Patient Expectations and Perceived Treatment Benefit in Dermatology: A Sex-specific Analysis in Routine Dermatological Care

Authors

  • Sarah Preis Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Munich, Germany; Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Pettenkofer School of Public Health LMU Munich, Munich, Germany https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1830-3830
  • Lucia Westphal Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Munich, Germany
  • Tilo Biedermann Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Munich, Germany
  • Sophia Horster University Hospital Munich, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Munich, Germany
  • Alexander Zink Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Munich, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v106.adv-2026-0668

Keywords:

treatment expectations, perceived treatment benefit, sex differences, Patient Benefit Index, dermatology, expectation–benefit gap, patient-centered care, routine dermatological care

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Augustin M, Radtke MA, Zschocke I, Blome C, Behechtnejad J, Schäfer I, et al. The patient benefit index: a novel approach in patient-defined outcomes measurement for skin diseases. Arch Dermatol Res 2009; 301: 561–571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-009-0928-8

Topp J, Augustin M, von Usslar K, Gosau R, Reich K, Reusch M, et al. Measuring patient needs and benefits in dermatology using the patient benefit index 2.0: A validation study. Acta Derm Venereol 2019; 99: 211–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3063

Preis S, Ziehfreund S, Biedermann T, Horster S, Zink A. A systematic review of sex and gender differences in treatment outcome of inflammatory skin diseases: Is it time for new guidelines? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2025; 39: 512–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20256

Maul JT, Navarini AA, Sommer R, Anzengruber F, Sorbe C, Mrowietz U, et al. Gender and age significantly determine patient needs and treatment goals in psoriasis - a lesson for practice. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019; 33: 700–708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15324

da Silva N, Augustin M, Langenbruch A, Mrowietz U, Reich K, Thaçi D, et al. Sex-related impairment and patient needs/benefits in anogenital psoriasis: Difficult-to-communicate topics and their impact on patient-centred care. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0235091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235091

Sondermann W, Reinboldt-Jockenhöfer F, Dissemond J, Pfaar O, Bingel U, Schedlowski M. Effects of patients’ expectation in dermatology: evidence from experimental and clinical placebo studies and implications for dermatologic practice and research. Dermatology 2021; 237: 857–871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000513445

Oliver RL. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J Mark Res 1980; 17: 460–469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405

Matrisch L, Rau Y, Karsten H, Graßhoff H, Riemekasten G. The Lübeck medication satisfaction questionnaire-a novel measurement tool for therapy satisfaction. J Pers Med 2023; 13: 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13030505

Armstrong A, Edson-Heredia E, Zhu B, Burge R, Bell S, Crowley JJ, et al. Treatment goals for psoriasis as measured by patient benefit index: results of a national psoriasis foundation survey. Adv Ther 2022; 39: 2657–2667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02124-2

Verardi F, Maul LV, Borsky K, Steinmann S, Rosset N, Pons HO, et al. Sex differences in adverse events from systemic treatments for psoriasis: A decade of insights from the Swiss Psoriasis Registry (SDNTT). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2024; 38: 719–731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.19730

van der Schoot LS, van den Reek JMPA, Groenewoud JMM, Otero ME, Njoo MD, Ossenkoppele PM, et al. Female patients are less satisfied with biological treatment for psoriasis and experience more side-effects than male patients: results from the prospective BioCAPTURE registry. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019; 33: 1913–1920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15733

Zink AGS, Arents B, Fink-Wagner A, Seitz IA, Mensing U, Wettemann N, et al. Out-of-pocket Costs for Individuals with Atopic Eczema: A cross-sectional study in nine European Countries. Acta Derm Venereol 2019; 99: 263–267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3102

Wintermann GB, Abraham S, Peters EMJ, Beissert S, Weidner K. Determinants of perceived patient benefit in a longitudinal cohort study of patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Sci Rep 2025; 15: 1553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84794-2

Flores-Cortés M, Stanton TR, Cuenca-Martínez F. The role of patient expectations in treatment outcome and satisfaction in osteoarthritis: a scoping and mapping review. J Clin Med 2025; 14: 8440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238440

Eicher L, Knop M, Aszodi N, Senner S, French LE, Wollenberg A. A systematic review of factors influencing treatment adherence in chronic inflammatory skin disease - strategies for optimizing treatment outcome. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019; 33: 2253–2263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15913

Additional Files

Published

2026-08-27

How to Cite

Preis, S., Westphal, L., Biedermann, T., Horster, S., & Zink, A. (2026). Patient Expectations and Perceived Treatment Benefit in Dermatology: A Sex-specific Analysis in Routine Dermatological Care. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 106, adv–2026. https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v106.adv-2026-0668

Issue

Section

Short Communication

Categories