional guideline non-adherence: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 2016; 89: 55-62.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.009

Borgonjen RJ, van Everdingen JJ, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA, van de Kerkhof PC, Spuls PI. A national study on adherence to a basal cell carcinoma guideline; development of a tool to assess guideline adherence. Br J Dermatol 2015; 172: 1008-1013.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.13351

Dutch Melanoma Working Group. Melanoma, national guideline, version 3.0. 2019.

van Delft LCJ, van Loo E, Mosterd K, Kelleners-Smeets NWJ. Comment on "Diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guidelines". Eur J Cancer 2020; 131: 98-99.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.002

Downloads

Published

2021-01-04

How to Cite

van Loo, E., Nelemans, P. J., Peters, C., Abdul-Hamid, M., & Kelleners-Smeets, N. W. (2021). Are the Recommended Excision Margins for Basal Cell Carcinoma Too Defensive? A Retrospective Chart Study and Evaluation of the Dutch Guideline. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 101(1), adv00359. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3705

Issue

Vol. 101 No. 1 (2021): January

Section

Short Communication

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Eva van Loo, Patty J. Nelemans, Corine Peters, Myrurgia Abdul-Hamid, Nicole W.J. Kelleners-Smeets

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

All digitalized ActaDV contents is available freely online. The Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica owns the copyright for all material published until volume 88 (2008) and as from volume 89 (2009) the journal has been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work.

Unless otherwise specified, all Open Access articles are published under CC-BY-NC licences, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution to the original work.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC