Self-reported Nickel Allergy among Schoolchildren: Trends in Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Atopic Comorbidity

Authors

  • Linnea Hedman Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, The OLIN and Sunderby Research Unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
  • Malin Lindberg Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Dermatology and Venereology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
  • Berndt Stenberg Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Dermatology and Venereology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
  • Eva Rönmark Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, The OLIN and Sunderby Research Unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
  • Maja af Klinteberg Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Dermatology and Venereology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v105.42425

Keywords:

nickel, Allergic contact dermatitis, Atopic Dermatitis, Risk factors, allergic comorbidity, allergic rhinitis, Asthma, Prevalence

Abstract

Nickel allergy is common among children. The present study investigated prevalence trends of self-reported nickel allergy, risk factors, and atopic comorbidity among children. Eight-year-old children from Norrbotten County, Sweden, were recruited in 1996 (n = 3,430), 2006 (n =2,585), and 2017 (n = 2,785). Self-reported nickel allergy decreased from 7.7% (2006) to 6.1% (2017; p = 0.024) and was significantly more common among girls. In 1996, only children with atopic dermatitis answered questions on nickel allergy. Among children with atopic dermatitis, no significant decrease was seen over the years 1996 to 2017. Ear piercing (odds ratio [OR] 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39–2.68 and OR 5.57, 95% CI 3.71–8.38) and female sex (OR 4.05, 95% CI 2.68–6.13 and OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.09–2.74) were risk factors for self-reported nickel allergy in 2006 and 2017, respectively. Self-reported nickel allergy was significantly more prevalent among children with atopic dermatitis than without in 2006 (12.3% vs 6.4%; p < 0.001) and 2017 (11.5% vs 5.1%; p < 0.001), and among children with allergic rhinitis in 2017 (8.6% vs 4.7%; p = 0.015). In conclusion, we found a decreasing prevalence of self-reported nickel allergy, but not among children with atopic dermatitis. Ear piercing and female sex were strongly associated with nickel allergy. Our findings also suggest that nickel allergy is associated with atopic dermatitis and allergic rhinitis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alinaghi F, Bennike NH, Egeberg A, Thyssen JP, Johansen JD. Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Contact Dermatitis 2019; 80: 77–85.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13119

Fors R, Persson M, Bergström E, Stenlund H, Stymne B, Stenberg B. Nickel allergy – prevalence in a population of Swedish youths from patch test and questionnaire data. Contact Dermatitis 2008; 58: 80–87.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01257.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01257.x

Lagrelius M, Wahlgren CF, Matura M, Kull I, Lidén C. High prevalence of contact allergy in adolescence: results from the population-based BAMSE birth cohort. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 74: 44–51.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12492

Schuttelaar MLA, Ofenloch RF, Bruze M, Cazzaniga S, Elsner P, Gonçalo M, et al. Prevalence of contact allergy to metals in the European general population with a focus on nickel and piercings: the EDEN Fragrance Study. Contact Dermatitis 2018; 79: 1–9.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12983 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12983

Ahlström MG, Thyssen JP, Wennervaldt M, Menné T, Johansen JD. Nickel allergy and allergic contact dermatitis: a clinical review of immunology, epidemiology, exposure, and treatment. Contact Dermatitis 2019; 81: 227–241.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13327

Ahlström MG, Thyssen JP, Menné T, Johansen JD. Prevalence of nickel allergy in Europe following the EU Nickel Directive – a review. Contact Dermatitis 2017; 77: 193–200.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12846 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12846

Diepgen TL, Ofenloch RF, Bruze M, Bertuccio P, Cazzaniga S, Coenraads PJ, et al. Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions. Br J Dermatol 2016; 174: 319–329.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14167

Rosholm Comstedt L, Dahlin J, Bruze M, Åkesson A, Hindsén M, Pontén A, et al. Prevalence of contact allergy to metals: nickel, palladium, and cobalt in Southern Sweden from 1995–2016. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 82: 218–226.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13422

Halling-Overgaard AS, Kezic S, Jakasa I, Engebretsen KA, Maibach H, Thyssen JP. Skin absorption through atopic dermatitis skin: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 2017; 177: 84–106.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15065

Thyssen JP, McFadden JP, Kimber I. The multiple factors affecting the association between atopic dermatitis and contact sensitization. Allergy 2014; 69: 28–36.

https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12358

Kolberg L, Forster F, Gerlich J, Weinmayr G, Genuneit J, Windstetter D, et al. Nickel allergy is associated with wheezing and asthma in a cohort of young German adults: results from the SOLAR study. ERJ Open Res 2020; 6: 00178-2019.

https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00178-2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00178-2019

Gelardi M, Guarino R, Taliente S, Quaranta N, Carpentieri A, Passalacqua G. Allergic and nonallergic rhinitis and skin sensitization to metals: is there a link? Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol 2017; 49: 106–109.

Dotterud LK, Smith-Sivertsen T. Allergic contact sensitization in the general adult population: a population-based study from Northern Norway. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 56: 10–15.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.00980.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.00980.x

Fall S, Bruze M, Isaksson M, Lidén C, Matura M, Stenberg B, et al. Contact allergy trends in Sweden: a retrospective comparison of patch test data from 1992, 2000, and 2009. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 72: 297–304.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12346

Rönmark E, Lundbäck B, Jönsson E, Platts-Mills T. Asthma, type-1 allergy and related conditions in 7- and 8-year-old children in northern Sweden: prevalence rates and risk factor pattern. Respir Med 1998; 92: 316–324.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-6111(98)90115-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-6111(98)90115-9

Bjerg-Bäcklund A, Perzanowski MS, Platts-Mills T, Sandström T, Lundbäck B, Rönmark E. Asthma during the primary school ages: prevalence, remission and the impact of allergic sensitization. Allergy 2006; 61: 549–555.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01027.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01027.x

Rönmark E, Bunne J, Bjerg A, Perzanowski M, Winberg A, Andersson M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for allergic sensitization: 3 cross-sectional studies among schoolchildren from 1996 to 2017. J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob 2023; 2: 100150.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacig.2023.100150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacig.2023.100150

Af Klinteberg M, Winberg A, Andersson M, Rönmark E, Hedman L. Decreasing prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Swedish schoolchildren: three repeated population-based surveys. Br J Dermatol 2024; 190: 191–198.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljad370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljad370

Hedman L, Andersson M, Bjerg A, Backman H, Af Klinteberg M, Winberg A, et al. Is asthma in children still increasing? 20-year prevalence trends in northern Sweden. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2024; 35: e14120.

https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.14120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.14120

Asher MI, Keil U, Anderson HR, Beasley R, Crane J, Martinez F, et al. International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC): rationale and methods. Eur Respir J 1995; 8: 483–491.

https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.95.08030483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.95.08030483

Flohr C, Weinmayr G, Weiland SK, Addo-Yobo E, Annesi-Maesano I, Björkstén B, et al. How well do questionnaires perform compared with physical examination in detecting flexural eczema? Findings from the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Phase Two. Br J Dermatol 2009; 161: 846–853.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09261.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09261.x

Cristaudo A, Petrucci F, Giannarelli D, Cercato MC, Orsini D, Morrone A, et al. Nickel dermatitis from earrings 15 years after EU directive implementation: a clinical-epidemiological study and a market survey in Rome, Italy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019; 33: 1928–1934.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15650

Ringborg E, Lidén C, Julander A. Nickel on the market: a baseline survey of articles in ‘prolonged contact’ with skin. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 75: 77–81.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12602

Jensen P, Johansen JD, Zachariae C, Menné T, Thyssen JP. Excessive nickel release from mobile phones: a persistent cause of nickel allergy and dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2011; 65: 354–358.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01988.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01988.x

Andernord D, Bruze M, Bryngelsson IL, Bråred Christensson J, Glas B, Hagvall L, et al. Contact allergy to haptens in the Swedish baseline series: results from the Swedish Patch Test Register (2010 to 2017). Contact Dermatitis 2022; 86: 175–188.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13996

Fors R, Persson M, Bergström E, Stenlund H, Stymne B, Stenberg B. Lifestyle and nickel allergy in a Swedish adolescent population: effects of piercing, tattooing and orthodontic appliances. Acta Derm Venereol 2012; 92: 664–668.

https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-1305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-1305

Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O, Geier J, Schnuch A. Risk factors for contact allergy to nickel: results of a multifactorial analysis. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 48: 33–38.

https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.46.s4.29_102.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.46.s4.29_102.x

Lagrelius M, Wahlgren CF, Matura M, Bergström A, Kull I, Lidén C. A population-based study of self-reported skin exposures and symptoms in relation to contact allergy in adolescents. Contact Dermatitis 2017; 77: 242–249.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12816

Hamann CR, Hamann DJ, Hamann QJ, Hamann CP, Boonchai W, Li LF, et al. Assessment of nickel release from earrings randomly purchased in China and Thailand using the dimethylglyoxime test. Contact Dermatitis 2010; 62: 232–240.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01694.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01694.x

Schnuch A, Wolter J, Geier J, Uter W. Nickel allergy is still frequent in young German females – probably because of insufficient protection from nickel-releasing objects. Contact Dermatitis 2011; 64: 142–150.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01841.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01841.x

Thyssen JP, Menné T, Johansen JD. Nickel release from inexpensive jewelry and hair clasps purchased in an EU country: are consumers sufficiently protected from nickel exposure? Sci Total Environ 2009; 407: 5315–5318.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.034

Thyssen JP, Johansen JD, Menné T, Nielsen NH, Linneberg A. Effect of tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption on the prevalence of nickel sensitization and contact sensitization. Acta Derm Venereol 2010; 90: 27–33.

https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-0772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-0772

Overgaard LE, Engebretsen KA, Jensen P, Johansen JD, Thyssen JP. Nickel released from children’s toys is deposited on the skin. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 74: 380–381.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12553

Fors R, Stenberg B, Stenlund H, Persson M. Nickel allergy in relation to piercing and orthodontic appliances: a population study. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 67: 342–350.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02097.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02097.x

Brasch J, Schnuch A, Uter W. Patch-test reaction patterns in patients with a predisposition to atopic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 49: 197–201.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.0227.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.0227.x

Josefson A, Färm G, Meding B. Validity of self-reported nickel allergy. Contact Dermatitis 2010; 62: 289–293.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01702.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01702.x

Hamann CR, Hamann D, Egeberg A, Johansen JD, Silverberg J, Thyssen JP. Association between atopic dermatitis and contact sensitization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017; 77: 70–78.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.02.001

Hegewald J, Uter W, Kranke B, Schnuch A, Gefeller O, Pfahlberg A. Patch test results with metals and meteorological conditions. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2008; 147: 235–240.

https://doi.org/10.1159/000142047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000142047

Mortz CG, Lauritsen JM, Bindslev-Jensen C, Andersen KE. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in adolescents: prevalence measures and associations. The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic Diseases and Dermatitis (TOACS). Acta Derm Venereol 2002; 82: 352–358.

https://doi.org/10.1080/000155502320624087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/000155502320624087

Gül U, Cakmak SK, Olcay I, Kiliç A, Gönül M. Nickel sensitivity in asthma patients. J Asthma 2007; 44: 383–384.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02770900701364213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02770900701364213

Published

2025-04-14

How to Cite

Hedman, L., Lindberg, M., Stenberg, B., Rönmark, E., & af Klinteberg, M. (2025). Self-reported Nickel Allergy among Schoolchildren: Trends in Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Atopic Comorbidity. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 105, adv42425. https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v105.42425